jimmysilverrims
Smash Ace
What? Is it now illegal to like two characters? You can show support for more than one character, It is possible.Wiseguy, Wiseguy, Wiseguy. Here you are defending Miis and yet your recent devotion to the Olimar thread has been unheard of! For shame! At least it's nice to know I've got someone to argue with again ^^.
Hmm, that food for though tasted pretty cheap. Sure they're avatars, but casual gamers love 'em. You say 'I think avatars have no place in Brawl' but every single statistic, from Wii Play being one of the highest selling Wii games (Right behind Wii Sports) to another Mii-centric channel in the works, every one loves Mis. Putting them in Brawl is an obvious way to gain casual gamer appeal.Actually, like I originally put, I think that the word "Avatar" is much more suitable for Miis and I still stand by that avatars have no real place in Smash Bros. An avatar can be considered a character, for sure, but I would say that the fact that they can be anyone does take away from my wanting them to be in Brawl. The entire fact that there is no single Mii is completely different from the example of a Pokemon like Pichu because all Pichus are the same in appearance, in the moves that they have and learn, in the fact they evolve into Pikachu, the only quibble is with that many Pokemon need to be justified by personality. However every Mii is different like how every human is different and yet belongs to the same race which is not true of the Pokemon world. Comparing the Mii and Pokemon just isn't valid really, and also the fact that any Pokemon that are like Pichu (no singluar one) are pretty much outdated from the roster now except for special circumstances like the PT. It is rather ironic that in your comparison of Pichu and Mii you seemed to have chosen the one character on the entire Melee roster that no-one wants returning and no-one knows why the hell it was put on in the first place. Food for thought.
Au Contraire, Mr. Game and Watch didn't even have a name and not every game starred exactly him (For all we know Mr. Game and Watch is one of many Game and Watches) and Miis are definitly more interesting than him. Mr.GAW had retro appeal Miis have casual appealGame and Watch may have no character development or distinct personality, but that is merely because his games never called for one. He is still Game and Watch, he is still a distinct character and he is not like a Mii in that he isn't just an avatar. Game and Watch is the same in every game and yet, every Mii is different.
Now that's just mean. Miis are just as much a character as Ness is (They have that many games) They've been in A LOT of suceessful games. Like I said Wii Play outsold Twilight Princess. What does that tell you about appeal?You're using real as in the sense of existing, and yet real can also be ascribed to something to determine how much like the thing something is trying to be really is. Like a footballer that stands on the pitch and never once touches a football, is he really a footballer? He's in a football team, on the pitch during a match but that is the extent that he is a footballer. You could argue that he is one, you could argue that he's not a real footballer, not really. He's technically playing football, but only just (if you argue this point, imagine a goalie that doesn't have to save a shot all match/ball never goes in their half, he's still playing football but he just doesn't have to do anything). Miis I would categorise in the same way that they aren't really videogame characters, not in the way that Link is (another character that is in some way an avatar). I'm also not questioning the fact that they clearly are a videogame character in that they are "characters" in videogames, it would be stupid to say that they do not qualify under the literal definition. However to say that they are videogame characters in the same way as the legends of videogaming and should be included in Brawl is a leap of the imagination.
True, true. Good to keep reality in mind, seeing as the winner gets no real prize (If there even is a winnerOf course, all characters (that have appeared on a Nintendo console) have a chance in that regard. However, I am here debating the worthiness of the Mii, as are you. Our opinions at the end of the day don't matter whatsoever, but it's always fun to argue.
However you did also manage to miss what I was trying to say entirely. I mean, entirely. What I was trying to point out there was that in the main franchise games such as Mario, Zelda, Metroid you never get to play as the badguys and never get to fight against the good guys. Smash Bros. is the place to turn all that on it's head and fight your beloved heroes as the villains. That is the purpose of Smash Brothers, since the selling appeal of the original was exactly that, fight with your favourite Nintendo characters against each other! Or not so favourite, in Pichu's case. >.>The examples you picked are rather silly, since I never said that all characters will be the same with the same art styles, maturity of graphics or only conventional, predictable characters will get in. However I beg to differ that Snake is not a Nintendo all-star since despite being 3rd party and his games now appearing on Sony machines. He is still playable on Nintendo consoles (Gamecube) and his origins were on Nintendo consoles such as the NES in the original games. He does not belong to Nintendo, but he is still (now more of a retro) star of the Nintendo platforms.
Miis have no place in the main franchises to be honest, the party minigames yes but otherwise no. I would be angry if you could play through Super Mario Galaxy as your own Mii, because it'd be completely missing the point of Super Mario Galaxy. If you don't agree with that, then there is no hope for you my friend ^^. [/QUOTE]
True as it may be, past Smash Bros. games hold true to that, but if I was Sakurai, seeing the emmense populairity of the Miis I would definitely would want to cash in on that populairity. It isn't a matter of if they fit in (Because I thought that a lot of caracters don't fit in with each other) This is a game where any Nintendo character can get in, wether they're a transforming character or a copying character, they all (No matter how diffrent) get to star in the same game.
Oh, how untrue. There are many fleshed out movesets for Miis, If you use the handy dandy search function you can easily find tons. II myself even made one that I posted here a while ago.The idea of a tank in Brawl isn't to my liking, but you cannot build a fully fleshed out unique and interesting moveset based on Cow Racing and Tanks. Creating a completely new moveset from scratch wouldn't make sense because surely the idea of including Miis was to pay homage to all the minigames Miis are in, making them famous through Wii Sports and Wii Play, in addition to allowing people to play as their own customisable Brawl character? That'd like be including Link and including none of his moves from the games, surely?
Well, the rest of the world seems to understand.I'll never understand the appeal of wanting to play as a pop culture icon in Brawl.
True, True, but I can see slightly dffrent stats based on weight and height. I can also picture diffrences between male and female, but seriously. Has Jesus ever fought? I picture his movestyle a lot like Chucks.The problem that all of the characters aren't attempting to be something other than what they are. A Mii attempts to be everyone and everything and yet Samus is always going to be Samus and even the Pokemon Trainer only attempts to be the Pokemon Trainer. You can't have a generic Mii moveset, flat out across the board, that would fit all the personas of the Mii. Every PT uses Pokemon to fight, but *sigh* (I hate having to keep using this example) Chuck Norris doesn't fight in the same way that Jesus would. While it wouldn't be a problem for Miis concerning you, the appeal of fighting as a real life person or fictional character is lost when that character has a moveset that in no way correlates to how they'd actually fight.
And playing as a more realistic character is a bad thing?You are a real person. A Mii of you is trying to imitate that real thing, which is you. Putting Miis into Brawl would be allowing any real person to have a cartoony caricature look-a-like in the game. I would go so far as to say that a cartoony version of you is slightly more real than an entirely fictitious character. A Mii in some ways is you and in other, more obvious ways, isn't. If you argue against this point, then you're completely nullifying the appeal that having a Mii in Brawl is like playing as yourself.
You have a point, but it won't only attract the casual gaming commeseuir. It will also bring a new experience. If a Heavier Mii has less knockback and a lighter Mii has more than there you have the solution to an age old problem. You don't need to wear someone elses shoes. If Bowser is too heavy for you, you can make a Mii especially designed for your needs in combat. It's perfect, it brilliant. It's Brawlworthy.However, I doubt the prospect of being able to play as themselves would so much attract the casual gamer since it's the type of game that attracts people, not merely being able to play as themselves. I wouldn't buy a pony focused minigame compilation because it had Solid Snake in it, because whatever way you to try to dress it up in some hardcore appeal it's still an incredibly lackluster casual game.
'Nuff said.