BluePSI
Smash Champion
Hi everyone! what's new in Ness land?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Man, how many people claim to be professional with Ness anyway?Like locally and regionally? lol.
Meh, that's kind of the fun of fighting games though. Using reads and tactics to overcome your opponent. What else should he be relying on, and how would it be better than relying on reads...?He relies far too heavily on reads and mistakes on the other players side to actually make things happen
How do you define kill power though? He has moves that can kill, I mean dair kills at like 30% offstage if we want to split hairs. At what point does a character qualify as having kill power? Not sure what you mean here.Ness doesn't stand out in any way to me, he lacks speed, range, kill power, mix ups, and solid approaches, combos, and kill set ups.
I agree, making reads is what this game is all about, but my point is that Ness lacks the tools to capitalize on these reads or punish well. His speed is below par, his moves dont come in at any blind spots, and his range on his moves, especially tilts is mediocre at best. Yoshi for example has great ground speed, the best air speed in the game, long ranged tilts, a fast jab with cancels, multiple grabs all of which with long range, a great projectile, and DR which allows us to use any move, even smash attacks, out of dash. We can punish a read or mistake far better than Ness ever could.Meh, that's kind of the fun of fighting games though. Using reads and tactics to overcome your opponent. What else should he be relying on, and how would it be better than relying on reads...?
Dair isn't a kill, it's a gimp. If that were true, I could say yoshi has three different kills at 30%. He has fair, dair > footstool, and sourspot nair > footstool. In fact, egg lay can gimp offstage somewhat well as well. I define a kill move by how reliable and how well it can kill. For example, with yoshi (and sorry if I keep using him as an example, he's my most knowledgable character), his best kill moves are uair, usmash, and down b. Even though these are considered his kill moves, yoshi still has fsmash, which has far more knockback and damage output than the previously mentioned, and fair/dair which can kill at ANY damage with a good read offstage. I however don consider them as they are unreliable. They rely on my opponent making a huge mistake or me making an amazing read, while my normal kill moves don't depend on that much error.How do you define kill power though? He has moves that can kill, I mean dair kills at like 30% offstage if we want to split hairs. At what point does a character qualify as having kill power? Not sure what you mean here.
Not so much just combos as much as damage racking. Sure, you guys have PK Fire > grab/smash, but this isn't reliable at high damage and is dependent on your opponent being within range of the attack, which you all know doesn't reach near as far as many other projectiles and has startup and end lag. You also lack a way to create chip damage which can easily build up in camp happy matches, which ness seems to end up in a lot.Do you mean inescapable combos? Those aren't a necessity to do well, I don't think... I dunno about that one. I feel like they were a bigger part of 64/Melee but the change in hitstun has shifted gameplay towards less of that.
Like I said earlier, you lack the moves and range to actually create mixups and punish mistakes. Just like with your 'Ness is like Game & Watch' example, Ness only has a few moves that actually can work in situations where match ups are needed. Problem is though, your moves aren't plain good like GWs are. GW can throw the same moves out all day and the opponent can't contend with the range, speed he has, but Ness is far too slow and has less reach then his better counterpart, so it really doesn't help the fact that his only option isnt great. It's not bad by any means, but when it's all you have, it gets far too predictable and easy to avoid.I don't think mixups are really something characters "have". It's how the person with the controller makes the character unpredictable. So every character can have mixups. Maybe our definitions on all of this stuff is just different.
He has results? I've never seen a Ness make top 8 anywhere in a LONG time. Let alone top 16. Sure, Shaky pulled off 17th in MLG, but that is only one time. FOW placed high, but he didn't win with Ness in any important matches.I'm just playing devil's advocate though. I don't think Ness is great or anything.
The question is though, why should we care if he's good or not as long as he turns up results?
Ness is not even close to viable.
If you think he is you must have a twisted definition of viable.
Viable means the character can win a large tournament. Yes, every character can win, but however, many characters have a good chance, because of troublesome MUs with commonly played characters. Ness loses to practically every top tier character, and only goes even with a few high tiers, not to mention 2 of his hardest MUs are in that tier (marth and D3). Most of the notable accomplishments Ness has in bad MUs are from inexperience. Most of WC has a track record for losing to uncommon tourney characters. Most of top FL doesn't lose to Shaky anymore besides ESAM (already explained).
That's not viable.I can see what you mean in some cases, but "not even close to viable." is a bit much lol. This isn't Melee, in Melee there's an entire section negligible which includes Ness. That's not close to viable because they're just that bad lol. Ness on the other hand has a shot @ top 20 and if that's your goal then he's very viable. I think it's safe to say many people who play Ness aim for that because of their main. Same with Yoshi, Lucas, and other characters not as good. If you're a player and your aiming for something higher then second him like I have been doing. However, this game is fairly new still. Each year the metagame steps up and things are getting gayer. '10 was the year of punishes and follow ups. Everything was being abused in '10 because everything was pretty much known. As you can see Ness is slowly dropping in tourney attendance because punishes are being abused to the max in this game lol.
And to be quite honest, none of our Ness mains play gay enough. Shaky is by fair one of the best examples of how to use PKT, then comes ViceGrip. Those two know how to utilize the move, but they still don't play it nearly as gay as they could imo. Every other Ness is way to aggressive from what I've seen, and stuff like that just won't cut against a better player with a better character.
That was only one time, I don't remember Polt winning any locals since then in Texas or Florida, but winning a local doesn't amount to being viable anyways.Yoshi is viable. Polt actually took 1st in a Florida tournament a while back. Just watch his vids. Even when he loses, it goes down to the wire. Yoshi actually occasionally places when he goes places unlike Ness. Now, I'm not saying yoshi is amazing or that he's top tier, yoshi is (or should be) a solid mid and Ness is borderline low tier. Yoshi HAS the tools to compete in high level as he doesn't have any huge weaknesses and doesn't have any 'get *****' match ups, while ness has a massive weakness to grab releases, gimping, and has multiple terrible match ups.
Viable does not mean a character can place top 20 at a regional.Also, I don't agree w/ him not being viable. Though the Top 20 may be filled with other characters doesn't mean it's @ random lol. Whatever characters are there had to work to get there, not simply by chance. Unless you're talking about a small local then yes lol. But top 20 @ a regional of 80? Is pretty viable or even 60 people is viable.
Most definitions of viable are usually the upper half of the cast, which makes sense.That was only one time, I don't remember Polt winning any locals since then in Texas or Florida, but winning a local doesn't amount to being viable anyways.
Viable does not mean a character can place top 20 at a regional.
@suprememdirt: no
That was only one time, I don't remember Polt winning any locals since then in Texas or Florida, but winning a local doesn't amount to being viable anyways.
Viable does not mean a character can place top 20 at a regional.
@suprememdirt: no
I thought he only took him to game 3 last hit or something. Who knows.
Anyways, this does seem to be a discussion that isn't going anywhere. Majority people think Ness is a "bad" character. Really the only way to make anyone think any different is to start giving results with Ness. All the talk won't accomplish anything.
I think it was only a friendly.EDIT: And I thought M2K DID lose a MM or something against FOW? I honestly can't remember though so don't hold me to that.
I still can't believe that you actually believe that **** lolsupersaiyan.I mained Ness because his head was nearly as big as mine and they were originally gonna put Lucas in the 64 game. I saw Lucas before I saw Ness so I was under the impression that Ness could turn super saiyan. I found out that wasn't the case and stuck w/ Ness because he was just mad sick yo. His split kick Nair was sick and to me he was the most original character in the game. It continued on to Melee where I mained others with Ness. Then Brawl came out and I didn't have a wii but my bro did. So I stuck with Ness only because I was the most familiar with him. I was hoping to pick up Fox and Marth in Brawl because I mained them in Melee along with Ness but because I had no Wii I didn't lol. Once I got a wii I played with other characters and now 2nd Ness only.