Killo89
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 542
- Location
- France
- NNID
- Ilok89
- 3DS FC
- 2681-1840-2189
- Switch FC
- SW-7525-9685-3105
I made an edit of the new artwork with Rosalina's normal colours, and gave it a transparent background.
![]()
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I made an edit of the new artwork with Rosalina's normal colours, and gave it a transparent background.
![]()
Yeah, there's been a lot of dreamy luiginess in Discord.Sorry for being inactive here and not visiting. Job, Discord
She does use telekinesis, it says so in MarioWiki. And also, why not say both? Rosalina can use telekinesis and gravitokinesis, and there's nothing wrong with having more than one type of powers. Most of her Comet Observatory gets it's power from power stars, they are like battery. And Rosalina's uses her wand as a remote to channel the platforms/objects. When Rosalina flies, she does use gravitokinesis, but if you played Mario Tennis Ultra Smash, you'll see Rosalina using telekinesis to levitate her ball. Same with Golf Tour where she lifts the golf club, using telekinesis. Astrology can strongly relate to Rosalina since she spends most her time in outer space, theres a reason to have telekinesis.Same goes with me, lately have only been playing Xenoblade X, so I'm just going to give a delayed Happy Christmas and Happy New Year right there.
Going on the current subject; let's get things in order:
- Rosalina doesn't use telekinesis but gravitokinesis: bottom line is, if you make anything rise with telekinesis you are creating a force upward to oppose gravity that brings the object down, with gravitokinesis you alter gravity itself surrouding the object, if you were to compress the comet observatory with telekinesis, you would need to push everything around it toward the center, instead of just increasing its gravity, and even then, objects don't circle around stuff with telekinesis not spontaneusly at least, as that needs a costant pulling force;
- Actually using muscles doesn't imply that all the force came from the strenght, at highest levels of gravitokinesis, telekinesis, psychokinesis, pyrokinesis ecc. it is possible to make a force able to propel one's limbs or any part of the body, like putting rokets on their back, increasing his force and ths his impact as a result. Mewtwo's UTilt has speed coming uniquely from his psychokinesis, for istance;
- For the point above, I just think that there's no border line for Rosalina using strenght or powers, as she uses the latter as conditionated responses, in fact she even uses them in her idle stance.
I was referring to "powers". Even in her idle stance she uses gravitokinesis, indicating that it is a habit of hers to use it.P.S, latter is an adjective, so I don't know what you're using it to describe.
If we assume she's the Cosmic Spirit, what kind of word can you create for controlling other people? Is this part of cosmokinesis? And I'm sure telekinesis and gravitokinesis are part of cosmokinesis (even though that name makes me wonder what it literally means... "moving the cosmos"?). And is telepathy part of cosmokinesis? Is creating platforms and structures cosmokinesis too (like when she creates the Gateway to the starry sky)? Observing people from afar is part of it too? Where is creating shield and being gigantic too? And her echoing voice? And her wand that disappears and reappears, like in her Smash trailer where she has it just at the end, or in Galaxy 1 when she speaks, she doesn't have it and gets it afterward. And those are real questions.I was referring to "powers". Even in her idle stance she uses gravitokinesis, indicating that it is a habit of hers to use it.
And I'm still not buying that she has telekinesis, mainly becuse 1. It doesn't fit with the space theme like gravitokinesis and 2. One wouldn't want to master gravitokinesis and telekinesis altogether, even if she didn't choose them, it still makes no sense for her to have two powers fill almost the same role.
And she has three type of powers already, wich are gravitokinesis and cosmokinesis and warping.
Don't forget her force field and telepathy.I was referring to "powers". Even in her idle stance she uses gravitokinesis, indicating that it is a habit of hers to use it.
And I'm still not buying that she has telekinesis, mainly becuse 1. It doesn't fit with the space theme like gravitokinesis and 2. One wouldn't want to master gravitokinesis and telekinesis altogether, even if she didn't choose them, it still makes no sense for her to have two powers fill almost the same role.
And she has three type of powers already, wich are gravitokinesis and cosmokinesis and warping.
Actually Mewtwo is just Psychic (or Psychic Fighting in Mega X forme). The one theory for the Darkness attacks in Smash is that it is actually Aura Attacks (he learns Aura Sphere in the home series), but it is just corrupted by the cruelty in his savage heart.It's also similar to some of Mewtwo's powers, and he is indeed a Psychic/Dark type Pokémon.
Well, regardless, I tend to associate "flinging cosmic matter and galaxies and spacial distortions in your face", with being a more darkness oriented power. Which is why I think Rosalina has powers representative of both light and darkness.Actually Mewtwo is just Psychic (or Psychic Fighting in Mega X forme). The one theory for the Darkness attacks in Smash is that it is actually Aura Attacks (he learns Aura Sphere in the home series), but it is just corrupted by the cruelty in his savage heart.
Not trying to be mean, but did you search up the definition of "Telekinesis"? (Again, not being mean.) Also, are you just making up words using *kinesis* at the end of every element? If you are not, then I'd like to see the definitions. For example, if I said I had "Flowerikinesis" that doesn't mean I can magically do magic involving flowers. And I apologize if you found this offensive, but the way you rephrase it is confusing. Are you a scientist?For how I see it, she uses Gravitokinesis whenever she moves stuff around and when I say Cosmokinesis, I'm not referring to manipulating cosmic entities but rather manipulating the blue-to turquoise energy, that I assumed being cosmic energy, and got further confirmation of that when some of it got starred in Smash 4. It just feels natural that the origin of that form of energy are the stars; at the time and still right now, it's also the same color of Mario's Spin, as well as the same of the Maximum-powered core of the Observatory, and the trail of stuff that builds before you ecc. , all in the same theme. Then warping came in as I couldn't associate it with the other two.
Simple as that.
On a side note, I just think that the echoing voice is because of the influence of the above cosmic energy, along with the sudden change of colors she got after accepting her role in the storybook.
I'm not the one who wrote this, y'knowlmao? Since when Echoing voice is a power?
It's just more characterization if anything , lost by the way , but it's 2016 , who cares anymore...?
I wouldn't call it a power myself, in fact.Did I miss any ability? I sure could, and even games where said ability is used.
(yeah and I wrote her echoing voice)
Well, I go on a turbo research whenever I'm typing something I'm unsure of, telekinesis just means "doing anything, as long as you use mind to do so", it's not just creating vectors actually, but that's another story.Not trying to be mean, but did you search up the definition of "Telekinesis"?
Gravitokinesis is the manipulation of the gravity, the force that attracts two bodies with mass. For this reason, whenever it's used to move an object, the object's mass doesn't alter the effort needed.Also, are you just making up words using *kinesis* at the end of every element? If you are not, then I'd like to see the definitions.
It doesn't, just because its actual name is Anthokinesis(Anthos=Greek for Flower).For example, if I said I had "Flowerikinesis" that doesn't mean I can magically do magic involving flowers
Nope, I just have the habit of rephrasing stuff in this not-so-clear way.Are you a scientist?
When did i adress you on this though?I'm not the one who wrote this, y'know
Actually, you wouldn't say "flowerikinesis", but rather "phytokinesis". You take Greek words to begin the word ending with "-kinesis".Not trying to be mean, but did you search up the definition of "Telekinesis"? (Again, not being mean.) Also, are you just making up words using *kinesis* at the end of every element? If you are not, then I'd like to see the definitions. For example, if I said I had "Flowerikinesis" that doesn't mean I can magically do magic involving flowers. And I apologize if you found this offensive, but the way you rephrase it is confusing. Are you a scientist?
Pyrokinesis=FireCosmokinesis is built like pyro-, aero-, hydro-, cryo-, phyto-, chrono-, electro- and geokinesis
You're right. I've also found on the Internet the names "florakinesis" and "agrokinesis".Pyrokinesis=Fire
Aerokinesis=Wind
Hydrokinesis=Water
Cryokinesis=Ice (Elsa)
Phytokinesis=Leaf
Chronokinesis=Time (Doctor Who)
Electrokinesis=Electricity
Geokinesis=Earth
And due to what MezzoMe said, phytokinesis isn't good for replacing flowerikinesis, the correct term is anthokinesis due to an ability to form flowers. And also,
Dry Banana Hippy Hat.
Still interesting to make terms for those though...Rosalina is still an amazing character regardless of what kind of powers she has. I'm just gonna leave it at that.
No it ain't. Not interesting enough.Still interesting to make terms for those though...
You mean canons right? I'm only interested, but never really taken those seriously.If it's made up, I'm not interested.
Canon isn't made up. Canon is what actually happens/what is official. For example, "Rosalina is the mother of the Lumas".You mean canons right? I'm only interested, but never really taken those seriously.
They didn't stick with the design that looks closer to Peach. Her early design had a face with puffier cheeks, like Peach's, and had a near identical dress.Actually it's not ''poorly conceived'' considering there's a couple of interesting stuff backing up what the theory stands for.
I couldn't care less for it , but in the end it was pretty interesting. After all Rosalina was suppoused to be related to Peach in some way , and in the end , ironically , the stick with the desing that looks closer to Peach.
There's no surprise if some could believe that the 2 are related in some way as they were originally suppoused to be , and Rosalina looks and now sounds closer to Peach.
Then again , with how poor stories are in the Mario series , i highly doubt they care enough to make more ties for Rosalina with other characters outside of the Lumas , it just doesn't matter.
Though , Rosalina being related to Peach in some way could explain why she wears a Crown , discarding other explanations since Rosalina wears it when she is a child too. There's a high chance for Rosalina to be part of the same Royalty Peach belongs to.
But again , it's pretty irrelevant , since at this point Rosalina is the character with less consistency in characterization since she appears mostly in spin off games that are low tier .
Oh, well, I was meaning headcanons then. They are interesting, but since it isn't official, I only take it with a little grain of salt.Canon isn't made up. Canon is what actually happens/what is official. For example, "Rosalina is the mother of the Lumas".
That's just because GT likes to use real life science to prove his theory. And once again, it's just a theory, should be only taken with a little grain of salt. And sadly to see many people taken GT's video seriously... what I mean is they always think GT is right.Then the stuff that's just totally made up and contradicts canon is called "fanon". The Game Theory about Rosalina being Peach's daughter is an example of fanon (it tries to be a headcanon but since it's so poorly conceived and contradicts so much canon material, it's deemed as fanon).
Even the real life science is really faulty in that video.Oh, well, I was meaning headcanons then. They are interesting, but since it isn't official, I only take it with a little grain of salt.
That's just because GT likes to use real life science to prove his theory. And once again, it's just a theory, should be only taken with a little grain of salt. And sadly to see many people taken GT's video seriously... what I mean is they always think GT is right.
Well, he recently take the right-left hand thing to another theory that Elsa could be Rapuzel's sister. But besides that he also explain it with other reason which does seems to sound legit. But then again, the video leads to a conclusion that we might know in the next Frozen movie.Even the real life science is really faulty in that video.
He claims Rosalina is left handed, but she's actually quite clearly ambidextrous.
And he doesn't even seem to know the difference between a deciduous and coniferous tree.
?Derp.
....................
I debunked his Rosalina theory with a post a long time ago.Well, he recently take the right-left hand thing to another theory that Elsa could be Rapuzel's sister. But besides that he also explain it with other reason which does seems to sound legit. But then again, the video leads to a conclusion that we might know in the next Frozen movie.
You should know there is one channel called Gnoggin that was famous foe debunkng GT's video, if you do think that Matt's GT videos have false, I mean big false, I will love to see that video. There has been a lot of debunking GT videos but there's no video debunkeding Rosalina's GT video…
?
I'm not really sure about that… and was that post notable around the web? I mean, did you try to post it on reddit?I debunked his Rosalina theory with a post a long time ago.
It doesn't need a video debunking it because it's holes are so obvious that anyone who at least half paid attention to Galaxy should be able to spot them.
Well the humour in GT videos is bad anyway so the show has nothing going for it.I'm not really sure about that… and was that post notable around the web? I mean, did you try to post it on reddit?
And debunking GT videos does not mean dislike GT videos, they still have comedies inside.