Monster Mafia - Game Over

[#HBC | marshy]

unvote cacti vote scumfever

he's a bg

 

[#HBC | Mac]

b g?

 

[Omni]

bad guy

 

[DtJ Jungle]

nuh u h

 

[Omni]

unvote Vote: Jungle

contribute or die

 

[BunBun]

yet you haven't argued the scum vibes you picked up from Macman. i don't like when people who don't contribute to discussion through initiation complain about the lack of conversation. what do you mean by moving these discussions and accusations to general discussion? explain this.

i'm not too particularly fond of your flipflopping on stances.

I haven't 'flipflopped' stances at all. I didn't have a case against Cacti, but I didn't see a big problem with voting him simply to move the game along. Similarly, if the game can develop without the lynch then I don't have a problem removing my vote from him.

The scummy feeling on Macman I had brought up earlier was furthered along when he backpedaled or changed/clarified his intentions in the post right after. Since then, I haven't seen a lot, other than his vote for me after I brought him back up.

Now, since we're actually discussing things, unvote

 

[Cacti]

@Gheb, I mostly posted against Rockin as a response to Omni urging me to contribute. I thought that if I made some kind of case against someone, it would start some discussion. I had looked back, and Rockin was the only person I saw that could've been acting scummy. I know that it isn't much, mostly grasping at straws, but isn't that how most D1s are started? Someone builds a nonsensical case up on RVS or something, which then starts up discussion that leads to scumtells being found.

 

[#HBC | Mac]

unvo te

 

[DtJ Jungle]

@Gheb, I mostly posted against Rockin as a response to Omni urging me to contribute. I thought that if I made some kind of case against someone, it would start some discussion. I had looked back, and Rockin was the only person I saw that could've been acting scummy. I know that it isn't much, mostly grasping at straws, but isn't that how most D1s are started? Someone builds a nonsensical case up on RVS or something, which then starts up discussion that leads to scumtells being found.

Yeah this is true. YOu don't think completely grasping at straws and making a nonsensical case on someone isn't scummy?

 

[Cacti]

It is later on, but in the beginning I'm saying that it's what's used to get D1 rolling, and is not always scummy.

 

[Mediocre]

As of post 170

7/12 votes to lynch

The Current Votecount:

Junglefever: 3 (Rockin, Marshy, Omni)
cacti: 1 (Gheb_01)
Macman: 1 (Junglefever)
Rockin: 1 (Cacti)


Search Terms For Maximum Searchability:
DayOneVoteCount
VoteCount


Activity

Nov 3
Evil Eye
BunBun
Macman
KevinM
Gheb_01
Omni
Marshy
Junglefever
Cacti

Nov 2
mentosman8

Nov 1

Oct 31
Matunas
Rockin

INACTIVE

 

[Omni]

who's down for narrowing the lynch pool for today to the top 5 inactives (not including Iggy/EE)?

 

[mentosman8]

I already stated my reason for voting Cacti. His vote/"case" against Rockin was the biggest piece of nonsene I've read in a while. If that's supposed to be serious then I don't regret my vote on Cacti at all. If he was joking then I see no problem either - he votes Rockin for making jokes but isn't serious himself? He can't complain about that vote.

Yes, you did state it: The next day. At first your vote was just placed with no reasoning at all, then a day later you posted a reason. It looks almost as if you wanted to get your vote on the BW, but didn't have a solid reason to join it, so you placed it anyway and explained it when you came up with something. Why DIDN'T you explain your vote right away instead of waiting until a different post to do so.

 

[~ Gheb ~]

Yes, you did state it: The next day. At first your vote was just placed with no reasoning at all, then a day later you posted a reason. It looks almost as if you wanted to get your vote on the BW, but didn't have a solid reason to join it, so you placed it anyway and explained it when you came up with something.

I was the 2nd vote on that BW. I can't see the future - how was I supposed to know that 2 or 3 other people would jump the BW afterwards? When I voted him that BW you talk about didn't even exist.

Why DIDN'T you explain your vote right away instead of waiting until a different post to do so.

Because nobody asked before that. Didn't feel like explaining it b/c I was only the 2nd vote on that wagon so I didn't think it was a big dead. You still have to answer my question though: What's wrong with Cacti being @ L-2 early in the game?

 

[Omni]

I can't see the future - how was I supposed to know that 2 or 3 other people would jump the BW afterwards?

I'd like to start a Cacti bandwagon since he's only popping in to answer questions and not attempt to start any kind of debate at all.

This .

 

[Matunas]

As of post 170

7/12 votes to lynch

The Current Votecount:

Junglefever: 2 (Marshy, Omni)
cacti: 1 (Gheb_01)
Macman: 1 (Junglefever)
Junglefever: 1 (Rockin)
Rockin: 1 (Cacti)

So Junglefever has 3 votes right? The formatting was strange on that.

@Omni - You want to narrow down it down to exactly who then? I'm not a fan of lynching inactives on D1 unless we have a reason to think they're scum. We get the least amount of information possible out of the lynch this way.

 

[Mediocre]

So Junglefever has 3 votes right? The formatting was strange on that.

Sorry about that. I missed that mistake.

I'll edit it to reflect the vote count better.

 

[Mediocre]

Rockin is now inactive.

He has been prodded.

 

[Omni]

I wouldn't mind just narrowing the lynch pool to players who have been prodded. This game is moving extremely slow.

 

[~ Gheb ~]

Do you expext to get any info out of that, Omni?

 

[Omni]

I expect to get people to become more active so they can avoid being in the lynch pool. There's no reason for townies to coast and make themselves look more suspicious in that manner.

 

[DtJ Jungle]

unvote vote: Cacti

Your post explaining your post about Rockin was....strange. Posting a case on someoen because someone told you to post? I dunno what to make of it but it's strange to just be throwing such an accusuation out there for little or no reason.

 

[Rockin]

Hmm. I kinda believe in what Cacti said about just trying to just start up discussion randomly, especially the reason behind it. Too early to tell if he's scum or not, but still.

Unvote

 

[Matunas]

This game is moving extremely slow.

This.

It seems like people have joined too many mafia games and don't have time for them all.

Vote: EE I know you're replacing but we still haven't heard much of anything from you. There isn't that much to read up on so get cracking.

 

[KevinM]

It's kind of frustrating to not see any posts everytime I come in here, I feel like we should start getting our little choo choo train going on someone.

Vote: Junglefever

Seriously been unhelpful and I'm just getting a general weird vibe from him compared to the normally townie vibe I get. I know its stupid but maybe a little pressure on people is what we need.

Plus if my bro Marsh voted for him then its gotta be a good idea baby.

 

[KevinM]

Also FOS Omni it's really simple to just say you need more activity but if you REALLY want things to flourish in a mafia game you have to put pressure on people without just complaining about the activity itself.

 

[KevinM]

Tuna buddy you too, I'm disappointed :D

 

[#HBC | Mac]

unvote, vote: jungle

i hope i didn't hammer.

 

[KevinM]

I know for a fact you didn't but why would you even place a vote on the assumption that you MAY be hammering before they have a chance to make a defense.

 

[#HBC | Mac]

i'm sorry sir

 

[DtJ Jungle]

@Omni: And saying lynch the inactives without pressuring any of them isn't going to make them anymore inactive, especially when the one saying it isn't voting for any of them.

 

[Omni]

Also FOS Omni it's really simple to just say you need more activity but if you REALLY want things to flourish in a mafia game you have to put pressure on people without just complaining about the activity itself.

reread the thread or just look at all my previous post, Kevin. i've been pressure voting and pushing for debate with players like Cacti and Bunbun and following through with active questioning. i don't understand your FOS against me.

@Omni: And saying lynch the inactives without pressuring any of them isn't going to make them anymore inactive, especially when the one saying it isn't voting for any of them.

nice parrot there, Jungle.

perhaps you're skimming but i started the bandwagon on Cacti with a vote and i now have a vote on you.

 

[Omni]

@Kev: i actually reread the thread to see my post history. 159 and 150 are two of my most recent attempts to stir discussion and apply pressure. i'm a bit more concerned with the fact that you would actually place an FOS on me based on that principle.

you may have been skimming because i asked you a question you have yet to answer or chose to ignore. would be cool if u answered it bro

 

[KevinM]

I was waiting for Cacti to respond to the points made against him so I could make a better guess, I thought it was pretty simple to see why I was waiting.

Also, I'd rather not give you a clean slate just because you had two recent posts with a little more then WE NEED MORE ACTIVES

 

[Omni]

Also, I'd rather not give you a clean slate just because you had two recent posts with a little more then WE NEED MORE ACTIVES

i just want to clarify your FOS on me now that i've shown you that i've been complaining and attempting to scumhunt based on people only making reactive posts.

 

[BunBun]

Yeah, this isn't going to help any of the bandwagons, but I'm still getting this huge scum feeling of Macman.

After my post, all he did was post and 'unvote' with no reasoning at all. Then, he jumped on the Jungle wagon with no reason at all.

If he's not scum, he's certainly going out of his way to appear scummy.

vote Macman

 

[Mediocre]

A Deadline Has Been Set:
11:59 PM EST November 12


As of post 196

7/12 votes to lynch

The Current Votecount:

Junglefever: 4 (Marshy, Omni, KevinM, Macman)
cacti: 2 (Gheb_01, Junglefever)
Rockin: 1 (Cacti)
Evil Eye: 1 (Matunas)
Macman: 1 (BunBun)


Search Terms For Maximum Searchability:
DayOneVoteCount
VoteCount


Activity

Nov 5
BunBun

Nov 4
Omni
Gheb_01
Junglefever
Rockin
Matunas
KevinM
Macman

Nov 3
Evil Eye
Marshy
Cacti

Nov 2
mentosman8

INACTIVE

 

[KevinM]

How is mentos inactive in like all of his games -_-

 

[~ Gheb ~]

Unvote

I expect to get people to become more active so they can avoid being in the lynch pool. There's no reason for townies to coast and make themselves look more suspicious in that manner.

Not what I asked.

I wanted to know what info do you get by lynching an inactive player.

I dunno what to make of it but it's strange to just be throwing such an accusuation out there for little or no reason.

How is that any different from you?

FoS Scumfever

Vote: EE I know you're replacing but we still haven't heard much of anything from you. There isn't that much to read up on so get cracking.

I find it ironic how EE replaces Iggy because of his inactivity just to become inactive himself

How long will EE be replacing Iggy anyways?

Yeah, this isn't going to help any of the bandwagons, but I'm still getting this huge scum feeling of Macman.

After my post, all he did was post and 'unvote' with no reasoning at all. Then, he jumped on the Jungle wagon with no reason at all.

If he's not scum, he's certainly going out of his way to appear scummy.

vote Macman

He always plays like that.

How is mentos inactive in like all of his games -_-

Seriously, he's playing PW Mafia, FFVII, Sleepover, Monster and Simpsons Mafia but is pretty inactive in all of them -____-

Vote Mentosman

 

[Rockin]

I do agree with Kevin about the caution of hammar, Macman. If you feel you might, just either look back on the last tally or don't vote at all >>

Lynching off an inactive player would at least garantee more activity on the game. At the same time, however, people should know (or have a good grasp) on how often Mentos be inactive. It would be nice if he posted a bit more, though.