mentos hasnt said anything either
unrawr
unrawr
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Really Jungle? I've had a few posts already, one of which completely post joke-rawr, and I don't really like the fact that you're saying things that are blatantly not true.mentos hasnt said anything either
unrawr
Try to copypaste it into notepad.My dyslexia is preventing me from reading gheb's posts >>
It's better to point it out so that nobody reads past it, or writes it off as a mod mistake. People should stop being so aggresive. If someone makes a post pointing something out and you already seen it yourself, just be grateful that he points it out for the sake of the rest. People also attack me for pointing out the font thing, why? It's a good way to see how Gheb reacts to it.Gheb said:you guys are very close in outing a townie pr here. i admit its kinda obvious but you shouldnt draw attention to that imo.
I'll have to go re-read the thread later today, I forget. But either way, that's how I see it. You're not supposed to just openly lynch Jesters or the role itself doesn't make sense. Not to mention Mafia Wiki says it's like playing for 2nd.Funny you should mention Crayola, Chibo: did we get "second place" in that game, since SOG was a lynched jester?
is there anything about that course of action that seems wrong to you? which part is wrong and why?You guess at the set-up, and then say someone on the blue yoshi wagon is probably scum based on statistics. Then you pick scumfever because Xonar has a vote on him.
i hope you noticed that this argument is mostly based on wifom. now im not the kind of player whod just 'hello wifom lololo'. every wifom argument describes a scenario with a certain risk/reward ratio. if you look at scumfever and me with that mindset youll see that scumlefever argues for a lynch that takes very little risk (an easy lynch without big conseuences) and has a relatively high reward (a probable mislynch with little risk of being outed). that looks like a perfect play for scum. in my case id like to think that its vastly different. protecting a doomed townie to gain credibility is a common mafia tactic but blue yoshi is by no means 'doomed''. if you look at this scenario youll see that the reward for me would be rather little (saving an inexperienced player) while the risk would be way too high to make it an option if i was scum (the risk being blue yoshi flipping scum and me looking scummy in the process).You seem completely convinced it's a newbie townie mistake, much like scumfever seems completely convinced it's a newbie scum mistake. In all honestly I can see scum taking either stance on this issue if we operate under the assumption blue yoshi is town. They could push the lynch, or they could adamantly oppose it to gain credibility. You and scumfever come off as opposite sides of the spectrum to me.
but is this not reason enough for you already to take a more critical approach to that wagon instead of just pushing the quicklynch?2nd question: I doubt we'll see many large bandwagons that are 100% town.
i asked about whos the scummiest and why, not whos the worst (unless it means the same to you)3rd question: Blue yoshi's vote is the worst vote of the wagon. Especially when he not only didn't remove it, but said he would be voting himself tomorrow as well.
id rather policy lynch the village idiot.Policy.
riddle seems to have gone inactive in most of the game hes in recently. its really annoying. chaco is usually one of the most active posters in almost every mafia game next to macman. its weird to see that he hasnt posted yet but i think hes v/la because i cant remember him having posted a lot in other mafia games these days. cant say for sure though. if this guy starts coasting im all for pressure voting him.Less BlueYoshi wagon, more talking from people who haven't yet. Chaco? Riddle? People whom I've probably forgotten are even in the game? Thoughts, please.
yes, he did. are you skimming?mentos hasnt said anything either
unrawr
My dyslexia is preventing me from reading gheb's posts >>
this.Try to copypaste it into notepad.
what the hell is this? dont hop off the scumfever wagon when were already having 3 votes on him. you want an 'european alliance' with me and then you do dumb stuff like that? if scumfever does things that work against town then you should vote him. get back on that wagon.On a note on the whole Scumfever thing, all I did was make a joke vote. I think the attack on him is based on nothing. He's just trying a bit too hard and ignores some things, which works against town, but looking at his post history I bet that'll improve soon(ish).
unRAWR: ScumFever
No, I won't get back on the wagon, I think we need to keep the good players alive and think it's stupid you guys are so desperate to give up someone so early.what the hell is this? dont hop off the scumfever wagon when were already having 3 votes on him. you want an 'european alliance' with me and then you do dumb stuff like that? if scumfever does things that work against town then you should vote him. get back on that wagon.
Low risk-high reward is good where I come from, do you want to spend the game taking big risks? or going for a low reward? I know I don't. Could you explain what's wrong with Low risk - High reward?Gheb said:a lynch that takes very little risk (an easy lynch without big conseuences) and has a relatively high reward
The thing that's wrong here is that you pick a random person. Except if a RANDOM vote from me is not random to you.Gheb said:is there anything about that course of action that seems wrong to you? which part is wrong and why?
who said anything about 'giving somebody up'? im only talking about a good old wagon. also what if all of the mafia in this game are good players? are we keeping them alive because theyre good?No, I won't get back on the wagon, I think we need to keep the good players alive and think it's stupid you guys are so desperate to give up someone so early.
it is not the same thing. blue yoshi wagon literally had 5 wagoners only because of him self-voting. none of his wagoners have justified their votes and there seemed to be no control over that wagon. of course an inexperienced player cant handle such a situation too well. howd you react?Then you are crying that people are scaring Blue and don't give him time, while you are asking people to RAWR against Scum, doing EXACTLY THAT. Contradiction much?
its very easy for scum to do things that arent risky but rewarding to them. it helps them to stay unnoticed, which is why people need to be called out. look at the blue yoshi wagon again. 5 people are/were on that wagon just because he self voted? where was the discussion about this? its so very easy for scum to place a vote on him without elaborating further and then slip under the radar.Low risk-high reward is good where I come from, do you want to spend the game taking big risks? or going for a low reward? I know I don't. Could you explain what's wrong with Low risk - High reward?
it is not random at all. i have brought forth a legitimate case against scumfever. discussion is being made about it and its deserving of a wagon.The thing that's wrong here is that you pick a random person. Except if a RANDOM vote from me is not random to you.
Yes, if everyone is a good player we should keep them alive as long as possible, and only decide close to the deadline, except if it's obvious.Gheb said:who said anything about 'giving somebody up'? im only talking about a good old wagon. also what if all of the mafia in this game are good players? are we keeping them alive because theyre good?
1. Could you sum up your ScumFever case so it's not spread out all over the thread?it is not the same thing. blue yoshi wagon literally had 5 wagoners only because of him self-voting. none of his wagoners have justified their votes and there seemed to be no control over that wagon. of course an inexperienced player cant handle such a situation too well. howd you react?
scumfever is completely different because i presented a legit case against him and also created a viable platform of discussion in this regard. there was no discussion being made for the blue yoshi wagon. it wasnt legit. scumfever is legit unless somebody proves my case against him wrong.
Things like what?its very easy for scum to do things that arent risky but rewarding to them. it helps them to stay unnoticed, which is why people need to be called out. look at the blue yoshi wagon again. 5 people are/were on that wagon just because he self voted? where was the discussion about this? its so very easy for scum to place a vote on him without elaborating further and then slip under the radar.
I disagree.it is not random at all. i have brought forth a legitimate case against scumfever. discussion is being made about it and its deserving of a wagon.
A whole lotta people were rolefishing before. Why choose Blue Yoshi out of all of em? I think that it seemed like Xonar was fishing pretty bad before. Same goes with the unwillingness to scumhunt. There are others who are doing this too, and are lurking, like Riddle.Funny you should mention Crayola, Chibo: did we get "second place" in that game, since SOG was a lynched jester?
Rawr: Blue Yoshi not really for the self-rawr, but for the role speculation, and the complete unwillingness to scumhunt, even in the future.
Whats so wrong about bandwagons? I think it's a good tactic, and it just pressures people better then just asking them to explain themselves. It's good for pressuring things like lurking, as it will force people to come up and make a defense.Also, I dislike wagons which is why I unRAWRd out of the scumfever wagon. Asking someone to explain themselves is just as resourceful as having 5 RAWRs on him, the only difference is that the mod now has more RAWRs to count. RAWRing should only be done to put pressure, but starting a wagon is anything but pressure as we all know it's not gonna be a lynch any time soon... well not where I come from.
D1 is pressure, pressure, pressure. I think it is good that Gheb is pressuring Scumfever. Gets things rolling. All Gheb's doing is asking people to bandwagon onto Scumfever, which might prompt him to respond.Overall: You are immediately jumping the gun saying that ScumFever is doing something scummy without giving him the time. You're scaring him. (sounds familiar?)
You think it's a good tactic, I think it's a bad tactic. Imo calling people out is just as powerful, and if they keep resisting afterwards it's a possible way to continue.Whats so wrong about bandwagons? I think it's a good tactic, and it just pressures people better then just asking them to explain themselves. It's good for pressuring things like lurking, as it will force people to come up and make a defense.
I guess that's how it rolls here then, sigh. I'll stop interfering and see how Blue and Scum save themselves.D1 is pressure, pressure, pressure. I think it is good that Gheb is pressuring Scumfever. Gets things rolling. All Gheb's doing is asking people to bandwagon onto Scumfever, which might prompt him to respond.
you'll be waiting until Sunday if you do thatI want to wait for Scum's response before I make any decisions.
read post #71 and post #79Could you sum up your ScumFever case so it's not spread out all over the thread?
i agree with this. he put blue yoshi back at l-2 without bringing anything new to the table and cactis response to his accusations have merit. he should explain himself.I'm a bit suspicious of Kirby though because he may have planned this argument we're having over his innocence, hiding behind the facade of a new player. We should keep an eye on him...
youre being unbarably silly now. dragging out the rvs reminds me of scumbags hiding behind a veil of humor. stop it now and get serious. discussion is being made. dont avoid it.you'll be waiting until Sunday if you do that
unrawr: rawr: marshy
been coasting all game take him out guys!
by that logic you can justify everything. it doesnt work. just admit that it was a stupid move and then move on. drawing attention to something that has been talked about so many time is already useless but taking *credit* for doing something stupid is really laughable. who is scummy and why? what do you think of scumfever, chibo and kirbyoshi?But... you have to admit, me voting for myself has given us quite a bit of information based on people's reaction to it...
that sucks hard. i would join your effort of drumming up wagons but youre voting meI wish there were. Gheb's too busy trying to be every other post and everyone else is asleep.
That's exactly why I think we should RAWR carefullyxonar you should be hyped about voting
if you're town it's your best tool!
this looks like a very hasty deduction to me. what makes you so sure that it couldnt be just a town vs town debate between me and scumfever? statistically its the most likely scenario yet its the only one you exclude as an option?From what I've read I -think- that between scumfever and Gheb there are 2 possiblities:
Scum is Scum and Gheb is Town
OR
Scum is Scum and Gheb is Scum
just because the two of us had an argument earlier doesn't mean that we dont share the same allignment. for all i - or you - know we could just be two townies being mistaken or discussing over a nulltell. keep in mind: only scum knows whos town and whos not. assuming that both scumfever and me are both town there seems to be nothing wrong with this scenario.I say this because earlier they seemed to butt heads a lot, which leads me to believe that they are either on opposite sides or that they are both scum staging a fight to gain some credibility to themselves. I highly doubt that they are both protown.
so what am i supposed to do? are you saying that i should *not* play like a townie ... because thats a scummy thing to do? am i supposed to play like a scumbag to make you think im town? thats a huge logical fallacy. if you have a reason to mistrust me then be specific and point out where and why i am suspicious. the underlined part looks particularily counterproductive. why would you *not* let a player with the deduction skills you so praise live? what if you lynch me and i flip town? then you are losing those deductions and you will have an even harder time to find scum. if i really *am* scum and you never manage to lynch me because i manage to look like a townie the whole game then its *you* who need step up your games. but just straight lynching me because of such a fallacious logic could be fatal. in a nutshell you say that i am suspicious becuase i am *not* suspicious.Also, I'm a bit suspicious of Gheb just because even if his posts are critical with good observations. If he was protown, I feel like he would be putting a bulls-eye on his forehead due to the fact that he appears to be a critical player to the mafia. Letting a protown player with skills in deduction live would be a rather dumb plan. If he was mafia, he may be trying to post well(and may actually vote for other mafia) to gain our trust.
and you are unhelpdumbI wish there were. Gheb's too busy trying to be every other post and everyone else is asleep.
this point still stands. posts like this don't change my mind.youre being unbarably silly now. dragging out the rvs reminds me of scumbags hiding behind a veil of humor. stop it now and get serious. discussion is being made. dont avoid it.
do you want to actually win this game?I would totally vig gheb before vigging any of the people he labeled as vig fodder.
Tiger can you show me where Scumfever was butting heads with Gheb and it not just being Gheb shoving his scumfever wagon down everyone's throats?
:D
are you down for a scumfever wagon? i already tried to get it rolling but xonar was being dumb and hopped off. its only me and mentos for now but it would be dandy if you (and hopefully frozen) would hop on it.are there some sweet wagons to choose from?