Gustave - See my 401. His zeal to lynch inactives is a little disturbing, but I've seen town members think the same way. However, I think he is hiding behind the inactives to avoid contributing to the actual substance of the Day, and pressuring inactives is very easy to do, and I don't necessarily believe that he hasn't gained enough information about other players to still want to go with an inactive lynch. I also don't believe his reasoning for being fine with Teran but not rPSI. Unlike John, he tried to give a reason for the difference between Teran and rPSI - but is "personal liking" really enough to overcome his hatred for inactives that is supposedly so strong? Moreover, I honestly cannot find any instance of a stance on Kantrip or Raziek - most of his posts are concerned with the inactives of this game. Nothing to be learned about his alignment from any flip, because he hasn't done anything. His 368 also does not sit well with me at all: "You don't have to elaborate on why you want to lynch us, but what exactly do you plan to do with the 3 other people who hardly post? " It is really strange that he says I don't have to elaborate... it's like he doesn't want to have to defend himself from any points brought up against him - it'd be easier for him to propose an alternate course of action - note that he once again deflects to inactives here.
Gonna try again...
Teran still had my benefit of the doubt over other inactives because I had hope for him, that he would still TRY. Vinyl, I had given up on before the game begun, rPSI, I couldn't imagine him being more active. Teran, I could see, or moreso,
hope that he would still try. Needless to say, I was disappointed
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Frown :( :("
.
In defense of my 368: Reading the post now, I am quite beating myself up for it. It's easy to say now, but the whole idea of the post was to include the word "yet". You didn't have to elaborate
yet, since you said you were waiting with that for John, which I respected. You know I'd rather have something to defend against than being on someone's 'red' scum picks without being given a reason.
I think my mind is made up on who I want to vote in 90-120 mins!
For now, back to studying biology...