This post will regard my belief that @
TheKingofKoopas
is some form of scum. However, I would like to preface this with an invitation: please, defend yourself! If there's something I'm missing, some alternative explaination, bring it to light for scruitiny so we don't lynch a townie.
My suspicion hangs on one, simple, premise: a townie should never have to resort to blatant deception to cast doubt. The non-town relies on clever deception and manipulation, often based around the twisting of words or misrepresentation of arguments. Bowser seems to be rather adept at this art:
Now: I have already detailed the first strike of scummienss below:
The second incident of scummy activity has already been pointed out:
While this could be written off as not reading things, and Bowser did apologize later, I would submit that this is attempted deception followed by back petaling. Why?
1. It does not exist in a vacuum. The first exhibit is a blatant attempt at deception, thus making it all the more likely that this is as well.
2. It was an excellent strategic move on the part of the mafia (wolves?) due to its risk vs reward ratio. Risk? Almost nothing. Everyone would accept his shame corner comment and move on, right? Reward: killing an enemy. We must assume the mafia is intelligent, and this was an intelligent play.
3. Lack of defense. I have accused Bowser of being scum multiple times, tagging him, and asking him to defend himself to his face. He has not. If any of this were to be easily explained away, he would have done it. It's not like he didn't post after my accusations.
What we have in Bowser is an individual that, through twisting of words, attacked someone acting in what is objectively the best interests of the town, someone who has regularly misrepresented, or straight-up ignored, vital aspects of the argument, and someone, who, in light of all this cannot produce even a sentence in their own defense.
