Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
...
I think this means my life is literally in Yolo's hands this game every even day
God have mercy on my soul
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AS9otcbp3tI#t=19
Reading now
Well I didn't think mine would be a problem until Yolo claimed the second half of his role :U
Ryu jester claim, you heard it here first folks!
I sincerely hope this isn't you getting into the game. You made a post to tell us you were reading up and then none of your posts actually had substance. Could you please comment on some relevant stuff? I'd appreciate it, thanks.(I'm honestly just impressed he has THIS MANY Sly Cooper images and gifs to use, restriction or no)
Okay sorry I thought you were done because it had been half an hour since you made a post. I guess not everyone reads as fast as me and I was only perturbed because you made only joke posts. Nothing wrong with them, I just need a balance with content as well. Carry on.I'm still reading Kant. I'm allowed to have fun while I do I'd hope
(it took ALL my self control not to start making Lassie jokes not but 30 seconds ago when Ryu posted the sleeping fox picture)
^This kind of stuff makes me feel like you're trying way too hard to paint someone right away.Take a break, man. You sound awful tense.
Do you not think I'm scum for misrepresenting your opinions? I'm awfully sorry for interpreting all your posts incorrectly but you really gotta be more clear man. When you treat someone like the scum of the earth, usually that implies you think they're the scum of the earth. Or, at the very least, scum.
^Obvi we can't really know if this is a legit realization of intent or not, but either way I find it weird that Kant is still on PJB after having that realization. It explains why could have been interpreted as annoyed with KantAhhh I see! I was misunderstanding the doesn't as some sort of double negative to mean you were saying we were scum together! That makes more sense, thanks.
That said, after the confusion is cleared up you have added a lot of unsavoury responses to the pot that make me want to stay on you.
I agree with at least having him try to vote someone on an even day. We lose nothing if the vote simply doesn't come out, and we know the second part is fake if the vote registers so we aren't taken by surprise.No you're scum hoping to blindside town by publicly lying about your doublevoting status on even Days making it to lylo and alphaing on an even Day making everyone in thread go "damn we shoulda made em try to vote on even Days like gorf mentioned."
I just did. You didn't vote but you jumped on him with words. The first post I quoted.
Again I'm going to say, why are you getting so defensive at me? This is early D1, no need to pull out the insults and retorts. Stay calm, man.
By being offensive....
I don't think that this is the way a town player would respond to this pretty straightforward interaction, this feels like such an act to me.And when I actually ask you for some simple input is when you choose to leave?
i dont wanna be a dentist but errday i be pullin teeth
I think it's fair that there wasn't much to go on but my vote will stay here. I can't know for sure whether you did or didn't think it, but at the very least I respectfully disagree with your interpretation of events if you're legit. He may actually be scum, I don't know, but the way you went for it makes me feel weird.Dietz do you think it's fair if I tell you there isn't much to go on and I agree that some of the stuff I said on Joker initially was very reachy (although I did actually misunderstand what he said as well)? I'm still on him because his reaction to pressure was very defensive over a misunderstanding which he jumped on as calling me a bad player and saying I was trying to misrepresent his intentions. This looks like someone with a guilty conscience over someone actually considering the possibility of
1. pressure
2. a misunderstanding
Joker didn't consider either of these which is what I don't like. Everything prior to his response is reachy, I mean look at when I laid out points for why his original post I disliked was bad. I intentionally bulked that up with points that weren't even on-topic or relevant. I think my intent was pretty clear there.
If I was, you just ruined it so... too late lolDietz I think calling Badwolf my scummate off of buddying me and sheeping me in the Joker interaction is pretty shallow. No one is going to obviously back up their mate like that. I did think he should stop and asked him such, but calling us scum together off of that? Do you really believe that or are you trying to get reactions?
No I'm dead serious when I say I suspect you more than Joker right now.In other words this is your chance to say you just want to see what kind of reactions you get by supporting Joker. Otherwise I don't like your posts at all, think you're chainsaw defending Joker, and think you are scum.
Oh people can disagree with me for sure, and I like trying to see their point of view as well. I just can't see yours unfortunately, and I'm trying to see it but you're not cooperating with me.No I'm dead serious when I say I suspect you more than Joker right now.
People can disagree with you without being scum, and I think that's one thing your scum meta will probably never quite understand if what I think is happening is happening right now.
Correct. You saw your opportunity and took it fmpov.If you were going for reactions, my reaction was probably one that was most valuable to you and I gave it. It's fair if you don't like how I went about pressuring Joker, but I find it hard to believe you can't appreciate that I'm trying to get reads. Do you think I'm pushing a scum agenda to get Joker lynched, or what is my scum intent in this push early D1?
See but this is what you were doing to Joker that I disagreed with. You're going to overly long pains to make it seem like people aren't working with you when they're just answering your questions straight. There's merit in looking for reactions, but there's no reason to play the "woe is me" game while doing it if you weren't looking for extra support, you feel me? *yolo face here* I don't see what the need to be dramatic is if you're just looking for responsesOh people can disagree with me for sure, and I like trying to see their point of view as well. I just can't see yours unfortunately, and I'm trying to see it but you're not cooperating with me.
... Honestly yes at first but the more I argue about it the dumber a scum plan for Kantscum to go for it seems. I'm going to go re-read the interactions...So you think I'm trying to get Joker lynched off of this already?
.
Feeling happy with this wanna-be contribution?Like
raz
Meh
yolo
OH ****ing hell
Joker
Raz is cool, Joker as always can go die, YOLO's name and role piss me off to no extent as well as the way he revealed them.
@Raziek¿?¿?Ryu's restriction is incredibly irritating if it's true. If not and he's trolling us, it'd be nice if he decides to stop soon.
Assuming the restriction is true, are you allowed to use pics with words in them? If so, please post one.
@Badwolf
Any particular reason you like Raziek? Seems just kind of randomly thrown out there in your post.
@ Raziek
Do you feel like Kantrip or Badwolf's posts are "off", or do you consider it general RVS discussion?
@Kantrip push
Rake's case seems interesting. I'm not going to put down my vote due to my restriction (can't change it once I vote), but I'd like to see Kantrip's reply.
Not sure why you're bringing this up.... but you missed most of the post.Feeling happy with this wanna-be contribution?
@YOLO, Raziek, Xatres, CircusAlright, quick catch up post before I'm gone for the day…
@ Raziek
In general, do you support the idea of pressure-voting on a less-than-legitimate wagon for reads in early D1?
@Rake/Laundry
I want your thoughts on Kantrip's case on Joker. How does it reflect on Kantrip, and do you believe Joker's scum?
@Joker
How do you feel about Raziek's defense of Kantrip? You implied you thought it was wrong, but IIRC you didn't post your opinion of Raziek. Do you think Kantrip's scummy for his case on you?
Do you agree that the bold comes off as being defensive?
One more question for you, do you have any reads of note outside of Kantrip/Raziek?
@ Rajam
Can you please just put all your thoughts into one post? Or at the least a smaller number of big posts? At the current rate you're going to fill up a page and a half with nothing but one-liners, and that's going to be irritating when people inevitably have to reread.
First, the analysis done here is safe to do as any alignment specially because the final conclusion is a null read. Second, I find it odd that you like Raziek based on a thought that's not much aligned with yours. Last line is really wishy-washy too.Oh yeah I meant to quote the post but I kinda forgot... One sec@Badwolf
Any particular reason you like Raziek? Seems just kind of randomly thrown out there in your post.
It's not quite in line with my thinking but he makes it sound so.... true. He's clearly thinking and I like that, but I would like him to be thinking more in line with my ideas....Revealing the double-vote immediately is in itself a pro-town action, if it is compulsory. Telling us now is good for the Town. It removes has ability to surprise-hammer at any point. However, I would expect him to do it as scum as well. Null overall, since while the ACTION is pro-Town, it does not reflect on his alignment significantly.
mmmm... no. This is not sufficient imo. Explain yourself better both in your feelings of "opportunistic" and "unnecessary".It's.... opportunistic almost. It has a way of early game startling. I don't like it cause it was really fast and really unnecessary.What about the way yolo revealed his role bothers you?
@Bolded: Why should I care about what you read it as? If you're not saying your read in this then I'm confused as to what is that or why you're telling me how to read people.First, the analysis done here is safe to do as any alignment specially because the final conclusion is a null read. Second, I find it odd that you like Raziek based on a thought that's not much aligned with yours. Last line is really wishy-washy too.
mmmm... no. This is not sufficient imo. Explain yourself better both in your feelings of "opportunistic" and "unnecessary".
Gorf town if Raziek & Kantree are both town. He'd be taking an immediate posture on an issue I think scum would be more speculative and wait for confirmation from PotasiumRaz that's a stretch. Sure it's an OS game and YA NEVER KNOW, but why would somebody with that information crumb/out it so quickly like that? When I read him talking to you and him saying that I saw it as just him saying something that sounded funny. I don't think he ACTUALLY meant that he had information of you being a townie. It's like that stupid thing Rake does whenever he pulls the dongs of Dietz/Ruy and calls em town bros right off the bat in a game. I mean sure I can be wrong but I doubt I am.
You too should be more careful next time when scum k? I mean you slipped within the first 10 posts or so that's not very nice with the mod try to put more effort next time k?What I will recommend is that you use FoS instead of Vote when catching up so you don't accidentally hammer someone one time or something.
Vote: Potassium
Vote: PJB[/quote]no need to toss yur vote around like a...hot potato
This is a little late in being answered of course, but currently I think the Joker angle merits some pressure.Where do you suppose we look then?
*nod*No Rake's case actually sucked and Raz actually felt like it'd do nothing but slow the game down, and honestly, even if Kantrip is scum, where the hell would that DAUNTING case go? Kantrip would probably say no you're wrong and move on with his life like any smart person when presented with a Rake case. Agreed on the latter doe.
I see no point in wasting time with a ****ty case. Derailing it got me plenty of information by seeing who tried to keep that doomed train on the tracks.I mean, ****, in the first place why even out that? In the second place, what reason do you have to believe it? In the third place, are you really that dense or are you just trying that hard to derail Rake's ****?
I'm actually leaning this way right now.Why can't anyone ever solidly read me as town?
Not only is this super defensive, but I'm also feeling quite the opposite. I felt rather "jumped on" in that sequence. Only disclaimer is that it wasn't just him, and I can understand why people were apprehensive at the idea of taking my "back off, he's town" at face value.How am i being opportunistic? I didn't start suspecting Raz, not even a little bit. Show me where I jumped on Raz.
Not sure what you mean, due to the asterisks. If it's why I thought Kantrip had information on me, it's better I not elaborate@ Raziek
can you explain this theory you had regarding *****s roles? that **** flew past my head and i dunno what the **** you were tryna say
Typically no. While it can be useful to draw out reactions, I find it all too easily can give enough flustered responses to be miscontrued and cobbled into a crappy D1 case on how someone is "floundering under pressure", whether they're scum or not. I moved to cockblock that crappy case not only because I THOUGHT Kantrip was crumbing, but also because Kantrip has been known to flounder under pressure as either alignment, and I'd prefer to read him through other means.Alright, quick catch up post before I'm gone for the day…
@ Raziek
In general, do you support the idea of pressure-voting on a less-than-legitimate wagon for reads in early D1?
Agree with this.Gorf town if Raziek & Kantree are both town. He'd be taking an immediate posture on an issue I think scum would be more speculative and wait for confirmation from Potasium
Well that's rude.
Why are you warning me anyways? If I'm being reckless and voting without being current and aware of the votecount, then it's either fishy (scum) or dumb (town). The warning approach you take here means you're reading me more as dumb town, or else you'd ve taken a more offensive route. But then, it means you either know I'm town (and we all know what that implies...), because it'd be incredibly weird that you have a town read on me given that basically I started my posts' streak attacking you and haven't dropped since then.What I will recommend is that you use FoS instead of Vote when catching up so you don't accidentally hammer someone one time or something.
You can always tell it's Washed when the art lingo comes out.Gonna need more than an angry face, babe. Give me a triptych on why you disagree.