Stop it sir bed, when I voted it was obvious you two were the scumteam especially given your insane protectiveness and apoligizing for him, and no it's essentially confirmed because otherwise you would vote him.
As far as the "no resistance", given that x1 said he was gonna leave 7 minutes after I said I was willing to (and thus we wouldn't be able to really debate it), I had to chose between no lynch and lynch dangr, a person I was incredibly suspicious of anyway. NL vs. lynch almost definitely catching scum, easy choice no?
As far as what I would do, I wouldn't lie in a massclaim unless only scum would be able to tell that I'm lying or my role was reactive and could beat the final scum (ex. supersaint, vengeful towny, bomb) thus was pointless to claim (and in that case, only if in lylo). I would never lie about a confirmable role like a doc, or something that gave information like a cop, though your case was arguable.
As far as "stop metaing the mod", NA analysis and figuring out what a balanced game would be and role roles are possible are an incredibly important part of how you win closed games. EE did it to win Bioware, Glork did it to beat me in SE mafia, frankly it's an important part of town play for EVERY CLOSED GAME. It's not about mod meta, it's figuring out what's balanced.
I also like the fact that you were doing it earlier, which is why I brought up the fact that 2-1-9 games are extremely pro-town by their nature, and nerfs to town (like the jailkeeper only really being able to stop town roles) is standard for a balanced setup. Yet, when x1 and I do it, you're saying "stop metaing the mod".
Obviously the argument is ok when it works in your favor, but once the conclusions disagree with you, it's a bad argument.