Hong
The Strongest
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2004
- Messages
- 23,550
What do you mean "no Brand" ?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
What do you mean "no Brand" ?
So you would rather have no new character, than a clone? If see was an alt costume the amount of time spent on her would be no different, but she would have no classic mode trophy, no victory poses, no LUCINA! chant or wouldn't be a part of all star mode.At first I was excited for Lucina but as time goes on its only leaving more of a sour taste. They could have easily made her a tipper and kept her a skin, this whole slight difference thing is getting to me much like Tink.
So does any child if they're the son/daughter of ChromInigo has the brand on his right eye... :'(
I don't really understand. Could you clarify? What's wrong with selecting her through her own individual slot than through Marth's? It really seems like a win-win situation with no downside to me. All it actually means is that it opens up the possibility to give her a slightly different playstyle (having more options is generally a good thing), that selecting her is more convenient and that Lucina fans are happier. I'm just confused about why this bothers people.I'm okay with clones but the fact that she was going to be a alt but got to be her own character just because rubs me the wrong way.
For why it bothers me, I know Lucina has reasons why she should be in smash but I feel like one of the main reasons is because she's a female, so while it's probably not true, it just feels like Lucina is just there to pad out the female roster. One thing I've also seen on other sites is that because Lucina got in for being "slightly different", it opens up the flood gates of similar characters to be clones like Daisy and Dark Pit.I don't really understand. Could you clarify? What's wrong with selecting her through her own individual slot than through Marth's? It really seems like a win-win situation with no downside to me. All it actually means is that it opens up the possibility to give her a slightly different playstyle (having more options is generally a good thing), that selecting her is more convenient and that Lucina fans are happier. I'm just confused about why this bothers people.
There is one big difference between Lucina and Daisy (and lesser so to Dark Pit). Lucina within the realm of her own series is truly dignified and established as a separate and complete character with some fighting style similarities to "The Hero King" Marth. The only difference Daisy has had to Peach within Mario games is that she's a tomboyish princess. There has been no game to truly make Daisy "unique." Lucina is the Princess to a destroyed kingdom that goes back about 20 years to prevent the revival of a dark god that brings apart a cataclysm. Dark Pit, within KI: U, is Pit's "Negative Twin" brought out by a magic mirror who has an anti-hero personality and helps out for matters of respect and not just servitude to the gods. Dark Pit's only things going for him is being seen at the end of Palutena's trailer and that there are 4 weapon types from Kid Icarus Uprising that aren't in Pit's moveset (Palm, Staff, Cannon, and Club though Ore Club is an item). Lucina is her own standing character with similarities to Marth in Awakening, Daisy is "just" a tomboyish Peach that has been limited to spin-offs since Mario Land, and Dark Pit is an edgy magical clone with a pool of in-game material that has yet to be used.For why it bothers me, I know Lucina has reasons why she should be in smash but I feel like one of the main reasons is because she's a female, so while it's probably not true, it just feels like Lucina is just there to pad out the female roster. One thing I've also seen on other sites is that because Lucina got in for being "slightly different", it opens up the flood gates of similar characters to be clones like Daisy and Dark Pit.
Daisy and Dark Pit are just examples and I really don't think they're going to be in. But I've even seen people saying that because of it, if Dr.Mario is In the game, check can't be a alt, he must be a playable character because he has enough differences than Mario.There is one big difference between Lucina and Daisy (and lesser so to Dark Pit). Lucina within the realm of her own series is truly dignified and established as a separate and complete character with some fighting style similarities to "The Hero King" Marth. The only difference Daisy has had to Peach within Mario games is that she's a tomboyish princess. There has been no game to truly make Daisy "unique." Lucina is the Princess to a destroyed kingdom that goes back about 20 years to prevent the revival of a dark god that brings apart a cataclysm. Dark Pit, within KI: U, is Pit's "Negative Twin" brought out by a magic mirror who has an anti-hero personality and helps out for matters of respect and not just servitude to the gods. Dark Pit's only things going for him is being seen at the end of Palutena's trailer and that there are 4 weapon types from Kid Icarus Uprising that aren't in Pit's moveset (Palm, Staff, Cannon, and Club though Ore Club is an item). Lucina is her own standing character with similarities to Marth in Awakening, Daisy is "just" a tomboyish Peach that has been limited to spin-offs since Mario Land, and Dark Pit is an edgy magical clone with a pool of in-game material that has yet to be used.
I was just trying to use those examples to demonstrate the difference in terms of characters that can translate into difference as a fighter. Dr. Mario's differences are entirely aesthetic, last I checked. The fireballs are pills have a different sound effect, the cape's white, and his actual model. The ONLY "problem" with it being an alt would be if Olimar's red Pikmin were immune to fire as they are in their games (which they are not) and if type advantages translated from Pokemon into Smash (which they don't). I really don't see the grounds for arguing that Dr. Mario deserves to be anything more than an alt. costume.Daisy and Dark Pit are just examples and I really don't think they're going to be in. But I've even seen people saying that because of it, if Dr.Mario is In the game, check can't be a alt, he must be a playable character because he has enough differences than Mario.
Dr.Mario in Melee has some differences mostly being a stronger Mario who can't wall jump with a faster air speed but slower ground speed.I was just trying to use those examples to demonstrate the difference in terms of characters that can translate into difference as a fighter. Dr. Mario's differences are entirely aesthetic, last I checked. The fireballs are pills have a different sound effect, the cape's white, and his actual model. The ONLY "problem" with it being an alt would be if Olimar's red Pikmin were immune to fire as they are in their games (which they are not) and if type advantages translated from Pokemon into Smash (which they don't). I really don't see the grounds for arguing that Dr. Mario deserves to be anything more than an alt. costume.
But think of all the filthy casuals who will make stupid jokes about it!If you can't tell them apart, Lucina's Marth disguise is a complete success.
It was probably thanks to all the yoga and pilates DVDs he practiced in his basement, set to the tune of Michael Buble or Maroon 5In Marth's defense, he did bulk up by using his King Marth outfit and looks manlier than Melee/Brawl
I think that's proof enough.Lucina uses the same techniques as Marth, a fighter with whom I'm sure most of you are already familiar. I even went so far as to make their strength, speed, and special attacks almost identical.
source?Directly from Sakurai himself:
I think that's proof enough.
Here's the source: http://www.gonintendo.com/s/233268-...-bros-wii-u-3ds-why-chrom-didn-t-make-the-cutsource?
If you took 5 minutes you could just figure it out yourself. Sakurai's statement in his Famitsu column and the fact Lucina even has the same special move names.If so many people are adamant in saying that she's a clone, then they should show me and others gifs of the moves she used and then gifs of Marth using the same moves. There's not much else to it, really...
And this could very easily make all the differenceShe may have minor animation differences, of course. We don't know all of her regular moves.
Considering that she was originally planned to be an alt for Marth, I think the only hope we have in different moves will be in the custom movesets.If you took 5 minutes you could just figure it out yourself. Sakurai's statement in his Famitsu column and the fact Lucina even has the same special move names.
She may have minor animation differences, of course. We don't know all of her regular moves.
You have no idea what you're talking about... It wouldn't make any difference because even Luigi and Ganondorf are clones despite having different down Bs, different Uptilts, different Final smashes. They are still clones.And this could very easily make all the difference
No, Luigi is a semi-clone. Ganondorf has the same Down B and Uptilt, and even the same properties/stats. Ganondorf is the only actual clone in the series right now, including Lucina, as she already has different properties in her attacks themselves. As such, she is a semi-clone.You have no idea what you're talking about... It wouldn't make any difference because even Luigi and Ganondorf are clones despite having different down Bs, different Uptilts, different Final smashes. They are still clones.
Why do you need it proven to you anyways?(especially when its so obvious) Is it going to affect how you feel about the character?
Come on admit it, she's Marth without the tipper lolNo, Luigi is a semi-clone. Ganondorf has the same Down B and Uptilt, and even the same properties/stats. Ganondorf is the only actual clone in the series right now, including Lucina, as she already has different properties in her attacks themselves. As such, she is a semi-clone.
I don't understand. Why do you want me to admit something which is untrue? That doesn't make sense to me...Come on admit it, she's Marth without the tipper lol
You are so right. When you think about it, assuming your friends allow the custom move-sets, the clone problem really does sort of go away.Considering that she was originally planned to be an alt for Marth, I think the only hope we have in different moves will be in the custom movesets.
Personally, I don't really mind that Lucina is a clone.
I'm not sure if this is the best place to make this clarification haha. It feels like it'd be better placed where non-members of the Smash community frequent.I think your definition of "clone" and the general Smash community's definition of "clone" are two different things.
She does have those "subtle differences," that make her her own character - when we say Lucina is a clone we don't mean she is a 1:1 carbon copy of everything that Marth is and does. What a "clone" is to the general Smash community is a character who shares the same moveset with another character, but has different properties - be they tied to the character's physical stats, or the properties of the moves themselves. She is confirmed to have the same moveset as Marth - posted by Sakurai on Miiverse, in an interview, and from all of the scans/videos we've seen of her so far. So yes, she is a "clone," character - but that doesn't mean she isn't her own character - her attacks will still likely have different properties (knockback, %, speed, lag, etc. etc.) and she notably does not have the tip sweetspot. She's also confirmed to be shorter, which could affect her hitboxes and other subtle - but important - things. She may also have different physical properties such as speed and weight, but he did say they were "almost identical" in that regard, so any difference there would likely be pretty minor.
So yes, Lucina is absolutely a "clone" character in Smash terminology, but don't take that as us saying she is the SAME character as Marth.
Right xDI'm not sure if this is the best place to make this clarification haha. It feels like it'd be better placed where non-members of the Smash community frequent.
This. If you are playing with a Marth and Lucina and you are getting confused who is who; simply don the mask or kindly ask the Lucina to likewise.Also, with Lucina's Mask. You see that, you instantly know it's not Marth, but 'Marth', who is actually Lucina, who was originally a costume for Marth.
Wait, I think I made it even more confusing now.
So how is she different? Besides the tipper and smaller body frame I mean?I don't understand. Why do you want me to admit something which is untrue? That doesn't make sense to me...
That's currently all we know that's different.So how is she different? Besides the tipper and smaller body frame I mean?
Oooooooh, low blow.The one with boobs is Marth.
Like me *continues partying*That's currently all we know that's different.
So far she seems like a more accessible Marth, which also likely took away no development time from other characters, and will be less of a zoner, so people like me who enjoy Marth's style but not the character/zoning can play her.
AHA! So she's Roy!That's currently all we know that's different.
So far she seems like a more accessible Marth, which also likely took away no development time from other characters, and will be less of a zoner, so people like me who enjoy Marth's style but not the character/zoning can play her.