... you serious?I see you trying to say maven misconstrud your posts about the lasers but I never once saw you mention him to be scummy
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
... you serious?I see you trying to say maven misconstrud your posts about the lasers but I never once saw you mention him to be scummy
... that is an excellent point. I guess I should pay more attention to previous posts :/ Was it a typo? So what makes you vote for Maven? I haven't heard any evidence, but I haven't heard any evidence on ANY of the votes yet so that doesn't mean much.And what would you conclude from that "inconsisteny"? I've blatantly argued that Maven's been scummy while not mentioning Rake once.
one isn't necessarily the other in all cases. you saying he made a mistake (what I took it as)isn't always him trying to frame you because of it. my bad... you serious?
should i need a actual reason ?Nope. Is there an actual reason you think I'm scum?
but is he specifically going out of his way to misconstrue it and make it scummy or is it just a gaff on his part ?He's been misconstruing what I've said.
yes, if it was group consensus and I was the only one left to do itactually, lets just make it a everybody question: would you laser yourself ?
Oh, so that was why Rake asked.yes, if it was group consensus and I was the only one left to do it
You're right and I'm actually starting to lean towards the latter. Maven has responded to all my accusations in a pretty level-headed fashion and hasn't made a bigger deal out of it than it neded to be so I have to question whether there was really any scum intent behind his actions. If anybody came out as really suspicious in our exchange it's Orbo imo.but is he specifically going out of his way to misconstrue it and make it scummy or is it just a gaff on his part ?
Also i know you're voting him but shades of grey make this question worth
... that is an excellent point. I guess I should pay more attention to previous posts :/ Was it a typo? So what makes you vote for Maven? I haven't heard any evidence, but I haven't heard any evidence on ANY of the votes yet so that doesn't mean much.And what would you conclude from that "inconsisteny"? I've blatantly argued that Maven's been scummy while not mentioning Rake once.
What does "Unvote
Orbo
Jay / glg
Rake / Maven / Slick
No that's my current reads. I think Orbo is scum and Jay/glg are the next best players to look into. Rake, Maven and Slick are on the safe side for me right now.What does "
Jay / glg
Rake / Maven / Slick" mean? Are you voting for all of us?
You've been saying that, is it from his posts, or just your "Gut feeling"?but guys. GLG is scum
which makes you vote with meYou've been saying that, is it from his posts, or just your "Gut feeling"?
for outside reference that's a high7/10popcorn mafia where i shot kantrip
terribad voteVote: Rake
Oh yeah, that makes sense. But that's still helpful I suppose in that it'll stop the mafia for one night?.
In most settups RB's are more useful in trying to pin a person as scum, but here with 3 possible people being rb'd a night with no individual townie positive if a target was actually rb'd (since he can't be sure anyone else targeted the same person as him), the real benefit is knocking out a scum kill. It's basically like a penalty shot where we get an extra chance to find and lynch scum without them being able to do anything about it.
Yeah that seems like the worst case, but the main benefit is that people will target their scummy reads, while mafia will try to target whoever they think the tracker might be. Tracker also has problems this game since even if they track someone to a night kill target, the person could just claim they were lasering them instead, which depending on their past posts and actions might be believable. I'd say the benefits outweigh the risks.So I guess a worst case scenario is player A and B are mafia, and player C is the Tracker. If we block C D and E, we not only ensure a free kill for the mafia, but then the tracker is blocked. Seems like some people are being awfully cavalier about rbing when it sounds pretty dangerous.
In most settups RB's are more useful in trying to pin a person as scum, but here with 3 possible people being rb'd a night with no individual townie positive if a target was actually rb'd (since he can't be sure anyone else targeted the same person as him), the real benefit is knocking out a scum kill. It's basically like a penalty shot where we get an extra chance to find and lynch scum without them being able to do anything about it.Oh yeah, that makes sense. But that's still helpful I suppose in that it'll stop the mafia for one night?.
Yeah that seems like the worst case, but the main benefit is that people will target their scummy reads, while mafia will try to target whoever they think the tracker might be. Tracker also has problems this game since even if they track someone to a night kill target, the person could just claim they were lasering them instead, which depending on their past posts and actions might be believable. I'd say the benefits outweigh the risks.So I guess a worst case scenario is player A and B are mafia, and player C is the Tracker. If we block C D and E, we not only ensure a free kill for the mafia, but then the tracker is blocked. Seems like some people are being awfully cavalier about rbing when it sounds pretty dangerous.