• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

L-cancelling gone?

Dragonboy2k4

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
723
Location
Location: 1vs1 no items online at this very moment
I understand what you guys are talking about without l-canceling=turtling.But,what if each character has a move already thats fast enough to preform a air dodge before they hit the ground? I can maybe see that happening with something like Mario's u+air.Someone in Japan should try that.The heavy characters already have that non finching stuff to sorta make up for it but its not were near abusable from the looks of it.
 

Teeb147

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
10,624
I understand what you guys are talking about without l-canceling=turtling.But,what if each character has a move already thats fast enough to preform a air dodge before they hit the ground? I can maybe see that happening with something like Mario's u+air.Someone in Japan should try that.The heavy characters already have that non finching stuff to sorta make up for it but its not were near abusable from the looks of it.
you can still be grabbed even if you dont flinch though. But I wonder how easy it is to grab someone in the air this time around..
 

CLeJack

Smash Rookie
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
2
Well this sucks :/. I am sure there will be new things found that will allow for more technique. If not we can always change the focus. Having play styles based on terrain and other things. If we are stuck with the basics, completely flat stages will be annoying to play on; but platforms, hills, or slightly changing environments will allow aerials to stay useful, at least imo. If you are on a flat stage, sure attacking with aerials will be almost useless and defense will be key (at least based on what I have been reading); but if you have a platform to throw an opponent on that opens up attacks from below and behind and this will probably put more emphasis on juggling (which was standard in melee anyway). Also, if your opponent is trying to focus on getting on a flat area that can't be passed through that should open up more attack opportunities for you.

My opinion on this copied and pasted from the gfaqs boards, but to add something I forgot to mention there will be alternatives to approaching with aerials. Long ranged attacks will play a more important role now. A person's shield can only last so long before it becomes useless so wearing it down with long ranged attacks or distanced short ranges attacks will be second alternatives.

hopefully, they will make it so characters without long ranged attacks have some aerial and ground attacks with decent distance, or introduce some more characters with aerial grabs like bowser.
 

xylem

Smash Cadet
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
31
For starters... the pros love this game as much if not more than you do. Please don't act like they are only in it for money. Nobody is. They all love the game, and have taken the game to it's limits. They just happen to make money off of tournaments, so obviously that is an issue to them as well. Try to be somewhat understanding of this.
the mercenary smasher is definitely a rare breed (ken's the only successful one I can think of) But that's not what I wanted to imply. I was trying to say it'd be easier to make a clean break if you didn't like the game AND weren't using the smash community as your ATM. For someone like me who has all but quit their main, just mastered shdl and is getting the feel for JC infinites in order for a chance to topple my states current champion it's insulting as hell to work so hard for a late metagame takeover only to be told "in a few months the metagame is gone and you might as well be playing poker or mario party". I'm personally very inclined to drop smash as I'm not "pro" yet and have barely won enough to cover my entrance fees, so why waste my time learning a game that behind all the glitter is boring, shallow, and makes me feel like I'm 11 years old because it's so friggen noobish (I swear to god we'll never hear the end of this from the shoruyuken guys if it ends up at evo)?

sorry about the TL;DR rant just had to get it off my chest. thanks for giving me a consensus of what's going on though.
 

Teeb147

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
10,624
the mercenary smasher is definitely a rare breed (ken's the only successful one I can think of) But that's not what I wanted to imply. I was trying to say it'd be easier to make a clean break if you didn't like the game AND weren't using the smash community as your ATM. For someone like me who has all but quit their main, just mastered shdl and is getting the feel for JC infinites in order for a chance to topple my states current champion it's insulting as hell to work so hard for a late metagame takeover only to be told "in a few months the metagame is gone and you might as well be playing poker or mario party". I'm personally very inclined to drop smash as I'm not "pro" yet and have barely won enough to cover my entrance fees, so why waste my time learning a game that behind all the glitter is boring, shallow, and makes me feel like I'm 11 years old because it's so friggen noobish (I swear to god we'll never hear the end of this from the shoruyuken guys if it ends up at evo)?

sorry about the TL;DR rant just had to get it off my chest. thanks for giving me a consensus of what's going on though.

I dont know ... sorry but, LOL.. sorry, but that was just a funny story :p
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
only to be told "in a few months the metagame is gone and you might as well be playing poker or mario party". I'm personally very inclined to drop smash as I'm not "pro" yet and have barely won enough to cover my entrance fees, so why waste my time learning a game that behind all the glitter is boring, shallow, and makes me feel like I'm 11 years old because it's so friggen noobish
I'm not entirely sure what your complaint is. I'm not sure if you are mad that Melee won't matter any more or if you are mad about Brawl potentially not being that great competitively?
 

xylem

Smash Cadet
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
31
I dont know ... sorry but, LOL.. sorry, but that was just a funny story :p
is it really that uncommon? or is it just not as extreme in most cases? Anyways this sort of thing happens a lot in general, not just to vidya gaems. It's like being an apprentice on the pony express about to receive a promotion and then "Telegraph? WTF is a Telegraph?!". It's actually quite funny when you distance yourself from the situation a little; they say life up close is a tragedy but from a distance it's a comedy.
 

xylem

Smash Cadet
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
31
I'm not entirely sure what your complaint is. I'm not sure if you are mad that Melee won't matter any more or if you are mad about Brawl potentially not being that great competitively?
just a rambling rant about how brawl is ridiculously uncompetitive. It doesn't offer any solutions, just complaints and thinly veiled murderous hostility. I was looking forward to brawl even without the wavedash, and the messed up physics, but this is the straw that breaks the camels back and I just felt the need to lament. I don't post too often but I felt I had to say something, whether it had substance or was just vitriol and b1tching.
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
It doesn't offer any solutions, just complaints and thinly veiled murderous hostility. I was looking forward to brawl even without the wavedash, and the messed up physics, but this is the straw that breaks the camels back and I just felt the need to lament.
I really hope I'm wrong, but yeah, it's not looking good. Still, we never know how things will turn out.
 

Teeb147

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
10,624
just a rambling rant about how brawl is ridiculously uncompetitive. It doesn't offer any solutions, just complaints and thinly veiled murderous hostility. I was looking forward to brawl even without the wavedash, and the messed up physics, but this is the straw that breaks the camels back and I just felt the need to lament. I don't post too often but I felt I had to say something, whether it had substance or was just vitriol and b1tching.

I think people need to chilax. You shouldnt be expecting stuff like that, you should just go with the flow and enjoy whatever competitiveness IS in.

As for me, I think Brawl will be even More competitive.
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
I think people need to chilax. You shouldnt be expecting stuff like that, you should just go with the flow and enjoy whatever competitiveness IS in.
If you were competitive with Melee you'd understand. The thing is, NOBODY likes a downgrade.
As for me, I think Brawl will be even More competitive.
Why? Is there a factual reason? There aren't many things about Brawl that sound very skill intensive or competitive. All I see are generalized ways of handling balance issues that also detract from the overall depth. Yes, subtracting from depth to add to balance is Sakurai's way of dealing with it. If all the characters are unable to do anything great then they all will balance out, right XD.
 

xylem

Smash Cadet
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
31
well on the bright side, 1p co-op sounds fun and you could be drunk off your a$$ and still have a decent chance of winning at a tourney. As a matter of fact I'm going to still play Brawl but I refuse to attend any Brawl events sober or NOT under the effect of a controlled substance.
 

Dragonboy2k4

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
723
Location
Location: 1vs1 no items online at this very moment
you can still be grabbed even if you dont flinch though. But I wonder how easy it is to grab someone in the air this time around..

Iam sure since some moves gained bigger hitboxes,that still leaves room for moves that have been added to push back now right?Cuz other than that,I can see this game ending up like Street Fighter with jump-in mind games,which is a good thing.For example,if you think Person A turtling,Person B can jump in and not attack at all thus freeing him up to attempt a dodge/air dodge on the shield grab attempt correct?I dunno if you guys think in terms of Street Fighter like that but thats how you stop the defending parry happy players that parry connecting deep flying kicks.

Gimpy also said the airdodges are pretty fast from start up to finish.
 

Teeb147

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
10,624
Meh, sulk about it if you want. Im particularly happy about it being gone and completely disagree with the theory of it having less depth or competitiveness because of it. . if you dont agree with me, then let's agree to disagree.
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
Im particularly happy about it being gone and completely disagree with the theory of it having less depth or competitiveness because of it. . if you dont agree with me, then let's agree to disagree.
Well the thing is, how much experience do you have with the competitive smash scene? How long have you been a part of the community? Just how well do you know the game at it's more advanced level? The thing is, I don't think you are aware of how much impact the lack of l-canceling would have on smash. If you don't know anything about current competitive smash scene and it's history, why are you arguing about how things like l-canceling aren't a big deal?

I just don't understand why people that don't know about the scene thinks that there is no problem with things being taken out. This is really disheartening too, cause a lot of it is coming from guys that want to be a part of Brawl's competitive scene. It's like you are stabbing yourselves in the back and you don't even know it.
did anyone attempt the original method of L-cancelling?
That thought occurred to me as well, but the thing is if I was in their situation I would have tried that immediately after Gimpy's method didn't work. It's a pretty obvious thing to do, so it's a rather safe assumption that they probably did try it.
 

Sliq

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
4,871
PLEASE READ:

If you do not play Melee competitively then this debate is not for you. If you don't plan on attending tournaments, then certain gameplay elements won't apply to you and your enjoyment with the game.

It has been and will always be impossible for a casual player and a competitive player to communicate coherently about strategies and counter strategies due to different playstyles and knowledge.

The fact of the matter is, removing l-canceling is a bad thing. In order to counteract this removal, something has to be added. Why remove a gameplay element and not implement something something different? By removing this option, you are removing depth. It is like Sakurai released Chess 2.0, but in his version you can't castle. It isn't a huge deal to people who play chess occasionally, but to those who play everyday and compete, this is a big deal.

Now, if he were to simply change it or implement something new, that is a different story (i.e. air dodge system). This doesn't mean the new mechanic will be better, but it will be new, and its inclusion will add depth, the amount dependent on how useful this mechanic is.

Now from the looks of it, the new air dodge system seems inferior to the old system because with the old system, it opened a **** ton of options including: wavedashing, wavelanding, substitute third jump (Yoshi, Ness, Jigglypuff, etc), and grapple sweet spotting.

The application of the new system completely removes all of these aspects (grapples auto sweet spot now, so that point may be mute). However, it could also open up new options. I speculate that it will be more shallow than Melee based off of my extensive familiarity with Melee and the information we currently have about Brawl.

Now they removed l-canceling. What they should do is implement something similiar (or not take it out in the first place). If they had made l-canceling automatic, I would be fine with that. If they had kept the old way of FFing then attacking, I'd have been fine with it. But they seemingly just removed it and replaced it with less laggy aerials, but still too laggy.

Now with laggy aerials, if you hit someones shield as you are falling, you will land and get shield grabbed. Basically, anytime anyone jumped, all you'd have to do is position yourself close enough to shield grab, hold R then hit A. It would get boring really fast, because no one would attack without playing a huge spacing game, which takes a lot of time.

Every match would be just like playing a Jigglypuff ditto. Spacing for 8 minutes and occasionally hitting maybe a 3 hit combo. With an improved DI system and less hit stun, combos are going to be scarce.

What it whittles down to is that the best choice will be the defensive choice, and the whole match will be about poking and spacing, with less emphasis on combos.

Also edge guarding. With the snap feature, no longer will there be cheap outs or edge guarding outside of wait on the ledge, let them hit the ground, hit them again. Everyone recovers like Sheik, and it's boring once again. No longer do you need skill or talent to sweet spot, it is done for you, which I find unacceptable. Maybe I don't want to snap to the edge? Maybe I want to go above it? But now I can't; I DON'T HAVE THAT OPTION.

This game will still be great. But it might blow for competitive play, which is what we are concerned about. This game will be everything that casuals want. But by removing a lot of what made Melee great and replacing it with a seemingly inferior mechanic, or no mechanic at all, makes the competitives expect the worst.

No one will know until it comes out, but based off of the information we have now, we can make an educated guess about what Brawl will be about. I hope to God that Brawl is good for competitive play. I don't care about exploits or glitches or any of that bull****. I care about depth. If a glitch or exploit adds depth, then I'm all for it and I'll welcome it. But it seems pointless to remove depth, which is what seems to be currently going on.

All in all, we can only wait and pray.

Note: I will not reply to any comments from anyone that joined within the past 6 months unless they provide some evidence that they play competitively.
 

cooler1339

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Messages
156
Location
Cali, Monterey
Its just a demo, they remove stuff as they please. My guess is that they didn't want pros to come in and own people using it so the new people wouldn't be discouraged from buying the game.
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
My guess is that they didn't want pros to come in and own people using it so the new people wouldn't be discouraged from buying the game.
Please re-read that and realize how silly that statement is XD. There will be a handful of good people and mostly random people. People won't feel very slighted cause their chances of playing them are pretty slim. I also really doubt people will be discouraged from getting the game just cause some guy at the convention was really good and beat them in a few matches XD.
 

AlphaDragoon2002

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 5, 2002
Messages
925
Location
Phoenix, AZ
NNID
AlphaDragoon02
L-cancelling gone with no replacement (such as auto L-cancel like before) would suck, but I think it'd still be way too soon to say that Brawl would suck competitively without it. After all, people discovered a lot of the "advanced techniques" WAY after the release of Melee, so the same could happen for Brawl.

Plus...this is a demo. Just like Ike having invisi-lag at E4All was a glitch that was removed, the lack of L-cancelling could be the same.
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
Plus...this is a demo. Just like Ike having invisi-lag at E4All was a glitch that was removed, the lack of L-cancelling could be the same.
It makes sense to buff Ike. It doesn't make sense to arbitrarily remove wavedashing from a demo. Please use logic.

EDIT: I meant to put arbitrarily remove l-canceling. I'm so used to dealing with people discussing wavedashing that my brain decided to interject that habbit into this post.
 

AlphaDragoon2002

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 5, 2002
Messages
925
Location
Phoenix, AZ
NNID
AlphaDragoon02
It makes sense to buff Ike. It doesn't make sense to arbitrarily remove wavedashing from a demo. Please use logic.
If both are glitches or something that didn't work right when burning a game demo, then it could happen.

Wavedashing is definitely gone and purposefully so, and I don't remember saying anything about it. But L-cancelling could still be in, by virtue that it's a game demo.
 

cooler1339

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Messages
156
Location
Cali, Monterey
I think it makes perfect sense. make the noobs feel like they can win. They will buy the game and then they will lose. After that they can't really return it.
 

GreenKirby

Smash Master
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
3,316
Location
The VOID!
NNID
NoName9999
Why do people here act stupid and try to read into something that's not there?

Just because they didn't mention it doesn't mean it's out.

****!
 

Sliq

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
4,871
I think it makes perfect sense. make the noobs feel like they can win. They will buy the game and then they will lose. After that they can't really return it.
Are you ********? They are going to play THEIR FRIENDS. Not random people at a convention.

Why do people here act stupid and try to read into something that's not there?

Just because they didn't mention it doesn't mean it's out.

****!
NO, the fact that we have FIRST PERSON reports about gameplay mechanics means it is out, you ******* ****. We aren't basing this off of the absence of information, we are basing this on the fact that we have been informed that is it through FIRST HANDS EXPERIENCE WITH THE GAME. Please delete the internet from your computer and stick to solitaire.
 

Dragonboy2k4

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
723
Location
Location: 1vs1 no items online at this very moment
See how it feels guys when you dont except ones opinions?Its like a closed door tell you"We say NO!"I remember getting flamed for no apparent reason for having a different say about tiers in general,and how I felt Mario should be played. While I do have a mad respect for the competive scene,the main reason why those things are being left out in this game is because the scene even tho is much better than most fighting games out there it is still minority compared to the casual scene,which is larger.Just like I for example got flammed by 10 + for thinking Mario can beat anyone.I was in a minority group,therefore,my theory was overruled by mass amount of people.

Nintendo is treating this game in the same manner they made the Wii in.They got crap loads of Wii's sold thanks to the ease of games appealing to those that dont play game often as well as hardcore.But honestly,we shouldnt be crying about L-canceling.Was it important? For missed/block aerials that opened a more pitbulling type game,hell yea it was.But still,theres one thing you guys are forgeting,and thats adapt.When theres changes,theres always room for those "special"changes as well.I hope to see you all on the week of 3/9,if not.. :(
 

slikvik

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
4,179
Location
**** MD/VA. I have no region. no really...
Why do people here act stupid and try to read into something that's not there?

Just because they didn't mention it doesn't mean it's out.

****!
yes, the new l cancel was removed.

i didn't post anything because i didn't think you people would necessarily accept the evidence

a friend of mine (sillyfox) is in the same crew with kei, a japanese smasher. (skypal is a crew name)

he went to the whobby and one of his matches tried to l cancel the entire match using link, and that was all he did, trying to use the method we found at e for all even.

it was removed, there is no l cancel in brawl
i've known for some time, i posted in the back room about it but not here haha
green kirby...try and figure out why we are discussing next time

edit: 40 pages per page is an option
 

Sliq

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
4,871
Yes I am ********. Maybe 1 of their friends is really good. At least now they can beat him. Good enough to buy the game, right?
I hate you so much. Who would not buy Brawl--one of the BIGGEST GAMES FOR THE WII, NAY, ALL NEXT GEN CONSOLES--because they lost a few matches on a god**** demo station!?
 

Sliq

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
4,871
See how it feels guys when you dont except ones opinions?Its like a closed door tell you"We say NO!"I remember getting flamed for no apparent reason for having a different say about tiers in general,and how I felt Mario should be played. While I do have a mad respect for the competive scene,the main reason why those things are being left out in this game is because the scene even tho is much better than most fighting games out there it is still minority compared to the casual scene,which is larger.Just like I for example got flammed by 10 + for thinking Mario can beat anyone.I was in a minority group,therefore,my theory was overruled by mass amount of people.

Nintendo is treating this game in the same manner they made the Wii in.They got crap loads of Wii's sold thanks to the ease of games appealing to those that dont play game often as well as hardcore.But honestly,we shouldnt be crying about L-canceling.Was it important? For missed/block aerials that opened a more pitbulling type game,hell yea it was.But still,theres one thing you guys are forgeting,and thats adapt.When theres changes,theres always room for those "special"changes as well.I hope to see you all on the week of 3/9,if not.. :(
You forgot to mention the part where the removal of these techniques ONLY affect competitive players NEGATIVELY. Casuals don't WD or l-cancel, so why would they remove something implemented by only a minority?
 

Dragonboy2k4

Smash Ace
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Messages
723
Location
Location: 1vs1 no items online at this very moment
You forgot to mention the part where the removal of these techniques ONLY affect competitive players NEGATIVELY. Casuals don't WD or l-cancel, so why would they remove something implemented by only a minority?
I believe you answered you own question but anyhow,its because of the marjority of casual players that DONT use them,therefore the reason Nintendo doesnt see the need to put them in.You guys are in a minority remember,just as the casual players are when they want items and such at tournments. :)
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
I went back and edited my post, I meant to say that l-canceling wouldn't arbitrarily be removed in a demo.
While I do have a mad respect for the competive scene,the main reason why those things are being left out in this game is because the scene even tho is much better than most fighting games out there it is still minority compared to the casual scene,which is larger.
So we should bend to your will and your thoughts because you are the majority?
But honestly,we shouldnt be crying about L-canceling.Was it important? For missed/block aerials that opened a more pitbulling type game,hell yea it was.But still,theres one thing you guys are forgeting,and thats adapt.When theres changes,theres always room for those "special"changes as well.I hope to see you all on the week of 3/9,if not..
You don't really understand how important L-canceling was, so you don't even know what you are talking about when you tell us not to think badly of Brawl for it's removal. It's basically the most important thing to Smash when it comes to competitive play. Before that, the game was silly and not very skill intensive. L-canceling was the key that unlocked the came competitively and made the game look impressive and really intense.
You guys are in a minority remember,just as the casual players are when they want items and such at tournments. :)
That's the thing, if they included them it wouldn't affect the majority. It only affects us. There is no reason to take them out if it only affects competitive play, BECAUSE we are the minority.
 

Sliq

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
4,871
I believe you answered you own question but anyhow,its because of the marjority of casual players that DONT use them,therefore the reason Nintendo doesnt see the need to put them in.You guys are in a minority remember,just as the casual players are when they want items and such at tournment. :)
But thats my point. Why TAKE OUT these things? They don't affect the majority AT ALL, and benefit a small amount of people IMMENSELY.

What you are saying is, they only want so many people to buy and enjoy the game, but after that they don't care, which is the exact opposite of Nintendo's current mindset. Why ****ing target old people and non gamers, considering they are the minority of game players?

They aren't. They are trying to appeal to more people. If that is the case, why remove that appeal to a certain group, when it impacted their core audience so very little. And FYI, there are A LOT of competitive players, so while we are the minority, we still aren't so small to scoff at and disregard.
 

J18

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
333
Location
Wisconsin
i'm pretty sure fast falling is still in, but i'd be the wrong person to ask. see gimpy's report on the demo, the answer's somewhere in there
 

MookieRah

Kinda Sorta OK at Smash
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
5,384
Location
Umeå, Sweden
i'm pretty sure fast falling is still in, but i'd be the wrong person to ask. see gimpy's report on the demo, the answer's somewhere in there
Nobody said fast falling was out, merely that the l-canceling from fast falling is out.
 
Top Bottom