Thankyou ligolski. Mega QTF.
The internet is a potent learning device. =P
Yes, but playing the game always provides more information than researching it. One could do research on the internet and learn about the game, but information like how to understand a fight scene is truly better understood by someone who has actually played the game.
Okay, this whole voting Pure of Heart thing is out of hand. Inactivity is best defined as not playing the game, and is not in a ny way indicative of role. She simply hasn't posted; she's inactive. While it is valid to say that an inactive player is not helpful, she is not necessarily a bad guy. The town goal is to lynch all the non-town players, not the least useful players. A Pure of Heart lynch wouldn't show as much information as a lynch of anyone else. For example, let's say you lynched me. My alliance is then confirmed (I know I'm town, but anyone would say that so it's not really necessary), and then you look at who I sided with, who I sided against, etc. If we lynch PoH, there's no other leads for the next day besides whatever information is obtained overnight.
By contrast to inactivity, lurking is one when is reading the game, and keeping up somewhat, but intentionally not posting. This is much more suspicious than inactivity, as the lurker is afraid to post because he or she may be seen as suspicious for saying something stupid/scummy (ugh, redundant much?). Anyway, I feel that SmashNinja has truly been lurking. You've posted several times, but haven't said much at all in terms of content. Is there anyone you find suspicious, and why?
Vote: SmashNinja
I know it's been a long day, but I really don't think a PoH lynch is the way to go.