Okay, a few things popped up in my re-read. First off, agentli missed his "post restriction" on his "I love day 1's!"
Plus people would purposely try to avoid reapeats to make sure they arent considered to be mafia. They would just want their hands to be washed clean of any kind of suspicion at all.
This could mean he's mafia faking a post restriction, or just missed it and got a freebie. I don't know for sure, but it definitely caught my attention. He also missed it again later on, which makes me even more suspicious.
Vote: Arkengate
For all the suspicion surrounding the actions of today, I feel a no lynch will put us in the same position as Day 1. It won't get us anywhere. While the night killings might help add some more story, we might as well roll the dice and see how people vote. And unfortunately, Arkengate, you're the most suspicious person on my list right now.
After being accused, you don't seem very adamant about defending yourself. You just say that this is what happened in mafia. Well, did it work? Did the no lynch on Day 1 work? I don't think this is the right situation. Perhaps there are some lurkers that we want to lynch.
I want to see what Arkengate has to say. He hasn't really said much of virtue, and the constant switching of arguments seem to be either someone who is really nervous because they're scum, or a novice at the game. Hopefully this vote can get us somewhere, and can lead to more discussion.
I really think something is wrong here. There's actually several more misses (post 161, 286, several times between 300 and 310), but I think you get the idea by now.
I tend to think Ronike is town, as his posts have been very logical, especially the one about the mafia's ability to play the game as a "war of attrition."
I strongly consider Lance to be town for a variety of reasons. He was the first to note the narration hinting at commonyoshi's role, which is in fact very aware. There are other reasons, but I definitely think he's town.
DiamondFalcon did an excellent job of fence-sitting in the commonyoshi-ligolski affair. Granted, I didn't take too strong of a stance against anyone based on that argument either, but saying something like "I won't ignore them, but I don't think I'll vote yet" just rubs me the wrong way.
I'm sorry if that didn't make sense because I'm just musing to myself. I'm deciding what action we should take. If our characters do have something to do with our roles then I think a name claim is something that should be considered. Chill just gave you guys a hint as to who I am. If someone claims they are Chip and Dale, but Chill gives a hint that he was a large person then we'd know he was a liar.
I think the point at the end of the quote is a good one. It also supports NOT-name claiming, as, the later we claim names/roles, the more of these clues we have to use against people.
I'm confused by Deathreaver's interaction with ligolski. He asked if he could go somewhere with ligolski, even though ligolski did not go on the event. This strikes me as strange, and somewhat suspicious. DiamondFalcon pointed this out earlier, and Deathreaver replied, "Uh, no not really Falcon, I just want a group to go somewhere instead of sitting here watching." But if you want to do something, why ask ligolski specifically?
frozenflame has a good point on Uncle Meat, IMO. There's fence-sitting, which is somewhat suspicious, and then there's flip-flopping quickly, which is very suspicious.
agentli was very quick to promote the nameclaim, and started to organize it very haphazardly. Firstly, if a nameclaim is done, the order should be random, not down a list. Secondly, if a nameclaim is done, it should be agreed upon by most or all of the town. Thirdly, this was a terrible time for a nameclaim.
SmashNinja's showing up IMMEDIATELY after receiving some votes is pretty suspicious. I can safely say that that DEFINES lurking. He was clearly reading the thread, but didn't contribute any content (and still hasn't said anything significant).
In conclusion:
Vote: agentli
FoS: SmashNinja
FoS: Deathreaver
