You are playing aff in regards to changing rockstars main with this reasoning
Status quo = Rockstar is maining Ness
If you are changing this you are aff.
I'm running a counterplan saying that this is a better way to argue/convince him to drop ness and attacking your significance of your original argument, saying that one example of a bad matchup isn't enough to justify a character change.
An analysis is incomplete without all of the sample data. Individual pieces (separated examples) aren't representative of the whole because there will always be outliers in sets of data. The only way to deal with these deviations and still represent the normal ones is to look at things in their entirety. A metagame analysis can't be broken down because of that.
I respectfully disagree with how you're framing the debate, but I can admit you're reasoning is sound based on how you've framed it.
In my mind it was:
Rockstar's resolved that maining Ness is the best way for him to win, placing him the application.
I negated saying that if the value is winning, the better criteria for getting their would be maining a different character.
In which point your refutation was that arguing from examples was bad logic.
Then we argued about example and their validity in argument.
In this instance, I wasn't playing affirmative of anything, but simply negating the entire time in my mind. I was negating Rockstar's vc of Ness and your resolution that examples are bad arguing.
I wasn't convinced until I saw this post. That is sad that you have nothing better to do with your life LOL.
MJG, while I respect your opinion in the matters of Brawl and you generally as a person, I think that this was uncalled for. Your opinion is based on the very narrow scope that you know me.
I wish you would reserve judgment and insults until you've worked two job to help pay to put yourself and a sibling through college, work an unpaid internship where you feed the homeless community of a city, and attend night classes in the time you do have, all at the same time. All while maintaining a healthy relationship/social life. Once you've done all of that, aka walking a mile in my shoes, then I'll accept your judgment.
Seriously, it's terrible that having intelligent discussion is reason to be ridiculed. Especially among such a "nerdy" community like the Brawl community.
Now that the Ad Hominem arguments are coming out, I'm done with it and moving on. It was fun Quote.