• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Jaxel, 8WayRun, comments on APEX

MattDotZeb

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
6,122
Location
Quincy, MA
I saw some people discussing this in the APEX video thread and I figure it may be better to have it in it's own topic.
I think Jaxel makes some good points, and some TOs should consider listening to what he and other members within the FGC have to say about how Smash tournaments are run.
What do you all think?

You can watch the video here:
Starting at 17:30

Or you can read what he and the other person commentating were saying.
I didn't know the name of the other person, so I have dubbed him "Team Rocket Shirt" or TRS
Jaxel:
Alright. Let me put this point out there. I'll answer any questions you have about APEX. I'm probably going to end up throwing someone under the bus. Whoever you are that I'm probably going to end up throwing under the bus. I'm sorry, that doesn't mean I'm not your friend anymore. If someone ****s up, I'm going to call them out on it. Even if I'm their best friend. Don't take this personally, but you ****ed up. Okay, ask away.

Team Rocket Shirt:
Why the hell weren't there enough people to actually run this second room with marvel, street fighter, and mortal kombat? Where was everybody? Why did we have go hunt down to find people to run our tournament, and they didn't run it anyway? We had to get Local Battles to run our tournament.

Jaxel:
There were actually two different groups of people running APEX. There was the APEX crew and Juice Gaming. The APEX crew ran only Smash. Pretty much they ran the Smash stuff. Smash ran great. It was a 3-day event with 1000 people and it only ran 3 hours behind. That is amazing. That doesn't happen. APEX was ran perfectly, the Smash community never really had an event like this so they think it was run poorly. They don't know. It was run great. They just don't know. But because of how much work they were putting in to running Smash, they hired a different group of people to run the 2Ds. They hired Juice Gaming. And I don't know what went wrong, but Brandon, one of the cofounders of Juice, fell apart. He was not getting **** done. Two weeks beforehand we told Brandon the schedule doesn't make sense. That it was not going to work. The entire time he was like "No, this is fine. This is how we gotta do it. Trust me I know what we're doing." and clearly something went wrong, it did not work how it was supposed to work. And at the same time, the APEX 2d event was nowhere near as bad as the way Seasons Beatings is run. But nobody holds Seasons Beatings accountable as much as they hold APEX accountable. *discussion trashing Seasons Beatings that I didn't want to type up goes here*
But because APEX was a Smash event and not an FGC event people are holding them to a much higher standard. And I don't know- Well, I know why. That's why. They shouldn't be.
APEX sort of reaffirmed my opinions on the Smash community. When I was still running the Naruto events I was asked all the time to run Smash events. There's no god damn way I'd run a Smash event. Now that being said, not only did it reaffirm my opinions of the Smash community, it reaffirmed the bad opinions and the good opinions. For instance, the Smash community, they got their **** together. Someone says, lets say MarlinPie was in the Smash community, someone says "MarlinPie you gotta be here at 9am." If MarlinPie was part of the Smash community he'd be there at 9am. The Smash community is on time. Like I said, 3-day event 1000 people only 3 hours behind. That is god-like. The 2d community can't do that. "MarlinPie you gotta be here at 10am" MarlinPie shows up at 2 and then complains when he gets DQ'd.

Team Rocket Shirt:
Real talk, I was saying this earlier. Show up to your ****ing matches. I come from a PC gaming community. If you're 15 minutes late from match-time, you are DQ'd. You're out. That's the way it was. They let it slide here in the fighting game community.

Jaxel:
Now if you look at the new 8wayrun Soul Calibur 5 rules that I've already put up, they have specific rules for DQing. I want to make sure that TOs don't feel bad for DQing people. I want to make sure they know you have to DQ people.
Now where was I. Reaffirming my opinions of the Smash community. Like I said, they're on point. They get their **** done. But at the same time, the Smash community is very insular. They play Smash, and they only play Smash.

Team Rocket Shirt:
A couple of them play Marvel.

Jaxel:
Yeah, but the ones who play Marvel left Smash to play Marvel. 6 of the top 8 in Marvel were all from the Smash community, and only 2 of them still played Smash.

Team Rocket Shirt:
On a side note, 6 of the top 8 at APEX also ran Wesker.

Jaxel:
So back to what I was saying, the Smash community only plays Smash. And because of it, they don't want to see anything else. On the stream we had 40 hours of Smash, and 5 hours of FGC. They acted like we had just shot their mothers or something.

TRS:
Until Marvel came out. They were hype for Marvel.

Jaxel:
They were hype for Marvel because it was all Smash players.

TRS:
Like when Alukard came on they were going berserk.

Jaxel:
There's another thing with the Smash community. Lets say you only have 20 TVs for an event. You have 15 TVs for Smash, and you start stratifying your event start-ups so you can start reallocating TVs -- actually if you were smart that's how you'd do it. Brandon was not doing that in the original schedule and that's why we were telling Brandon that it was not going to work. There were no stratified starts. Everything was set to start at the exact same time. Which doesn't make any sense, because you need like 60 TVs at start and by the end you're down to 4 TVs and the rest are completely unused. But back to Smash. The problems with that is Smash doesn't like having people take their TVs away. Let's say you have 15 TVs for Smash, and then once Smash gets down to 8 TVs you put those TVs aside for other games so you can get those tournaments started. The Smash community says "**** that ****, we need these TVs for casuals." This is a tournament. There's no god damn casuals. But the Smash community is so used to having casuals - I'm sorry, any Smash people who are watching. You call them "friendlies." What a dumb ****ing name. **** your friendlies, they're casuals. - But like, you take their casual TVs away and they'll throw a fit. That's generally why I said I will never run a Smash event because they will get uptight about that.

TRS:
You know what they were doing too? They just started picking up their **** and putting it in the next room. They were setting up in our room. Like get the **** out of here, this is our room.

Jaxel:
Like I said they can run tournaments really well. They just can't.. the players, they're a bunch of, you know, juvenile... No I wouldn't say they're delinquents.
But like I said, they can run ****. Their event was run great. What got ****ed up was the 2d ****. The 2d community can't run events. [What happened at]APEX, is not unique to APEX.

TRS:
They can't run events. If we had honestly planned to have even 2 people to run the tournament... For APEX, for the amount that we had, all you needed was 1 person with a laptop on this side, and 1 person with a laptop on this side.

Jaxel:
That's what I'm talking about. Juice Gaming, Brandon, was supposed to be running the 2ds. He wasn't. That's why it fell apart.

TRS:
We had to find people to run the tournament for us. That's when Local Battles stepped their game up. Shoutouts to Local Battles. They did their ****. I have so much respect for them right now. They didn't have a 2nd laptop, so we had to do it on 1.

Jaxel:
Another thing the Smash community does that I don't think they should be doing: they have a rule in their tournaments that allows coaching. You look at the FGC, no coaching allowed on stage. If you look at all the streams there was always an extra player per side just sitting there. Sometimes the coach would sit there and do nothing, they just had a good seat. But if you look at grand finals there was one guy the entire time whispering the entire match, and that guy's ******. The coach is just telling him "He didn't do this, pay attention to that. Pay attention to that." Because of the coaching, because it's specifically in the rules, matches take double the time. Now you have to take 3-4 minutes between each round to discuss things with the coach. In the FGC we're like **** that **** get that next round started.

TRS:
Nah we give them time.

Jaxel:
Yeah a minute at most.

TRS:
I remember reading a statistic saying that in championship games people who take time to think about pressing A to get the next round are most likely to lose.

Jaxel:
The chatroom is saying there is coaching in FGC. There is, but there isn't supposed to be. If someone says "I don't want coaches here" then the TO, most TOs I've seen, will say it's an unspoken rule that you're not supposed to have coaching. It's just that noone enforces it. Sorta like how pressing start in the middle of a match, not everybody enforces it. It's a softban. If you enforce it you're a ****. But that's stil the way it's supposed to be. It's frowned upon.
But, yeah, teams in Smash brothers. Seeing 6 people on stage. You don't need coaching, you have a teammate. You're supposed to coach each other.

TRS:
I remember seeing the reason I quit Smash Brothers multiplied by 4 on the screen. The 4 Metaknight match.
 

MattDotZeb

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
6,122
Location
Quincy, MA
I could've sworn he said "MarlinPie", not "molify".
You're most likely correct. I'm not familiar with players in other communities so I was just doing a bad guess.
Considering MarlinPie is a real player, I'm going to assume that is what he had said.
I'll edit it in to the first post. Thanks!
 

-Cross-

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 12, 2008
Messages
777
Location
NJ
The point about friendlies is interesting. It's true that most tourneys are like 50% serious tournament and 50% glorified smashfest. I think part of this reason is the lack of a good wi-fi community, because training by yourself usually just means you're practicing by yourself unless you have a friend. So friendlies during tourneys are very important for various MU experience and such outside of normal smashfests.
 

Spelt

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
11,841
That is far from true.

Did he not see the smash player win the marvel tournament? :079:
 

Pink Reaper

Real Name No Gimmicks
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
8,333
Location
In the Air, Using Up b as an offensive move
He's definitely on point about the friendlies thing, and I've actually said it before that a lot of tournaments have trouble because smash players just wont stop ****ing playing friendlies(And real talk Jaxel, we call them friendlies, cus we're all friends in our community. No hate in smash ♥)

I will say though the reasons it seems like Smash is so insular, why smash players complain about seeing other events is because for a long time now Smash has been for Smash players by Smash players. There's 0 support from other communities, so players never really integrate in from smash. And the point works for the FGC as well: If a major Marvel series were to run a smash tournament and put it on stream even for a small amount of time, the majority would complain that they're playing smash. Pot, kettle, black.
 

Marc

Relic of the Past
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Messages
16,284
Location
The Netherlands
The smash community has to accept being hours behind schedule, while it's a problem if Marvel doesn't run properly? The schedule just didn't work out for both for various reasons and I'm curious as to dmbrandon's response to this mudslinging. I also don't understand the complaints about smash players only playing smash when we get so much hate from the supposed "real" fighting games. The gameplay for smash is really different and not picking up the other party's game goes both ways here, I'd say. How many Street Fighter players entered smash at APEX?

Furthermore, the community thrives on being able to play friendlies. As long as it doesn't interfere with running the actual tournament there's no reason to frown upon people playing more than their tourney matches. If that's a problem to anyone, that person has probably forgotten what it's like to be an attending player meeting new people from all over the world. I hope the comment about calling friendly matches "casuals" was a joke btw, because that's ********. They even call it "friendlies" in sports.

The man does have a point about coaching and a few other things, but if APEX 2013 is smash only again, that's absolutely fine with me (keep Pokémon though please <3).
 

fkacyan

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
6,226
Diem couldn't run the 2Ds because he was busy running Brawl and dealig with **** like people stealing from Wendy's.
 

bertbusdriver

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 8, 2007
Messages
883
Location
Norcal
But back to Smash. The problems with that is Smash doesn't like having people take their TVs away. Let's say you have 15 TVs for Smash, and then once Smash gets down to 8 TVs you put those TVs aside for other games so you can get those tournaments started. The Smash community says "**** that ****, we need these TVs for casuals." This is a tournament. There's no god damn casuals. But the Smash community is so used to having casuals - I'm sorry, any Smash people who are watching. You call them "friendlies." What a dumb ****ing name. **** your friendlies, they're casuals. - But like, you take their casual TVs away and they'll throw a fit. That's generally why I said I will never run a Smash event because they will get uptight about that.
There weren't a **** ton of partial marvel or sf4ae setups that could have used the TVs, and anyone that needed the setups for a tournament match or pools match could kick ppl off if they were playing friendlies. I never saw anyone go "**** YOU I'M PLAYING A FRIENDLY" when asked to give up the setup for a tournament match. Singles pools for melee could have easily started on time on day 1 since doubles was already in the later stages at that point, but i'm not sure why the APEX TOs failed to make that judgement call.
 

Niko45

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 16, 2008
Messages
3,220
Location
Westchester, NY
On friendlies: I think Smash (at least melee) is a bit different in that the tech barrier is so high that people are constantly "warming up" and then trying to stay warmed up thereafter. Most players can't just show up and play tournament matches instantly or there will just be a ton of dropped combos/edgeguards along with random SDing, choppy movement and general sloppiness.

Smash also does not have nearly the number of big sponsored events regularly like the FGC does so the opportunity to play people from across the country in melee is really rare and friendlies are quite frankly just a big part of the tournament experience. It clearly would make the tournament run much more efficiently to not have them but I think it's a necessary burden to carry when running a tournament.

Coaching: I totally agree. Coaching is potentially extremely powerful and it needs to be banned imo. Your ability to adapt and recognize what's going on in the game needs to be judged as much as anything else in the game and coaching marginalizes this skill (it also delegates some of the skill beyond the players, like if player A has a much better coach than player B despite being less of a player it could effect the outcome).
 

Jaxel

Behind the Curtain...
Premium
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
310
Location
Edison, NJ
I hope the comment about calling friendly matches "casuals" was a joke btw, because that's ********. They even call it "friendlies" in sports.
It was a joke... but even in sports, I have never heard the term "friendlies"... its either "exhibitions" or "scrimmages".

Did he just call the Smash community "on time"?

lmfao
Compared to other fighting game communities, you guys are "on time".
 

Beat!

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
3,214
Location
Uppsala, Sweden
"Casual" is the dumbest name ever. They're friendlies. Deal with it.

Other than that, I kinda agree with most of it. What Niko said about friendlies I agree with as well, though.
 

fkacyan

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
6,226
What was up with people stealing **** from Wendy's? o_O
Some moron took a bunch of water bottles and other **** from them while it was closed, a manager discovered it, and we nearly had the entire tourney kicked out of the venue. That's why Dazwa lost his Saturday sitting down there and Diem had to ask for another volunteer to go down there.

@Jaxel: If this is the case, man the 2d community must be ****ing awful.
 

#HBC | ZoZo

Shocodoro Blagshidect
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
9,801
Location
Land of Nether
The smash community has to accept being hours behind schedule, while it's a problem if Marvel doesn't run properly? The schedule just didn't work out for both for various reasons and I'm curious as to dmbrandon's response to this mudslinging. I also don't understand the complaints about smash players only playing smash when we get so much hate from the supposed "real" fighting games. The gameplay for smash is really different and not picking up the other party's game goes both ways here, I'd say. How many Street Fighter players entered smash at APEX?

Furthermore, the community thrives on being able to play friendlies. As long as it doesn't interfere with running the actual tournament there's no reason to frown upon people playing more than their tourney matches. If that's a problem to anyone, that person has probably forgotten what it's like to be an attending player meeting new people from all over the world. I hope the comment about calling friendly matches "casuals" was a joke btw, because that's ********. They even call it "friendlies" in sports.

The man does have a point about coaching and a few other things, but if APEX 2013 is smash only again, that's absolutely fine with me (keep Pokémon though please <3).
The bolded points are very true. Good post.
 

Cactuar

El Fuego
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
4,820
Location
Philadephia, PA
Coaching has had arguments around it for years. I've always very adamantly stated that it should not be legal during a match. Coaching between matches is okay, but must be brief.

If everyone really wants an official rule made about this, I'm more than willing to include it in the recommended. There will probably be a 2 minute limit between matches for all counterpick decision making and coach/player discussion.

This does not apply to your partner in doubles.
 

Devil Ray

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
1,107
Location
Seoul, South Korea
i don't get the whole "coaching should be banned" aspect of this thread. coaching definitely seems like it's more support than actual coaching since in game adjustments are only made by the player. people are acting like it's a broken tactic.

on a positive note, i think it shows how the smash community is willing to help out and support a friend during crucial play. i don't think coaching breaks the game, especially if both players are allowed a coach.
 

Beat!

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
3,214
Location
Uppsala, Sweden
i don't get the whole "coaching should be banned" aspect of this thread. coaching definitely seems like it's more support than actual coaching since in game adjustments are only made by the player. people are acting like it's a broken tactic.
You're grossly underestimating the impact a good coach can have on the outcome of a match.
 

Cactuar

El Fuego
BRoomer
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
4,820
Location
Philadephia, PA
Grossly is a gross underestimation of his underestimation of the impact a good coach can have on the outcome of a match.


wut
 

AlphaZealot

Former Smashboards Owner
Administrator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 6, 2003
Messages
12,731
Location
Bellevue, Washington
Grossly gross underestimation when especially applied to Brawl. In-game coaching definitely takes the win away from the player and puts it in the hands of the coach, it is less about your ability to read opponents and more about letting someone else do the work for you, which shouldn't be what a fighting game is about (goodbye ability to adapt or critically think!). This effects both Brawl and Melee, I simply think it is even worse for Brawl since the technical execution barrier is lower in most (almost all) cases.

I can't fathom why people are in favor of getting coached in-game unless 1) they are friends will a top player and want an advantage 2) they stink at reading opponents and want to win without putting in the work or 3) they are TO's who think they can't stop coaching (which is false, you can, we've done it for years across various tournaments).
 

Anth0ny

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
4,061
Location
Toronto, Ontario
So back to what I was saying, the Smash community only plays Smash. And because of it, they don't want to see anything else. On the stream we had 40 hours of Smash, and 5 hours of FGC. They acted like we had just shot their mothers or something.
...

Have you seen any streams that are running something that isn't SF/Marvel?

WHERE'S MARVEL

**** TEKKEN

BAWWWWWWWW

MK IS THE WORST GAME EVER

DANSGAME

AS EDITION WHERES MAHVEL

KAPPA

and such. I'm sure the Smash community *****ed when fighting games were on because they wanted to see Smash on the stream. But you are lieing if you think the FGC wouldn't do the same exact thing ten fold if Smash came on during the Seasons Beatings stream, or something.
 

Jaxel

Behind the Curtain...
Premium
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
310
Location
Edison, NJ
I'm sure the Smash community *****ed when fighting games were on because they wanted to see Smash on the stream. But you are lieing if you think the FGC wouldn't do the same exact thing ten fold if Smash came on during the Seasons Beatings stream, or something.
Yes, the FGC does the same thing... but not to the DEGREE that the Smash community did it. The other problem is the Smash community did it with THEIR OWN GAMES. "This isn't Brawl, **** Melee!"
 

#HBC | ZoZo

Shocodoro Blagshidect
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Messages
9,801
Location
Land of Nether
Jaxel, some issues aren't worth your or anyone's time. I do think that the points Marc brought up are legit though.
 

AlphaZealot

Former Smashboards Owner
Administrator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 6, 2003
Messages
12,731
Location
Bellevue, Washington
Next time I'll just ban all the trolls.

Cactuar: MLG has always banned in-game coaching. But even back in 2006 when we only had like 3 people staffing Smash we enforced the coaching rule. It is fairly simple: the crowd typically self enforces, and if someone continues to coach they get the TO involved and can get booted from the venue.
 

felipe_9595

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
1,431
Location
Chile
On friendlies: I think Smash (at least melee) is a bit different in that the tech barrier is so high that people are constantly "warming up" and then trying to stay warmed up thereafter. Most players can't just show up and play tournament matches instantly or there will just be a ton of dropped combos/edgeguards along with random SDing, choppy movement and general sloppiness.

Smash also does not have nearly the number of big sponsored events regularly like the FGC does so the opportunity to play people from across the country in melee is really rare and friendlies are quite frankly just a big part of the tournament experience. It clearly would make the tournament run much more efficiently to not have them but I think it's a necessary burden to carry when running a tournament.

Coaching: I totally agree. Coaching is potentially extremely powerful and it needs to be banned imo. Your ability to adapt and recognize what's going on in the game needs to be judged as much as anything else in the game and coaching marginalizes this skill (it also delegates some of the skill beyond the players, like if player A has a much better coach than player B despite being less of a player it could effect the outcome).
I Agree with you, coaching needs to be banned. Thanks to coaching i have won tournaments matchs because X players tell me what Y player is doing wrong, its a really powerful tool.
 

Dark Hart

Rejected by Azua
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
11,251
Location
Death Row, North Carolina
Yes, the FGC does the same thing... but not to the DEGREE that the Smash community did it. The other problem is the Smash community did it with THEIR OWN GAMES. "This isn't Brawl, **** Melee!"
the FGC did that during the APEX stream... the whole time smash was on...

and from what I'm aware of always has hated smash for reasons which I'm sure you'd agree are pointless...

plus from the outside for a long time most of us assumed there were two streams...

iunno what degree's you're using to measure but the FGC was much worse...

and why can't we hate on our own game? I don't get that...

seriously
 

Signia

Smash Lord
Joined
Feb 5, 2009
Messages
1,157
Yes, the FGC does the same thing... but not to the DEGREE that the Smash community did it. The other problem is the Smash community did it with THEIR OWN GAMES. "This isn't Brawl, **** Melee!"
Jaxel

There is no "us"

We are two separate communities, at least in SoCal

We're so "insular" we don't even play each others' games for the most part

Why would I ever play Brawl? lol
 

Spelt

BRoomer
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
11,841
Yes, the FGC does the same thing... but not to the DEGREE that the Smash community did it. The other problem is the Smash community did it with THEIR OWN GAMES. "This isn't Brawl, **** Melee!"
sf players trash marvel for being easy, capcom players trash non-capcom fighters for not being capcom, 2d players bash 3d players, 3d players bash 2d players.
 
Top Bottom