Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
We play smash 4 now.who's trying to money match my brawl peach on battlefield no timer
Someone who enjoys sticking forks into wall sockets.who's trying to money match my brawl peach on battlefield no timer
ewwww!!We play smash 4 now.
saltSomeone who enjoys sticking forks into wall sockets.
sweet. I'll definitely go there to play him and exchange thoughts on marth etc etc.Shaya's flight has heavy delay and maye not be down till 11 pm, just wanted Sync/Asa to know.
For whoever lives at Sync's sex saloon.
going sonic AND megaman. easy 10$ confirmedF it. Everyone MM me. If our match goes beyond 3.5 minutes I'll give you 5 dollars. If it's Under 3 minutes than you give me 5 dollars.
See, this kind of thinking is terrible. What happens when the person you're playing against you takes the first stock? What happens if they start timing you out?Oh now I see the light! I've been trying to use moves like slingshot to keep my opponent away from me. How dumb!!! But now i realize, the move with like 5 feet of range was meant for approaching. I should move towards my opponent while using slingshot so they can punish me!
Oh I'm all for 3 stock and a longer timer and more stages. Apologies if I gave off a different impression?KJ, You will learn nothing and enjoy nothing by being 2 stocked on 3 viable stages with nothing but diddys. So that is the reason why people like me push for more stocks/more stages is because it allows more characters to be viable and thus furthering our knowledge/"enjoyment" of the game. Doing that then allows for the game to last longer.
Brawl died pretty much in year 5 (it's 7 years old next month) because we had basically 5-7 legal stages, all of whom favored the top 5-7 characters. One of which dominated singles/doubles the entire life span of brawl. The end meta was timeouts and extreme defensive play. All rooted from the fact MK and no stages beyond the typical FD/BF variant existed.
When people Finally see this, this game will surpass all expectations.
No no. I was just explaining. I thought in your last post you were asking what the point of stage/stock discussion is.Oh I'm all for 3 stock and a longer timer and more stages. Apologies if I gave off a different impression?
I only offer my advice because you often speak of your bad matchups as the ones that punish projectile spam or get in easily.Honestly, I have fun playing this smash game or any other no matter who I am playing against, what character they use or however they play. It's just a game to me. If u can't enjoy the game unless it is played in your own specific way, I feel sorry for you. If specific playstyles annoy you or aren't fun that's fine, but complaining about it makes you a scrub. Quit getting so riled up over a video game you big big nerd.
Try playing against Morri-Doom if u want to see what real zoning hell is like. I can only lol when I hear people complain about "camping" in smash.
Nobody's saying never camp, but to have an aggressive game as well. Makes you a well rounded player, and more of a threat.BC plays Villager.
Now, correct me of I'm wrong, but the majority of his horizontally moving attacks are projectiles right? Hell, with a Lloid Rocket, that Slingshot, and that tree to strike fear into approaching foes, I'd say BC would be an idiot of he didn't play like he did with Villager. What's he gonna do when he goes in? Look at the tools Villager has been given and you tell me this man was made to be aggressive and go in.
Villager is one character. Adapt to that ****, complain about someone who has the tools to be aggressive but doesn't, Like Rosalina since people wanna keep using that example.
BC plays other characters, but unless you prove to him you're good enough to where he can't successfuly camp you, tough break.
nr, as well rounded player can be both. And besides that stock tank isn't nearly as effective as a stock tank that can go in kill. No matter what the situation, having an aggro game will not be bad.Well if the other team isn't stupid as all hell they have an aggressive player out to make the kill while the camper stocktanks. Villagers play style is even more effective in doubles with a team mate, so that was a bad point to bring up.
Again, nobodies saying play full aggro vs everyone 100% of the time. Having some form of an aggro game is better than having none, so when situations present themselves you can get the most of it.It's great to be well rounded as a player, but villager has a very hard time filling the aggressive niche. He's playing the character almost completely optimally. But the fact of it is Villager cannot contend with most characters in a 1on1 aggressive onstage battle.
Fair enough. I bet BC would do that if Villager didn't struggle to pull it off so much. I believe he said he's picking up some other character because playing Villager even as well as he does is very hard in that your onstage options are basically trash compared to some of the earlymeta toptiers (which you see a lot of late bracket)Again, nobodies saying play full aggro vs everyone 100% of the time. Having some form of an aggro game is better than having none, so when situations present themselves you can get the most of it.