I don't know why you call it a "policy lynch". The way Gova pounded his vote in was scummy period. Just because he's just as scummy in any other game doesn't mean that it's not a questionable move this time around.
You make it look as if somehow I should've known that the EBR lynch wouldn't work out without my vote. The main problem I have with all this "responsibility" talk and me "not defending myself" is that people seem to think that I'm obliged to use my vote in a manner that the rest of the town could agree with but that's far from true. If I don't believe that lynching EBR is the best course of action then nobody can hold it against me unless you think that I did this to specifically "protect" EBR from a lynch. How is that any worse than Smoth not budging on lynching Swiss or Acrostic, Gova or Traveling Cat not voting at all?
Don't just look at things from your own perspective - there are always two sides to a coin. You say I'm responsible for not getting EBR lynched. But in the same hand I could accuse everybody else to be responsible for not getting Acrostic lynched yesterDay.
Would you join a lynch that you consider largely random if you believe you had a realistic chance to get somebody else lynched - somebody you find more suspect?