Teehee. This makes me scummy? :3
Seriously though. Are you just stating this or...? When I learned how to play mafia, lying was the only scum tell I knew about. Its still probably the biggest turn point from town to scum in my play. Sorry if you find that scummy ._.'!
You don't need to respond to everything in the post... I like to provide context and background in my cases. Not every paragraph is a point that needs to be addressed individually.
Its a distraction to town, the player LAK, and to the moderator as well. Why should I not worry about that along with how scummy it looks when added together with the two posts I mentioned previously? :/.
Why do you care about distraction to the mod?
But more importantly, let's get to your policy on lying. You continue to maintain that Boat is scummy for lying, so let me ask you this: if a player is known for lying even as town, is lying still a scum tell for said person?
Never mind the basic principle of whether town should lie. You know that Ryker has done this kind of stuff as town. You were in Melee Tournament, where he lied about being a Princess. Given that,
why are you continuing to push that Boat is scum because he lied?
Why should I have to ask for reasons when they should be given when you're obviously lying to the town? I don't see a reason why I would have to ask for those reasons. What @ the last sentence?
You don't KNOW that the gambit had no reasoning behind it. Let me put it this way, at the risk of adding WIFOM: even if Ryker were scum, and his only goal were to distract town, would he really do it in such a way? There's OBVIOUSLY a reason behind it, real or fake. You don't ask for it - you instead assume that there is none (which, as I've said, is a terrible assumption) and use it to push the idea of him as scum.
That was the case o_O'! At the time, WL looked like some random guy that jumped on a wagon just for the hell of it and with bad reasons. Thats more scummy than a gambit and two posts lol.
Again, just context.
Threatening? Are you talking about the way I responded or the way you posted it? Was your original question supposed to be threatening? Whoops. I didn't notice! :3. Since it isn't as obvious as I thought it was, I'll say this as well. That was implying that I didn't have more than the gambit, and that I realized that it wasn't enough for a legit vote. This is also why I said "after thinking about it" in the last post you quoted. My fault on that part loool aw well.
So you're saying that it was only when I asked that question that you realized you needed more than just the gambit to justify a vote on Boat. That got you thinking, and you saw 65 and 88, and realized that Boat actually had done other scummy things, so still deserves the scum read. Is that right? Please correct anything that is wrong.
Oh no I didn't catch something that you implied. That makes me scum, right? :D! Oh noooooo you caught me uguu ;-;!
It doesn't make you scum by itself, but it is certainly convenient that you didn't catch it.
How am I backing down? I'm still calling him a scum read and he still has to reply to the pressure that I have on him. Am I just supposed to sit there and make up more stuff while I wait for him or something? :O! You tell me Mr.T-Block!
I was drawing attention to the fact that you moved from "This gambit was in no way townie at all" to "Nope. Not that alone, at least", and did so after you were confronted about it. I suppose it's not so much backing down as it is that your original case on Boat was unsubstantial.
They're weak? Oh nooooooo. I couldn't tell uguu ;-;!
What? No seriously, what? If they weren't attempts to paint the players as scum, then what were they? ._.! You can tell me I'm wrong, but if you don't tell me how I'm wrong, then how am I supposed to do anything about it? Its like you're trying to attack me without giving me a way out, which makes me feel you're not accepting changes on this read
! Thank god I'm not Ryker and thank god that I don't think that tunneling is always a scum tell, because this looks like a preparation for just that! By the way, not both posts were used to paint the player as scum. Please don't imply that, since I didn't say it myself! ;-;! The questions he asked looked like attempts to paint Raziek as scummy for ruining his gambit. Sorry if you don't like it, but its just true to me! ._.! If you're curious, the main question I think thats an attempt at painting Raziek as scum is "What did you profit from interrupting me at that point instead of holding your cards?" Since the aggressive wording makes it look like he thinks Raziek is scummy for it.
Even in this paragraph there's a contradiction:
"
If they weren't attempts to paint the players as scum, then what were they?"
"
By the way, not both posts were used to paint the player as scum"
Yeah, the points are weak. 65 is a part of the gambit. 88 is just... textbook Ryker. You've played more games with him than I have - you should know that kind of thing coming from Ryker is not necessarily an attempt to paint someone as scum.
Honestly I don't mind being lynched for this lol. It'll teach me to fix it for sure, anyways. Being all over the place and over-exaggerating things are problems I have as a player in any faction, which is why people say "Being Joey" or things like that instead of townie for me. Its part of being bad I guess. That and reacting before my reads are fully developed I guess. Either or.
./AtE :3!
Yeeeeeeeeeee!
And yeah, cut the AtE. It's annoying.
Vote is going to stay here.