I politely request that you specifically answer each of the questions in this post so that it is easily visible, as well as posting any response or opinion you may form like normal.
We do not have to throw out the idea, but it is foolish to act on the idea as well. From your opinion on No Lynching, you seem hesitant to mislynch a townie. Yet you narrow the list of people you are willing to lynch based on another player's (with an alignment I assume you do not know) remarks that he knows one player is mafia and another player is his scumbuddy.
Making a 100% random guess on a group of people when there are more townies than mafia with no information to follow is a bad choice. Statistically you are likely to land on a townie.
It's by use of information that we make more appropriate deductions to try and get rid of the mafia. The only information we have thus far is the whole strange thing between Omni and CK essentially. You have been linked to it as well, but not in a way CK has, and especially with Omni's latest post it makes me even more unsure that you are involved. Sooo... if we make a guess outside of Omni/CK and maybe you, we're guessing in the dark. No one else has done anything even remotely close to making them seem like mafia. That would be a bad guess on our part.
So, if we we're to lynch, it should be either CK, Omni, or Tom. Any vote potentially removes a mafia member, or gets us more information on the situation at hand and be more ready for D2. If we vote CK, we run a high risk of voting off a lynchee, having Omni accomplish his goal. If we vote Omni we potentially lose information if he has any (though he wouldn't have any if he is a lyncher as in the bad case of voting CK), and we wouldn't have learned if there is a thing behind this mess of posts he's done. Option 1 and 2 are similar choices, as only one or the other (CK a lynchee or Omni having intel) can be true, but Option 1 carries a greater risk that we shouldn't do at the moment. This leaves Tom, a relatively safe vote in this mess here. Tom is not only slightly connected to the whole Omni triangle, but is quick to question anyone on their reasoning and votes, especially me, the only person who has figured to vote Tom so far.
Voting for CK is the most dangerous option at the moment
Voting for Omni doesn't have anything bad that can come of it, but it can potentially be unfavorable to us
Voting for Tom is the safest vote for a lynch
Voting No Lynch is the safest vote overall at this time
Who are the "a lot of people siding with" Omni?
Why does the fact that "a lot of people" (needs to be proven) agree with Omni make his remarks any more legitimate?
Why do you still limit your focus on what Omni has done?
Considering Omni is pushing for CK to get lynched, and CK has consistently had the most votes for a while now...
I'm not saying Omni is legit, I won't believe he is until I see more proof.
Because it's the only thing we have to play off of so far, especially considering it's only D1.
You do not need to limit your Day 1 focus based on what Omni has said. For one thing, he and Chaco, as townies, destroyed the Town in Disney mafia. I can easily draw parallels with his play in this game with his play in Disney. He is absolutely convinced that he is right, even to go as far as to carelessly remark that he "knows" CK is mafia and for everyone to "trust" him. That is poor play. Then he comments that I'm CK's scumbuddy, and everyone takes it seriously, based on his remark that he "knows" CK is mafia. I'm surprised he did this, because it is terrible play. He seems not to realize the implications he is making by linking those two statements.
And what makes it that you solely decide if it's terrible play or not? No one knows what's going on for certain, people are talking about it, people are suspecting various things. He seems to be on to something. We just won't know if he's legit or not until later on.
Do you understand what a false dilemma is? I directed those comments earlier towards Hylian, but now I see that they do not apply to him, and as you continue to make these points, they terribly apply to you.
NOTHING leaves you with two options. That is a jump in logic that you cannot seem to recognize.
What leaves you with the only options of No Lynching or lynching me? NOTHING.
What narrows your choices between No Lynching or lynching Omni/CK/Tom, now just Tom? I'm not asking for the reasoning you provided that narrows it down from the other 2 to just me. I'm asking you what eliminates all other players from the equation and leaves you with these 3? I hope you recognize that the answer is straight up nothing.
I pretty much explain this above.
