Yeah, I quoted
KCCHIEFS27
because his image response was funny. Big deal. I laughed. Get over it. People can find things funny and still be serious about the topic at large. If you can't separate that then that's on you, not me.
Man, laugh at one thing semi-related to something people care about and everyone loses their minds! Where is a Joker meme template when you need it.
Okay, so since people can't seem to understand the tone of the sentence structure AND I'm often bad at English sentencing, allow me to clarify step-by-step.
Do you see how I quoted the image, then responded with the 'Pff okay that was funny.' bit? Yeah, that means I'm responding to the image being funny. The idea that this image meme exist is amusing to me, and on top of that it was a funny response for someone to make in response to a theory they think is outlandish. It had nothing to do with
The Anigriffin
or their post other than it was a response to it. Once again, context matters, and the context here is that I found the image response funny but not necessarily the OP.
The reason I apologized is because I knew that if I didn't say something it would seem I was laughing at him and his idea rather than the image response, but clearly it wasn't worded well enough. I would have figured if I just quoted his OP and laughed at that instead of the image, the idea would have gotten across that I found his idea ridiculous and hilarious vs just finding the image hilarious, but clearly that wasn't good enough for the citizens here.
I never told anyone how they should feel. I told Ani that he shouldn't let what people say stop him from posting his idea. Quit twisting things and trying to strawman. You are trying to build me as someone who laughs at people's genuine ideas and arguments when I've ever only taken them seriously and probably too seriously to be honest. I'm sorry, I'm not this evil being who laughs at people and calls them stupid or ridiculous. I've already stated multiple times that I'm eager to hear the theory regardless of it's context or how or where it's posted or in spite of what others might think about it. That alone should be enough proof of my position, but suddenly everyone is trigger-happy because 'You made fun of my friend's idea! How dare you!' even when I never did anything of the sort.
You called people douchebags. That is attacking someone instead of addressing the actual issue in a polite and respectful manner. That is labeling them as something so you can justify your position better. It's both partial strawmanning and using an adhominem. Also you labeled me as 'rumor police' earlier when all I did was point out that Sabi was not involved and offered a way to keep her name clear of things she is not involved with. Yet again, you seem to be almost unable of having an intense conversation when things get a small bit heated without insulting people and on top of it YOU are the one who started this session to go after people who merely expressed themselves.
No one did anything of the sort.
KCCHIEFS27
expressed his opinion on the idea in a humorous manner. He is allowed to do that.
I stated that I found that response humorous and apologized for doing so when I didn't need to so that I could properly address Anigriffin's post and attempt to make it clear that despite me finding that response humorous, I'm still interested over all.
Now, here is an idea: how about we allow people to express themselves however they choose so long as it's not attacking someone (which oddly enough, Datboigeno does fall under the attacking while KCChiefs does not) and get over our own collective hubris?
Or if you would rather stay a part of 'jump-the-gun' culture and continue sharpening your pitchforks whilst staring menacingly, at least let me know so I can go ahead and stop by Hobby Lobby and Home Depot to get you some tar and feathers expenses paid.
/
