D
Deleted member
Guest
This is officially the coolest goddamn thing on the internet. I'll weeb out for TTGL anyday.
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is officially the coolest goddamn thing on the internet. I'll weeb out for TTGL anyday.
That's standard with any subscription service.Nintendo screwed me over two months ago. I paid for a three month membership back in December and after my three month membership expired, I was charged for a renewal automatically, which is not what I wanted. I forgot to turn the stupid automatic renewal off. I was so pissed! I turned it off, that way it never does it again against my behalf.
And Smithy. I believe he still could be alive. There is a video about that:I'd wanna see Booster come back too.
Yeah. Also a 3 minute phone conversation will reverse the charges as well, no biggieThat's standard with any subscription service.
I mean, as much as I love nintendo's games, their infrastructure is some of the worst **** I've ever seen. Just look as the switch's UI for feck's sake. Your choices of background color are white and....wait for it....black. The end. That's it. The 3ds had a dozen colors with TONS of cool themed backgrounds both for free and for purchase, yet after 2 years it feels like those idiots at nintendo have only put in the dead minimum. This is their current flagship system and that's all they can do? Why not at least blue and red backgrounds?! It's pathetic when you think about it. And don't even get me started on the mediocrity of their online. Lemme just second your points. If they expect us to pay for the online, then how about at least a freaking token amount of investment?! Greedy little ********.I'm surprised they're forcing me to ****ing pay extra for said online acess when I already paid plenty of money for the game, and especially when they never did this with their online before, and especially when it's as bad as it is. It's the same online we've gotten for years. From the DS to the 3Ds to the Wii and Wii U, and it's hardly improved at all, and they STILL want you to pay extra per year for the same **** with almost no improvements/enhancements. It's never not gonna be a ****ty practice, and I sure as hell ain't gonna be pleased to pay extra for something as basic as downloading levels in a game I already PAID FOR when I barely have any money as it is. Could have spent that money on an indie game or some lunch, but nope, I have to use it just to access half of a game I already purchased because it hinges on a feature that they used to offer for free year after year with no added improvements to make up for it.
Interesting of course and me to as i child i never thought about it twice. However with this video i can actually see this as a reason for SMRPG 2 : Revenge of Smithy or whatever. With technology and what not at its current stage i have no doubt it would be beautiful. Our only hope is that Nintendo knows about this and is doing something about it but i guess we shall wait and see or maybe nothing will really ever happen with it. This coming up E3 would be a dream come true IF a Banjo/Geno reveal along with a w/ remake and/OR new entry en SMRPG and/or Banjo-Kazooie. I hope your reading this Nintendo officials. lolAnd Smithy. I believe he still could be alive. There is a video about that:
So SourceGaming did another poll for Smash Ultimate most wanted DLC. Banjo got first place. Guess who got fifth?SourceGaming did a poll on DLC characters and made a video on the Top 50.
Lots of backhanded comments though regarding him being a “bandwagon” pick and saying people want him because of his design. Which is funny considering he’s ranked pretty high on polls for years now and the character that came before him Steve only shot up in popularity in less than a year after DLC “”leaks”” lol Also the comment about SMRPG not being readily available even though through VC and the SNES Classic it’s had multiple re-releases.So SourceGaming did another poll for Smash Ultimate most wanted DLC. Banjo got first place. Guess who got fifth?
Yeah, true, but that's unneeded perspective and bias. The numbers are what matter here. I really don't care how SG thinks and how he views Geno + his fan base. The amount of outcry people have for seeing him return, something that's been consistently going on for over a decade, speaks for itself.Lots of backhanded comments though regarding him being a “bandwagon” pick and saying people want him because of his design. Which is funny considering he’s ranked pretty high on polls for years now and the character that came before him Steve only shot up in popularity in less than a year after DLC “”leaks”” lol
Oh yeah for sure. I just thought it was funny he still went out of his way to make obviously biased statements like that.Yeah, true, but that's unneeded perspective and bias. The numbers are what matter here. I really don't care how SG thinks and how he views Geno + his fan base. The amount of outcry people have for seeing him return, something that's been consistently going on for over a decade, speaks for itself.
Yeah, he does this for multiple characters, and it's frankly pretty unnecessary. No one is going to want to view his video for his opinions when the main focus is the final tally. He can post his opinions separate of that, if at all. I personally discourage it. It's an incredibly unprofessional look, and if he's trying to be a 'source' of any kind, he cannot show his biases so blatantly. It's terrible journalism and leaves a sour taste. People will retaliate because of his personal views, positive or negative, and it's what can ultimately break your coverage. I'm honestly kind of baffled that he thought this was fine, no matter whether I agree or disagree with any of his opinions. It's just begging to ignite controversy and squabbles for no good reason, drawing attention away from the main point.Oh yeah for sure. I just thought it was funny he still went out of his way to make obviously biased statements like that.
Especially with this being an objective poll of people’s desires. It just seems really tacky to me. Honestly who knows if he did it with the intent of drawing people to his video to get in Internet arguments about the things he said.Yeah, he does this for multiple characters, and it's frankly pretty unnecessary. No one is going to want to view his video for his opinions when the main focus is the final tally. He can post his opinions separate of that, if at all. I personally discourage it. It's an incredibly unprofessional look, and if he's trying to be a 'source' of any kind, he cannot show his biases so blatantly. It's terrible journalism and leaves a sour taste. People will retaliate because of his personal views, positive or negative, and it's what can ultimately break your coverage. I'm honestly kind of baffled that he thought this was fine, no matter whether I agree or disagree with any of his opinions. It's just begging to ignite controversy and squabbles for no good reason, drawing attention away from the main point.
Screw those edgy turds. I'll just assume "silent tiger" mode and sit quietly while they flap their gums. Then if Geno gets in, I will relish the amount of crow I get to ram down their throats....And yeah I also think it's the flavor of the week to poo poo on Geno honestly. Edgy bandwagon kids.
In all honesty, this kind of behavior is what made me unsub from their channel. I still read their translated articles from time to time, but when it comes to speculation... they drop the ball pretty hard. I think they care more about "being right" that characters like Sora, Banjo and Geno won't be in than actually wanting characters like Erdrick and Steve. Which makes it kinda funny considering they "called out" Geno bandwagoners.Yeah, he does this for multiple characters, and it's frankly pretty unnecessary. No one is going to want to view his video for his opinions when the main focus is the final tally. He can post his opinions separate of that, if at all. I personally discourage it. It's an incredibly unprofessional look, and if he's trying to be a 'source' of any kind, he cannot show his biases so blatantly. It's terrible journalism and leaves a sour taste. People will retaliate because of his personal views, positive or negative, and it's what can ultimately break your coverage. I'm honestly kind of baffled that he thought this was fine, no matter whether I agree or disagree with any of his opinions. It's just begging to ignite controversy and squabbles for no good reason, drawing attention away from the main point.
Brought this over from the Banjo thread. Its not really Geno related but interesting none the less. Thoughts? :DWell, well, well, what have we here?
There was a problem fetching the tweet
Eh? ... Ehhhhhhh?Brought this over from the Banjo thread. Its not really Geno related but interesting none the less. Thoughts? :D
Reasonable. I was expecting an 8-bit costume of a SMRPG character to appear as part of the new content in the Direct, and I was really expecting Boshi to appear as an 8-bit costume.Also was it unreasonable of me to expect some sort of Mario RPG type reference and or Easter egg in the MM2 direct? They've been dropping those around lately.
I hope we get SMRPG costumes if the Mystery Mushroom comes back. It's not over for the Mystery Mushroom until the game is out and datamined + the hypothetical DLC cycle for the game has concluded, but I can't help but be a bit concerned. I really wanted to experience those.Reasonable. I was expecting an 8-bit costume of a SMRPG character to appear as part of the new content in the Direct, and I was really expecting Boshi to appear as an 8-bit costume.
I mean... it's not wrong to give your opinions on the characters per se, but there are quite a few times where it feels like they're trying to do exactly that - pass these opinions off as facts. Calling Geno "the bandwagoning king" kind of crosses that line. Kinda like how a few "insiders" kept saying that Steve was more deserving than Banjo or Erdrick is more than Sora just to provoke an emotional response. People are entitled to their opinions on these matters, but that's all they ultimately are - opinions.Personally I don't have anything against Source Gaming stating their opinions on some characters. It would be a very boring video if it were just listing statistics, and it's much better journalism than if they were passing their opinions off as facts.
I certainly disagree with some of his opinions, but if I were to make a video like that, I would certainly express my thoughts on each character.
Personally I don't think bandwagoning is a derogatory term. I didn't feel anything said was an attack towards the Geno fandom.I mean... it's not wrong to give your opinions on the characters per se, but there are quite a few times where it feels like they're trying to do exactly that - pass these opinions off as facts. Calling Geno "the bandwagoning king" kind of crosses that line. Kinda like how a few "insiders" kept saying that Steve was more deserving than Banjo or Erdrick is more than Sora just to provoke an emotional response. People are entitled to their opinions on these matters, but that's all they ultimately are - opinions.
As long as people acknowledge that, I think we're all good.
It isn't inherently, no, but I can see why it'd be taken that way. A lot of Geno's vocal hate base use 'bandwagoning' in a very negative connotation, as if it's wrong to perceive a character as having a chance for Smash and thus, hopping on the support wagon. It's much like with Erdrick. People have supported him for a long time, but they didn't really see him as having a chance and resigned to silence. With the idea of him seeming more likely, the fan base became far more vocal.Personally I don't think bandwagoning is a derogatory term. I didn't feel anything said was an attack towards the Geno fandom.
Personally I don't think bandwagoning is a derogatory term. I didn't feel anything said was an attack towards the Geno fandom.
Like I've said before, I feel this is because they care about being right regarding characters like Erdrick and Steve. I remember the livestream post-final direct, where they spent a good ten minutes or so mocking the people who fell for the Grinch Leak and saying that "Minecraft is so popular, there's no way there won't be any content in Smash Ultimate". This is clearly baiting, if you ask me.It isn't inherently, no, but I can see why it'd be taken that way. A lot of Geno's vocal hate base use 'bandwagoning' in a very negative connotation, as if it's wrong to perceive a character as having a chance for Smash and thus, hopping on the support wagon. It's much like with Erdrick. People have supported him for a long time, but they didn't really see him as having a chance and resigned to silence. With the idea of him seeming more likely, the fan base became far more vocal.
However, when it comes to Geno, people have found this stereotype that none of Geno's fans have played SMRPG and are just supporting him because their favorite Youtubers tell them to. I cannot for the life of me figure out where that came from when 99% of the Geno fans I've met have played the game and genuinely like the character. Whatever the case, they use that and bandwagoning in a negative light, and SG's remarks definitely come off that way. It's really... not cool to do that, especially when other fandoms do that and it's perfectly fine. What makes Geno's different from Erdrick's? Both of their fans are entirely valid.
I do think in some cases there's a bit of a 'trendy' thing that gets some people into it, which is true in a few cases, but most geno fans i've seen have been around for quite a long time.. if anything, I have a lot of respect for dedicated geno and isaac fans, including for hanging in there after all these years. :OIt isn't inherently, no, but I can see why it'd be taken that way. A lot of Geno's vocal hate base use 'bandwagoning' in a very negative connotation, as if it's wrong to perceive a character as having a chance for Smash and thus, hopping on the support wagon. It's much like with Erdrick. People have supported him for a long time, but they didn't really see him as having a chance and resigned to silence. With the idea of him seeming more likely, the fan base became far more vocal.
However, when it comes to Geno, people have found this stereotype that none of Geno's fans have played SMRPG and are just supporting him because their favorite Youtubers tell them to. I cannot for the life of me figure out where that came from when 99% of the Geno fans I've met have played the game and genuinely like the character. Whatever the case, they use that and bandwagoning in a negative light, and SG's remarks definitely come off that way. It's really... not cool to do that, especially when other fandoms do that and it's perfectly fine. What makes Geno's different from Erdrick's? Both of their fans are entirely valid.
How people interpret a term that by itself has no negative connotation is on them. I know Geno fans have had a rough time, but you can't expect to be tiptoed around with careful wording all the time.It isn't inherently, no, but I can see why it'd be taken that way. A lot of Geno's vocal hate base use 'bandwagoning' in a very negative connotation, as if it's wrong to perceive a character as having a chance for Smash and thus, hopping on the support wagon. It's much like with Erdrick. People have supported him for a long time, but they didn't really see him as having a chance and resigned to silence. With the idea of him seeming more likely, the fan base became far more vocal.
Oh c'mon that's just an opinion. I'm a Sora fan and I have zero issue with that. DQ has sold more than KH.Then there's the one with Sora, "Although I made the copyright joke I actually don’t think that’s what will prevent Sora, I honestly feel it is simply that Dragon Quest is the bigger, more iconic, series. Sorry Sora fans.". Like, if this kind of thing was posted on Smashboards, a lot of people would classify it as a kind of troll post.
It's not a matter of "having issues" or not, I simply expect better from an official news source. Like, if it was some anonymous dude on GameFaqs, I wouldn't bat an eye.Oh c'mon that's just an opinion. I'm a Sora fan and I have zero issue with that. DQ has sold more than KH.
I think in the way that he said it that there's most definitely an implication there that people who are fans of the character/voted for him did so out of some bandwagon popularity or because of some superficial reason like his design (which he brought up) without actually knowing or liking the character. And again context is important because he really didn't say that for any of the newer names being thrown around due to speculation. It honestly reeks of negative bias whether doing so was unconscious on his part or not. To me it was the fact that the statement about bandwagoning was paired with the obviously incorrect statement about SMRPG not being very available. Those together give off a sentiment that "People voting for Geno didn't play the game because how could they? So they're obviously just voting for him because it's popular to do". Tbh I wonder if it has to do with the fact that he's European. SMRPG hadn't been available there until the VC ports so maybe he dismissed the fact that there are a ton of people from elsewhere in the world that did play the SNES version in the years after its original release.How people interpret a term that by itself has no negative connotation is on them. I know Geno fans have had a rough time, but you can't expect to be tiptoed around with careful wording all the time.
Oh c'mon that's just an opinion. I'm a Sora fan and I have zero issue with that. DQ has sold more than KH.
Source Gaming is not official in any sense of the word.It's not a matter of "having issues" or not, I simply expect better from an official news source.
I didn't get that from what he said, but now I understand your point. Thanks for that.I think in the way that he said it that there's most definitely an implication there that people who are fans of the character/voted for him did so out of some bandwagon popularity or because of some superficial reason like his design (which he brought up) without actually knowing or liking the character. And gain context is important because he really didn't say that for any of the newer names being thrown around due to speculation. It honestly reeks of negative bias whether doing so was unconscious on his part or not. To me it was the fact that the statement about bandwagoning was paired with the obviously incorrect statement about SMRPG not being very available. Those together give off a sentiment that "People voting for Geno didn't play the game because how could they? So they're obviously just voting for him because it's popular to do". Tbh I wonder if it has to do with the fact that he's European. SMRPG hadn't been available there until the VC ports so maybe he dismissed the fact that there are a ton of people from elsewhere in the world that did play the SNES version in the years after its original release.
the one that was between o and a stumped me for the longest time. It took me and a friend literal months to figure it out.In SMRPG, what did y'all think the first time you encountered the 3 Musty Fears and they told you where to find the flags?
I needed a walkthrough to find the flags.
Borrow mine!the one that was between o and a stumped me for the longest time. It took me and a friend literal months to figure it out.
the wooden flower was obvious, the green bed we just literally went to every single area in the game that had beds, found it after about 15 minutes. but the o and a? yeah we were lost. We started thinking we had to talk to some NPC who's dialog had it hidden or something, where if we talked to just the right one suddenly the flag would just appear.
I can at least say we found them without the need for any sort of guides....though tbh since we played back when it was first released and neither of us had computers(not that it'd be on the internet anyway) and many game magazines didn't cover everything, we kinda didn't have any choice.
Though IMO it was more fun back then because of that, Same is true for the crazy rumors during those days, specifically the n64 days. I kinda miss when all the insane fake rumors like "L is real, get to the top of tick tock clock when it's frozen to unlock a secret room" or "how to beat the running man/unlock a special dungeon/get the triforce" existed. and since the internet was in it's early days then still too, no one really truly fact checked much on game rumors(of course people now don't actually fact check on anything actually important...) so we all believed these ridiculous game rumors and tried them all.
Now no one even attempts to make any crazy rumors for any games anymore, because most developers will debunk any wild rumors up front, and gamers themselves hack and mod so much now that they either find everything in the game by hacking it....or just mod any of the crazy stuff they want in.
EDIT: On a side note, I feel it's finally time I changed my pit avatar that I've had since the brawl days. Does anyone have any suggestions for a Geno related one?