Doctor Lucky
Smash Cadet
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2018
- Messages
- 48
Oh no doubt. I always keep that "...but this may all just be a consolation prize for Geno not being included" idea in mind, but given the current "Everyone is here" K. Rool, Ridley, and Simon in Smash (all highly requested fan favorites) in addition to all the SMRPG after over a decade since the last major mention of Geno (which was also removed later on in the game's remake), it's all very, very suspicious, even taking into consideration that this is merely a 'consolation prize' for Smash. I'd understand them putting a few easter eggs in the game he's unfortunately not in, but with the latest nod of the game in a completely separate game about Yoshi sort puts that idea into major question. Why would they make a SMRPG reference in any other game but Smash Brothers if all these nods and references are supposed to be consolation prizes for Geno's absence from Smash?Wow, I didn't realize it was referenced that much. That is awfully suspicious. Looks to me like they're trying to gauge people's opinions on SMRPG. I just hope all these little easter eggs isn't Sakurai saying "I'm sorry I couldn't get Geno in, have these instead." I know nobody wants to hear that, but unfortunately it's something we have to keep in mind.
It's worth mentioning that Square has gone on record in saying that they desire and have plans to bring their older games back into the limelight on the Switch (games including SMRPG), so this idea of a re-release or a remaster isn't completely unfounded. As such, the idea of Geno being included in Smash in order to herald a slew of Square RPGs being released on the Switch isn't that far fetched of an idea. Square essentially gets paid to have their products advertised via Geno's DLC sales, they get their games on the Switch in order to be purchased, and depending on how much effort they put in porting the games, it wouldn't cost them much to do so.