- Joined
- Aug 13, 2001
- Messages
- 34,385
- Location
- Cull Hazard
- NNID
- Irene4
- 3DS FC
- 1203-9265-8784
- Switch FC
- SW-7567-8572-3791
They never literally said the ballot was only for Smash 4 either. What they said was "we'll consider using the character for Smash 4 DLC" but also noted future games. Problem is, the future game bit was only in the JP presentation/site. If they had been more clear about future games in the US and EU, this wouldn't be an issue. Technically, that's the only actual lie they did, by omitting key information to two regions. But they were at least clear on the consideration part, so there was no rule that the ballot was for Smash 4 itself. That's actually implying future games would be applicable, since how else would you use it, so it's most likely they thought it was enough information to get the point across, and didn't actually translate. They lied but technically didn't lie either. It's wierd.I don't think anyone was implying they lied for malicious reasons, but rather, it could have been to conceal that they were working on a new Smash game (which we now know is true with Ultimate) and the ballot was instead for Sm4sh DLC.
People would've understood it better. But even then, they did not promise ballot = Smash 4 DLC, they just worded Bayonetta's stuff weirdly.
They didn't really conceal they were working on a new game either. As I noted above, they actually did say "future games", so they outright made it clear it was applicable beyond Smash 4. Which is where the confusion went in.