that doesn¨t change the fact though that Square Enix is usually less "stingy" when it comes to DLC vs base game.
Compared to what? Themselves? They're still stingy with DLC compared to any other company. SNK literally handed them 50 songs. Square is one of the stingiest in Smash atm.
Old games they already had ported elsewhere. Free money.
while also bombarding the console with RPGs (Bravely Default 2 and Trials of Mana coming up, where the former is Switch exclusive)
Cool. What does this have to do with Smash?
Yes, I am biased. But I think with how their relationship has blossomed since Cloud got in and those DLC examples, I don¨t think its that impossible to get Geno and Sepiroth in some form.
A third party company puts games on a console: "Their relationship has blossomed". What? Sorry I don't quite understand this logic.
Regardless of how good or not good relations are with a company, that doesn't mean they'll get more than one slot on this season.
That's fair. While FF7 as a sub-franchise is pretty epic, I agree that FF7, the original game, is HIGHLY overrated. I was just having a discussion with my brother over lunch that FF7 and FF10 were pretty much the high points of SE's career so that's why they're trying so hard to milk that success.
FF6 was sadly very underrated (it got the Earthbound treatment of being underrated at release but being greatly praised later on) and SMRPG's timing was just downright awful.
FF7 I think was just the start of the 3D age, so it's what got a lot of hype for being "so different", even though it was still in that super awkward time of 3D. 10 was when it got "perfected" methinks since it was on the PS2, which by that point 3D games were definitely more understood.
Also, when you say 10 was the "high point", do you mean in terms of game design or what the fans enjoyed? I never hear people talking about FF10 (besides Tidus's laugh), even though it was my first FF (and one of my favorites, though I still want Geno well before I'd want any FF rep). Everything usually gets overshadowed by FF7 and to a lesser degree, FF6 (and some of the boomers who still call it FF3).
Fire Emblem might have 8 characters and Legend of Zelda has 6.. But taking the number of songs, assist theories, stages and items, Legend of Zelda beats Fire Emblem by a long shot, especially concidering the only thing Fire Emblem have in item supply is a killing edge and three assists trophies.
But at the end of the day, fighters are all that really matters when you consider 100% of players, super hardcore and casual, are affected by what fighters are in the game. Once you start getting into stages, competitive players will often go for BF/FD versions and don't play with items on, which makes the stage, item, and AT points absolutely moot. Songs are nice and all too, but they simply don't compare to a playable fighter. You shouldn't have to look at anything besides fighters to know Fire Emblem is
extremely overrepresented, and it makes it so much worse when a lot of them play very similarly (3 are virtually identical to one another, 1 is different, but then has an echo that mirrors him and the 3 that are identical, all have swords as primary weapons, etc). We know that you love FE, but it really doesn't need you to defend it. I mean if songs are *that* important, then FF/KoF is definitely overrepresented, right?
Anyway, I really don't give a crap if Sephiroth gets in, but Geno deserves the spot more if only one of them can get it. FF7 is already represented, and it sure would suck to have a character come with a stage and 2 more songs without much of anything else. I just don't see him getting in, but I also do see Square wanting to circlejerk on FF7 harder, as usual.