D
Deleted member
Guest
I hardly think I'm cherrypicking when I'm not using that one point to devalue your entire argument, especially when mostly I'm in agreement with you that Mallowdemon is still in limbo after three months - I just don't think that from where we're sitting, the amount of time that has passed is a good argument and I gave my reasoning. For the record, my feelings on when Sans was negotiated for are based on Toby's accounts of his journey to Japan on Twitter - nothing definitive, I just think the guy unwittingly left something of a paper trail.Don't cherrypick it. I already noted that it slowly makes it look likely as time goes on. If you're not going to reply to the full point being made, you're vastly misinterpreting it. Yes, it's a pretty hefty amount of time right now.
It's not misinformation. The longer it goes without a reveal, the more it casts doubt on it. Extreme I can concur is not the best term, but that's actually been how people are acting(which is silly, but I'm actually quoting what people are treating like it's fully debunked). 4 months is a lot of time. While I don't think it means that much, I can't blame people for finding it more likely to be fake as time goes on. Costumes are not the same as characters either, and many believe they take a lot less time(a full character takes as little as 6 months, and that's for non-Echoes to our knowledge). Time does matter.
We don't know when the Sans costume was actually negotiated for enough for it to be a real factor, though(we just know it had to be finished by when the episode was recorded, and that's not a useful timezone otherwise. We're missing the first half of teh puzzle). So I can't take that into consideration as evidence. I'll remove the word extreme, but it's not really as off as people are making it. Basically, we lack any information on negotiations and when the costumes got started for it to be a real factor. It's understandable nobody knows what to think in this case.
Also, as I noted, I want the actual tweet, not a quick quote of part of it. That matters for a lot of people because many treat it as a death sentence. I don't, but some do. It's pretty big evidence against the leak no matter how you slice it. "Nowhere serious" can easily mean "absolutely nothing was negotiated for in the end" just as much as "we didn't mean a playable character". It's got more than one interpretation. I don't think it's PR jargon, though. It's closer to more of an NDA specific way to deny anything happened despite it did, if the leak remains true. If it somehow means we could still get Doomslayer, then it's not about jargon. It's about directly lying to not let out information(which is the point behind an NDA. Deny everything is one way to fully do so).
Also, I don't think that there was ever a tweet that said "we talked to Nintendo and nothing serious happened", but there was an interview that was tweeted by various speculation news outlets.