Ryu Shimazu
Smash Master
Ninja in FF1 is lulz.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Blackbelt even more so.Ninja in FF1 is lulz.
Confession.Some one here never played a NES-era RPG.
It is, but when it gets compared to SM64 it gets to me.Say what you will, but I still found Galaxy to be one of the best platformers out there.
Really? Why not? How can you not say that the levels were quite interesting? Click Clock Wood comes to mind. I didn't like Banjo Tooie's as much as BK though.Plus I really didn't like BK's level design.
I thought we were talking about the 64 games?True, but I was talking about NES-era games.
I honestly don't think its as hard as you think.And the gravity-based platforming.
Really? In what way? I was hyped about the Green Star challenge but it still was quite boring. The only exciting one was the Mario Sunshine level.I'd saying that going through the main story is pretty linear but after that it opens up.
Wow. I can't believe it. You must be sticking to your PS roots.I actually hated Goldeneye.
I played it years and years after it came out only to find confusing and boring levels with wobbly controls and incredibly boring game play.
And yes, I played mulitplayer with a group of three other friends. We all agreed that it sucked.
Oh and did I mention that I hated the pacing of Galaxy? There was too much unnecessary crap getting in the way of playing such as the game telling you 120 times that there is a green star comet. God that warning siren was so annoying!Yeah, true that.
lol, just pulling your chain but you did say several times you don't like games that tell you to figure it out and you use games such as SM64 and OOT to back it up. They were challenging but nothing like what you say they were. And you enjoy the current games better which are easier and feel like they play themselves anyway.Now that's just insulting. I do enjoy thinking and puzzles but when a game gives you absolutely little to no information on what you're supposed to be doing that's just bull.
My friend didn't like the game because you couldn't grab ledges. I think its a bad reason to not like the game but w/eAm I seriously the only one who found BJ to be average?
I thought you said that you think games with the same engine can feel different?Just because I think that games that use different engines can have a different feel doesn't mean that I'm not "hardcore" as people like to say these days.
Now you changed your idea. Before you said that the game's concept didn't age wellHere's the thing, I enjoy older games but I don't let my nostalgia blind me from the fact that some games just didn't age well or aren't nearly as good today as they were then. For example, I love Final Fantasy I do death. It was the first RPG I ever played and finished all on my own without a strategy guide or any outside help. But does that mean it's still as awesome as it was back then? No.
Yeah, NES/SNES RPGs were really bad with that.Confession.
We should probably drop the whole "M64 VS Galaxy" thing.It is, but when it gets compared to SM64 it gets to me.
What can I say? To me Banjo Kazooie was just average.Really? Why not? How can you not say that the levels were quite interesting? Click Clock Wood comes to mind. I didn't like Banjo Tooie's as much as BK though.
It's my fault for not clarifying that, sorry.I thought we were talking about the 64 games?
To come up with that and program it? It's no easy task.I honestly don't think its as hard as you think.
I never got 100% on any Mario games but given the amount of optional levels that's what I felt.Really? In what way? I was hyped about the Green Star challenge but it still was quite boring. The only exciting one was the Mario Sunshine level.
Or maybe the game just genuinely didn't age well.Wow. I can't believe it. You must be sticking to your PS roots.
In retrospect I do have to say that M64 and OoT didn't quite reach those levels, I was mostly thinking of 8-bit and 16-bit games. And I don't think that modern games play themselves at all. But given that from what you've said it sounds like you've had minimal experience with modern games so I'm not even sure if that statement is valid from you.lol, just pulling your chain but you did say several times you don't like games that tell you to figure it out and you use games such as SM64 and OOT to back it up. They were challenging but nothing like what you say they were. And you enjoy the current games better which are easier and feel like they play themselves anyway.
I agree that that's a stupid reason.My friend didn't like the game because you couldn't grab ledges. I think its a bad reason to not like the game but w/e
Typo on my behalf. I wrote that in a rush, I meant to say, "games that use the same engine can have a different feel."I thought you said that you think games with the same engine can feel different?
Did I? Because previously I was trying to get across that the game play isn't what aged well.Now you changed your idea. Before you said that the game's concept didn't age well.
The OP said what we're talking about in here.What constitutes retro games? Just curious.
I think at this point, retro gaming would be anything from the Dreamcast and back IMO.What constitutes retro games? Just curious.
Also I am currently switching between MM and Megaman the original one and I have to say as to Megaman 1 I am enjoying my self to a degree (I like a good challenge) but the controls and my options and how limited they are is something I am not really used to so I am having troubles adjusting. Yes, I am using an emulator, but I am refusing to use save state because I wish a "real" or near "real" gaming experience. Also keyboards suck(Why I say near real).
This statement is so funnyI think at this point, retro gaming would be anything from the Dreamcast and back IMO.
Don't forget, the NES Megaman's are all very hard games. I think Megaman controls awesomely (but why can't he duck!? WHY CAN'T HE EVER DUCK!?)
Fair enough. DK64 was just average for me though some ppl loved itWhat can I say? To me Banjo Kazooie was just average.
I'm not sure about the 3D spherical ones, but the side scrolling ones are def a piece of cake. I've dabbled in 2D game programming so I know.To come up with that and program it? It's no easy task.
Ahh this explains so much. I bet I would have enjoyed Galaxy much more if I didn't care about 100% completion but because I need to beat it 100% to be satisfied, that is why I enjoy the retro games much more. The current games feel more like tedious chores to get 100% then the retro games to me.I never got 100% on any Mario games but given the amount of optional levels that's what I felt.
Its a valid statement from me. Due to the fact that I never grew up on anything but Nintendo systems, I can't speak for systems other than Nintendo and that is where all my critiques and blame go too. I know I haven't been clear at which games/systems/companies I direct my blanket statements at.In retrospect I do have to say that M64 and OoT didn't quite reach those levels, I was mostly thinking of 8-bit and 16-bit games. And I don't think that modern games play themselves at all. But given that from what you've said it sounds like you've had minimal experience with modern games so I'm not even sure if that statement is valid from you.
I guess I will never understand why you think so. Perhaps we are coddled too much by games today to have the patience for retro games. I never played Megan Man back in the day so picking it up now doesn't have the same charm and I'm a bit more impatient because that game is so fcking hard.Did I? Because previously I was trying to get across that the game play isn't what aged well.
That is what games should be about. Its amazing!Every NES game is like that. That's the fun of the games though, memorizing exactly what to do until you can just run through the level blasting **** and looking awesome.
I think that this conversation is probably going to reach a standstill soon and it's kind of eating up any other chances for other topics in this thread so I'll just say I more or less agree with the above statement.Despite that, I think there is nothing wrong with the classic retro games we are just accustomed to today's new standard for game design.
That explains quite a bit. I will gladly tell you modern games rarely have much in the way side quests and the like.Yea, sounds good. I finally understand where you come from not being a completionist, hopefully you understand my frustration with these current games being a completionist.
edit:I got my gamecube set up to play NES, SNES, and N64 games. I can set it up for other systems if need be. Although I have played a few retro games (Alttp, megaman, a majority of the megaman x series if that counts) I feel like diving head first into retro gaming and possibly becoming a retro gamer if the experience of a good challenge is as rewarding as the ones I have played so far. Question is, what are the top ten retro games you think I must play to get the authentic retro game experience?
Aright, I will start off with ninja gaiden. (Not on your top ten but the fact you said it is a good challenge calls my focus to it.)You could go chronologically and do NES, then SNES, and so on!
What system is it for?I was surprised at how decent Moonwalker is. it's actually pretty fun, if a bit weird and silly and sometimes creepy.
Sega Genesis. There's a copy at a local used game story but it's around $60.
What system is it for?
Moonwalker is an amazing game. Played it in the arcades. Marble madness is also a neat little game. I think it was made by Rare actually? o_O
you should like this video
What system is it for?
Awesome music and graphics! I remember playing this back as a kid. I never got past the Last Zombie Stage though, I can remember it up to this day. Those freakin' zombies jumping like bunnies piss me off.I was surprised at how decent Moonwalker is. it's actually pretty fun, if a bit weird and silly and sometimes creepy.
Oh, god it is funny because it is so true.
the candle is by the very beginning of the game where you always start.Would it be shameful if I where to use a guide for Zelda 2? I do not mean look at a guide when I am stuck, I mean use a walkthough to walk me though it. I keep exploring the areas and I need to find the candle because I keep getting murdered at the dark caves.