Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I've explained my thoughts on it many times, but some people just assume I guess.
Yeah, I think it'd actually be a pretty great idea, and it'd help people experience everything Smash Bros has to offer (And print more money!!!
)
I mean...
...
Weather it be Ridley or Savvy Stylist, I would most certainly do my best to main them, but as with all Smash Bros,sometimes you can't gaurentee you'll be good with someone, Like i really like Shulk but I am poor with him and Zelda isn't someone I liked till Hyrule Warriors and I ended up actually pretty good with her
Those aren't thoughts, they're FACTS!
Other than special moves I don't think Wolf got any moves copied over from Fox. Believe it or not he got the Sonic treatment, where his moves were copied over from a large variety of characters.
He's not a semi-clone. Not even close to lucas. He has completely different physics, no standard moves in common, his playstyle is pretty different, and his specials differ in function.I mean...
still a quasi-clone, the same as
From a series whose fanbase is VERY HEAVILY weighted in one nation, like
Who was cut from Brawl to smash 4, like
Hmm... wonder if there's a trend here.
Wolf was a quasi-clone in Brawl bro.
His specials are only similar in name.
No.
.
Yeah, the devs just said they kinda derived him from Fox. Other than that you can see he did get the sonic treatment, like in his usmash, nair and dair.
Clone or not he's easy to bring back, and his attacks are more stronger and savage and safistic in nature. As compared to Fox and Falvo's speed and elegance so clone or not he should come back bro.Wolf was a quasi-clone in Brawl bro.
Do you agree with my idea of him being a prize for buying all the DLC?
They may do that but make sure that he's sold separately.Do you agree with my idea of him being a prize for buying all the DLC?
4 Free, Remember?You know what standard moves Lucas shares with Ness?
They'd probably make him sold seperate later on. A few weeks maybe?They may do that but make sure that he's sold separately.
The Hokey-Pokey?
Well, Sonic actually got the same treatment in brawl. You know, dtilt, utilt, dair, etc. It really doesn't have a name, it's just borrowing moves from other characters.
Similar to Falco, who has similar specials but with different properties. Except the difference between Wolf and Falco, who is considered by many as a semi-clone, is Falco's regular moves are heavily derived from Fox with the exception of Fair and Nair.
I think it's a good idea. But I'd rather him come ragas less. If he's a reward he should've free. Sadly I might not even get the EShop card and if I can't get K. Rool or Cloud at least I could be happy their in. And get some free DLC. But yeah he could be a reward. Also I wasn't mocking you with the bro thing. Sorry if it sounded like that.Do you agree with my idea of him being a prize for buying all the DLC?
I was just about to pull that paragraph here and show everybody.... I guess they can look it up.
Sakurai stated there couldn't be "That many characters" in the base game, as well. Literally, the same statement.
I use icon in regard to being visually recognizable to a mass amount (something, say, Snake is not, even by the standards of his changing design and very average design), but also as something regarding being symbolic of a greater purpose (Something Snake is, in regard to his series and his genre).
No, I didn't feel you felt like that at all. (Partly because I just noticed it)
Well I wasn't so no worries.Would love if Snake returned.
before Melee was them starring in an obscure NES game. There was absolutely nothing "iconic" about or before they were chosen for their respective games. And what's "iconic" about and other than them starring in one of the many sequels of a several years long franchise? What's "iconic" about ? What's "iconic" about ?
I think we're pretty much done for 3rd parties, 5 is a good amount and other than maybe metal gear, tomb raider, maybe rayman and maybe bomberman I can't really see any big series and Lara is nothing without her pistols, Bomberman is dying a slow death and Snake has that E10 rating going against him
How is that an valid reason?
I agree with this. I think Bandana Dee could come with A Kirby Rainbow Curse stage. And Isaac Venus lighthouse.
First party characters don't really have the same high standards applied to them as third party characters. Also, that CommanderVideo trophy wasn't put into the game for being iconic.I don't think being "iconic" has anything to do with anything. I mean, the only thing "iconic" about
Not that I'm saying "non-iconic" third parties have a good chance, but I just don't think the "iconic" thing holds much water.
Also, what's so "iconic" about CommanderVideo that he gets a trophy, other than having games starring him released on many platforms?
...okay, I'm done now.
In regards to third-parties? Yes, "iconic" does matter. You can't compare all third-party characters we have to all first-party characters and say "oh, some first-party characters aren't that iconic, that means we can get non-iconic third-parties!"I don't think being "iconic" has anything to do with anything. I mean, the only thing "iconic" about
Not that I'm saying "non-iconic" third parties have a good chance, but I just don't think the "iconic" thing holds much water.
Also, what's so "iconic" about CommanderVideo that he gets a trophy, other than having games starring him released on many platforms?
...okay, I'm done now.
I'm iffy on getting 6 but I do think its possible. However, I think we'd get Inklings rather than Krystal. Otherwise its a good lineup; barring Krystal (replace her with Inklings) I can easily see this happen if we get 6 characters.
