D
Deleted member
Guest
If Steve were to be announced over Banjo:All we can do now is wait for Steve or Banjo to appear.
Yep... no other way to take a trolling that good.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
If Steve were to be announced over Banjo:All we can do now is wait for Steve or Banjo to appear.
The guy doesn't even tweet about first party stuff.You never know with Nintendo, buddy
True, but he's someone who works at Nintendo.The guy doesn't even tweet about first party stuff.
But what if, here's what if...I'd like to think ballot votes would make the difference here, and considering Banjo probably has a lot more than Steve I'd expect that would matter to Sakurai. Plus, "People wanting Banjo in Smash" was basically an Internet phenomenon for a week or so.
If any Microsoft character is coming (still highly debatable.), I believe you'll make the right choice, Phil!
Idk, with how big the roster is, I only play characters I think are intetesting. There's a,lot of characters on there I still haven't bother to even touch. If it was smaller, then ok.I don't care who gets in anymore!
No matter who it is, Sakurai can make any character fun and give it so much love that we think that he give more of it than its actual owners.
The only things that matter to be is getting a Bowser stage and Pac-Maze for Wii U.
The way I see it, chances never mattered.I don't think "chances" matter anymore.
It's certainly possible; though I'm hesitant to say that all those kids cared to vote on the ballot in the first place. My cousins who fit that exact description all forgot to vote, or weren't interested enough.But what if, here's what if...
Ok...
.... a bunch of millenial children who play nothing but Mincraft and watch Kets Plays, stuffed the ballot with votes for "Minecraft guy."
None of us even knew, thinking they'd vote for Naruto or Adventure time.
Yep....
How would you feel then?
Putting the Inklings in as DLC is a complete and utter waste since you'd be unable to make use of the ink and squid mechanics due to 3DS hardware limitations.If there's any recent character I'd like to see in Smash, it'd be the Inklings.
They're fresh, their game is fun and popular and, most importantly, they finally gave us a shooter game that didn't feel repetitive: Splatoon.
I honestly think they deserve a spot. If it ain't as Smash 4 DLC, it's gonna be in Smash 5.
How do you know this? Did you try to impliment it yourself?Putting the Inklings in as DLC is a complete and utter waste since you'd be unable to make use of the ink and squid mechanics due to 3DS hardware limitations.
Considering that painting the stage would make them a very unique stealth-based character, and being able to go from "kid" to "squid" is literally tge biggest feature in the games, it'd be an utter travesty to force them in as DLC only to make them generic shooting characters and thereby ruining them for future instalments as well.
Adding the Inklings would require a lot of changes to the current Smash engine as well.
No, I just know enough about coding and programming with how Splatoon works to know what would need to be done to implement their mechanics, and what would be too taxing on memory limitations. If you though Ice Climbers were bad...How do you know this? Did you try to impliment it yourself?
ARE YOU SAKURAI?!
I think this little thing could work -> http://smashboards.com/threads/inkl...quid-and-migrate.357786/page-92#post-20296515No, I just know enough about coding and programming with how Splatoon works to know what would need to be done to implement their mechanics, and what would be too taxing on memory limitations. If you though Ice Climbers were bad...
Quit being a smartass and read a little. Or are you gonna tell me that only an Astrophysist can know about string theory? You have a library of information at your fingertips. Use it.
Well, he's clearly been interested in adding Banjo since Melee. Look atMinecraft on Wii U...
That means Microsoft is willing to share IPs with Nintendo, right?
So, what are the odds of Sakurai showing up and asking them if he can add banjo in Smash?
Steve will never be as shocking as Cloud was, because Cloud being in opened people's minds to the possibilities of third-party gaming icons with little to no history with Nintendo. With the confirmation of Minecraft for Wii U today, expect plenty of people to think about the idea of Steve being in Smash.I think Smash fans want Banjo more then Steve.. but let's not forgot how HUUUUUUGE Minecraft is.
If you want a characters tons of not-Smash fans care about, that's the one!
I mean, if Steve gets in as the last new not-ballot character, that'd be a big one. I'd also confuse the HECK out of most Smash fans. :D
How many times am I gonna have to bring up the first 6 Final Fantasy titles AND that FF7 was being developed for the SNES, then N64 before being PlayStation.Steve will never be as shocking as Cloud was, because Cloud being in opened people's minds to the possibilities of third-party gaming icons with little to no history with Nintendo.
"I decided to only add 3rd party characters as DLC, because, you know, it's not like this is a Nintendo fighting game."I'll be hella disappointed if we get no Nintendo newcomers at this point in favor of third parties.
That's my point. Cloud, whilst being a gaming icon was a character who had little history with Nintendo, only having relatively minor appearances on a Nintendo system in comparison to being more associated with Playstation due to the importance and popularity of FF7 on the PS1. Those were the reasons why most people thought Cloud was unlikely. Along with his confirmation, the revelation that Sakurai stated it was only a courtesy for a character to have experience on a Nintendo system made people consider other gaming icons they wouldn't have.How many times am I gonna have to bring up the first 6 Final Fantasy titles AND that FF7 was being developed for the SNES, then N64 before being PlayStation.
Cloud has some history with Nintendo. Only difference is that you have to dig pretty deeply to find some for Cloud.
I don't believe for a moment we are getting third-party characters from now on, seeing as Sakurai explicitly stated he wasn't going to include that many third-party characters because this was still a Nintendo-oriented crossover. Besides, do you really think, after Nintendo stated that their strength is their IP, that they would not have any Nintendo newcomers as DLC? That would literally send off the message that none of their remaining Nintendo characters are good enough to be DLC for their big-name crossover, not something you want if you're trying to ensure that your IPs are your main assets.I'll be hella disappointed if we get no Nintendo newcomers at this point in favor of third parties.
Did you read the posts on the next page that followed tge one you posted.Minecraft on Wii U...
That means Microsoft is willing to share IPs with Nintendo, right?
So, what are the odds of Sakurai showing up and asking them if he can add banjo in Smash?
I think this little thing could work -> http://smashboards.com/threads/inkl...quid-and-migrate.357786/page-92#post-20296515
That's true, but as you said, he's an ICON!That's my point. Cloud, whilst being a gaming icon was a character who had little history with Nintendo, only having relatively minor appearances on a Nintendo system in comparison to being more associated with Playstation due to the importance and popularity of FF7 on the PS1. Those were the reasons why most people thought Cloud was unlikely. Along with his confirmation, the revelation that Sakurai stated it was only a courtesy for a character to have experience on a Nintendo system made people consider other gaming icons they wouldn't have.
Honestly, I would rather have them now.Would you rather have them now, and not be as good as they could be, or be patient and wait for the next game and have them be amazing?
If it's possible, I want them ASAP, but I think I can wait...Would you rather have them now, and not be as good as they could be, or be patient and wait for the next game and have them be amazing?
He says little about the quantity, and is very vague about how many, he simply states that it's difficult, and he simply won't add anyone willy-nilly. He says that they have to be very "special cases." Which to me, sounds like gaming icons only.I don't believe for a moment we are getting third-party characters from now on, seeing as Sakurai explicitly stated he wasn't going to include that many third-party characters because this was still a Nintendo-oriented crossover. Besides, do you really think, after Nintendo stated that their strength is their IP, that they would not have any Nintendo newcomers as DLC? That would literally send off the message that none of their remaining Nintendo characters are good enough to be DLC for their big-name crossover, not something you want if you're trying to ensure that your IPs are your main assets.
This broadcast needs to be over soon, it's getting riduculos when Master Chief is a regularly considered newcomer in the minds of folks. Master Chief will never become a fighter in Smash, and neither will any of Sony's first party characters. They are in direct competition with Nintendo in the hardware space. Let's start being reasonable and use common sense without getting carried away with speculationYou know, everyone’s going on about either Steve or Banjo, but if Sakurai did want to bring in a Microsoft owned character, am I the only one who thinks he’d might go with this guy?
Now one thing that BK and Minecraft have over Halo is they had (or will) have appearences on Nintendo consoles, but as stated before Sakurai considers that to be more of a courtesy kind of thing rather than requirement. And hey, there was Halo DS in development at some point lol.
Sakurai stated in the past that he wanted to make Smash the best character game in the world, and naturally he’s living up to that promise by including such famous characters like Ryu and Cloud. Let’s face it, terms of popularity, fame and impact, Master Chief (basically Mr. FPS) and Halo basically blow Banjo Kazooie out of the water. Halo revolutionized the modern FPS as know it and became a cornerstone in multiplayer games. I honestly feel like the notion of the Chief appearing alongside Mario, Cloud, Link, Sonic and such in the same game together would cause more hype than Banjo, really. It’s like a GameFAQs character battle come to life.
But of course, all of this depends on if Sakurai can get or even want a Microsoft owned character in Smash.
I was just saying if. I'm not holding my breath for Chief for the reasons you mentioned. I just brought him up because I saw some discussion on Banjo and Steve, those other Microsoft owned guys.This broadcast needs to be over soon, it's getting riduculos when Master Chief is a regularly considered newcomer in the minds of folks. Master Chief will never become a fighter in Smash, and neither will any of Sony's first party characters. They are in direct competition with Nintendo in the hardware space. Let's start being reasonable and use common sense without getting carried away with speculation
Honestly, I would rather have them now.
Even at the expense of how the characters are implemented?If it's possible, I want them ASAP, but I think I can wait...
I don't think he'd have an issue with getting a MS character in Smash all things considered. It just have to be a "special case."You know, everyone’s going on about either Steve or Banjo, but if Sakurai did want to bring in a Microsoft owned character, am I the only one who thinks he’d might go with this guy?
Now one thing that BK and Minecraft have over Halo is they had (or will) have appearences on Nintendo consoles, but as stated before Sakurai considers that to be more of a courtesy kind of thing rather than requirement. And hey, there was Halo DS in development at some point lol.
Sakurai stated in the past that he wanted to make Smash the best character game in the world, and naturally he’s living up to that promise by including such famous characters like Ryu and Cloud. Let’s face it, terms of popularity, fame and impact, Master Chief (basically Mr. FPS) and Halo basically blow Banjo Kazooie out of the water. Halo revolutionized the modern FPS as know it and became a cornerstone in multiplayer games. I honestly feel like the notion of the Chief appearing alongside Mario, Cloud, Link, Sonic and such in the same game together would cause more hype than Banjo, really. It’s like a GameFAQs character battle come to life.
But of course, all of this depends on if Sakurai can get or even want a Microsoft owned character in Smash.
Literally read the first sentence of that post.This broadcast needs to be over soon, it's getting riduculos when Master Chief is a regularly considered newcomer in the minds of folks. Master Chief will never become a fighter in Smash, and neither will any of Sony's first party characters. They are in direct competition with Nintendo in the hardware space. Let's start being reasonable and use common sense without getting carried away with speculation
The way I see it, the two options are either take an Inkling with different mechanics or wait about 5+ years for Inklings to be fully optimized. If Sakurai brings Inklings in I trust he can work his way around it in a creative way. And if he can't then I'm sure he won't bother putting him in the game, which I can accept.Even at the expense of how the characters are implemented?
Why?
Except Chief's primary weapon is the Assault Rifle and realistic guns isn't an issue because of Halo 5's loadout REQs.Even at the expense of how the characters are implemented?
Why?
I don't think he'd have an issue with getting a MS character in Smash all things considered. It just have to be a "special case."
On Chief, two words:
Realistic.Guns.
And no, you can't "change him" taking the BR from Chief is like taking the Ink from the Inklings.
Also, deja vu.