"Firstly you're mistaking the word 'target'. I never said 'incriminate' although I do believe you were trying to lead up to that. Target as in you honed in on it as a topic.
If you mean target as in honed in on it as a topic, then you're undermining your own argument. Go back and see how much time I've spent commenting on your playstyle.
I noted it once in a general post.
I've called you out directly on it.
Strawmanning.
Now as to why I feel you you were trying to lead up to incriminating me was, for one, the fact that you called me out on being "antagonizing" as if you were trying to imply that my posting style had something to do with my alignment. Second of all, it was such an immediate call-out. Like I have been saying, you weren't putting any thought into it, you just targeted it to target it. [/COLOR]
As for the first point, I've answered this before. I wasn't calling your posting style antagonistic, your reply was. Here is what I said:
The antagonizing thing is denying a request by a fellow player. If it disturbs that player without you intending it to, then it's not a problem. Said player requests you to stop, yet you continue, simply because you can not discern the motive.
Twisting information.
As for the second point, it was an immediate call out because I've had my eyes on you since your first post. Keep reading, Zen baby boy.
Ok, I can take that I'm misinterpreting this here. What do you mean by my though flow being annoying?
Keep reading.
This is such BS. As I have said he was clearly looking at both of them during that time. He had just made a response to adum and had shown that he was trying to get him to talk. For you to ask this so early in the game in order "to understand why he was hurpdurp voting him" is bs and you know it. Furthermore, your quote that you quoted below this once again shows contradiction your statement about not wanting him to switch to Acro. There was no initial and secondary thought. It's all the same thing. It's so clear that you simply slipped up haha.
Once again you're completely missing the mark.
What I said was that his vote was better spent on Acrostic at that moment. A vote on Adumb does not make him talk more, while a vote on Acrostic builds pressure, which he was supporting. In his own replies it is visible that he found Acrotic more suspicious.
There really was no reason to not pressure Acrostic.
And yeah, the initial and secondary thoughts are straight out of my notes. It's your perception that I slipped up, and you're sticking to it even when I've laid out where I'm coming from. Where is the flaw?
Haha no you don't get to do this. What you were trying to determine if I was faking a restriction? What you have some hunger gambit that has to do with restrictions? Out with it bro n_n."
Heh.
The subsequent interaction with zen I don't like, not enough to negate my read, but it seems frivolous and he gets more flustered about it then he should.
That was excitement.
See, before I go into more, this is a point that will probably interest you, Adumb.
"@X1: I dig you, but man Xonar is more of a threat. I'd rather go him first."
Note how he says I'm more of a threat, instead of focusing on scumminess which a town would do.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Alright, I'm gonna do this from the beginning. CASE!
Let's start out with his initial post.
"Adum has already given off an unintentional town tell. Though I should keep that to myself."
While not a big point, it is what got me to frown at Zen. This is a type of openness not profitable to town.
You out an obvious town read if you don't want people to push that way or need elaboration, what you're doing is saying you have a town read on someone without elaborating. You know what that means? That means that scum knows something more about your slot that they can abuse.
If you would do this as town, it'd be detrimental and it's a subtle, but telling tell.
Then, let's look at the same post.
Now then, how should I go about this? I should be able to read X1 withing his first few posts. Adum has already given off an unintentional town tell. Though I should keep that to myself. Xonar is someone I'm going to need to get an early grasp on. Actually no he isn't. It will just be a waste of time. I'll put him aside until about day three. Or until I have a read on everyone else. It might be good just to policy lynch him as well hmm... Nah I'll go with the first plan. Circus, July Sang, and Acro are who I need to get early reads on. The moderate-active category.[/COLOR][/I]
And with that, Zen began to speak to the town.
[...]
Scum is likely between Acro, Circus, July, and Sang. All the women.
His thought process is not a town thought process. Mainly because of the underlined.
He is referring to SCUM likely being between Acro, Circus, July and Sang. Now, let's look at his PoE.
I should be able to read X1 withing his first few posts.
Adum has already given off an unintentional town tell. Though I should keep that to myself.
Xonar is someone I'm going to need to get an early grasp on. Actually no he isn't. It will just be a waste of time. I'll put him aside until about day three.
His PoE doesn't refer to scumminess. That's logical, because there hasn't been anything to go on. The illogical thing, is once again, in this;
Scum is likely between Acro, Circus, July, and Sang. All the women.[/FONT]
It's inconsistent. Why PoE based on how easy a slot is to read, only to call for the scum in the slots that you want to keep an eye on? That's going in with the mindset of finding scummy things, not scum.
That might not be a strong point, but in context of it being the first post,
it smells.
Now, for this:
"Circus: Is avoiding an RVS vote something that you usually do? Or were you just following the trend? It's ok if it was the latter. Sometimes we unintentionally fall in line with the patterns others have unintentionally established."
He's giving Circus an out? Why? This is so off.
What you're doing is putting pressure, then immediately saying "oh but it's not a big deal". Scummy.
Then, another point;
"You asked me why I told him and stated that we could have gotten information from it. You have yet to give an example of how we could have. So far you have only explained a tell that had already happened (that badwolf would have known swiss wasn't in the game if he were scumbuds with one of them). He had already made that tell by asking if he was in the game. How could you have further gotten information had I not informed him that Swiss wasn't in the game?"
Acro was wrong, but not necessarily scummy. The scummy thing was calling it useless and proposing it. The idea itself is not, just wrong.[/QUOTE]
You're pushing him but for the wrong reason.
Then, there's the fact that you jump off Acro and on to me waaaay too fast, on the premise of the tell I told you. You did it all wrong, I am very sharp this game. From your first post til now I've been feeling you out and looking for potential partners.
Then there's the reason why I asked you about your posting style.
Remember how it initially was just a lose remark? That's because I wanted to test your reaction to it, when it could've simply been because I have found it annoying. I've done this consequentially.
Let's look at my play with some of my notes, shall we?
My first vote, which is explained above. Ramen's initial post rang alarms.
Zen, please drop that writing style. It makes it more annoying to read you.
I decided to do this. As explained above.
Then, you decide to ignore me. I obviously want results.
Zen, I asked you to drop it.
Drop it.
Simple poke. This time, instead of a request, I am more forceful. You had no reason at this point to continue with your posting style if I simply requested you to stop this, you can not deny this.
You then, instead of listening, seeing as I made sure that I am serious, go on with your posting style.
I then hint you that you're being an antagonist, here;
You have no reason to continue at this point, do you?
Now, after this quote, it is not about your posting style anymore. At this point, it's about your reply.
This is, once again, a completely legit point. It's a loaded question. You avoid it and vote me. I reveal my true accusation, hinting that I have a scum read on you.
The question I'm truly asking is; why are you being an antagonist?
And explaining why I think what I do;
The antagonizing thing is denying a request by a fellow player. If it disturbs that player without you intending it to, then it's not a problem. Said player requests you to stop, yet you continue, simply because you can not discern the motive.
That's being an antagonist.
Yes, at this point I feel like I've spent a lot of time feeling you out. You haven't satisfied me up til now whatsoever, even breaking focus on Acrostic. (which I'll get back to later)
Last piece of the puzzle: explain to me how asking you to stop is scummy when I can simply find it annoying when you post like that?
This is simply evidence of my true intention.
Then, I can go ahead and quote all my replies, because honestly, they do nothing but prove your replies to be inadequate and twists/strawmans. To walk past your replies real quick:
"-You target my posting style without even considering how it is troublesome. You have yet to state how it is so. This leads me to believe that you were just targeting something you felt was easy to target. You have not truly looked at my "thought flow". You had not even let me posts enough to know if you could understand my thought process. You just went for it immediately without any sort of analysis. In reality, changing the color of my posts does not affect anything about what I'm saying haha.
Strawman. I did not target your posting style at all, and I've been looking at your overall play. Your reply to my prodding just proved scummy and made me giddy. That's also...
-You're already pretty jumpy. Your question to Circus about why he is voting adum had no real thought behind it just like you asking me to stop my posting style has no real thought behind it. You quickly felt the need to state that it was a real question right after you asked him because you realized your mistake and that fake that there was no thought behind the question.
Reason why you call me jumpy. You assume I have no other information about you. My question to Circus I also have explained. It was objectively better to be on Acrostic, and it also looked more profitable if I were to replace myself in Circus.
"
Then there's here, where you repeat your initial scumtell
"Welp X1 is confirmed town. Not even indy. Definitely should keep that to myself though. "
Except on X1 and not Adumb.
Then there's this juicy wordslip
"@X1: I dig you, but man Xonar is more of a threat. I'd rather go him first."
Oh yes Ramen. You're scummy and you have to go. Why wasn't I on you before? Clearly I wanted town to focus. If we were to pressure Acrostic and he proved scummy, then I had a lot of ammo to shape D2 to my liking after an Acro lynch. If we were to pressure Acrostic and he proved towny, town was more organized and easier to shape to follow these arguments on you.
I also wanted to hear more out of you, obviously.
Acrostic pressure simply had no negative for a lot of players, including me.
So, to sum up the case:
- Your openness is faked, and detrimental if you are town
- Your initial thought process is off
- Your early pressure is not true pressure, as you give your target an out
- Your early pressure also misses the mark, incriminating Acrostic for the wrong reasons
- You break town's focus without proper reason
- The bulk of your replies to me are strawmans and twisting
- You dun slippin'
Vote: Ramen King
That's it.
Circus, remember this?
I'm gonna go ahead and assume the language of this question ("avoiding an RVS vote?" Heh.) is the result of newborn paranoia of me due to EBR Mafia. I'm hoping you squash that soon.
You give him an easy out on it, but looking at it in my light, it does look scummy. Rock the vote.
Why tell him?
We could have used it to see if he would give us some relationship tells on his mafia partners.
Do you still stand by this objection? Getting on Zen would be swell.
Zen, you're the scummy one here.