bearsfan092
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2012
- Messages
- 402
A little stage selection theory guys. Against Marth
So imagine game 1 gets played on Yoshi's (best of 3), and the Marth wins. Marth naturally bans Dreamland. This leaves FoD, FD, Battlefield, Yoshi's, and Stadium on the list. From what I watch, it seems like a lot of Foxes like taking Marth to Battlefield if they recognize Stadium for the Marth nightmare it really is. Happens in a lot of vods I watch too.
My question is why would you take Marth there as opposed to FoD? Battlefield's edge is conducive to edgeguarding, whereas FoD you can ride the wall if you happen to get caught at or below stage level. If you happen to be caught low offstage on Battlefield, you pretty much have to go to the edge or slightly above, making the edgeguard easy for Marth (and really the entire top tier cast). Against Marth, it's not really any harder to edgeguard Marth on FoD as opposed to Battlefield.
In terms of platforms, Marth really doesn't have any problems covering options on Battlefield should you end up above him. On FoD, a low platform doesn't really hurt Fox any more than a Battlefield platform would. The only situation is if you have an edge-camping Marth. In that case an overshot nair to the edge will probably get intercepted by a platform, but you can still grab/running shine any DD-baited approaches. If the platform goes high, then you have a Dreamland-type platform, and Fox loves those against Marth. Things get problematic if FoD loses both platforms and resembles FD, but in general it seems the platforms favor Fox more than Battlefield would.
I guess an aerial-happy Fox would get stifled by FoD, but Marth is definitely one of those matchups where you should be staying grounded as long as possible, so I don't see it as that big of a problem.
In short, wall+platforms seems to make FoD a better counterpick than Battlefield in the Fox-Marth MU. Is there anything wrong in my assumptions or any details I'm missing?
So imagine game 1 gets played on Yoshi's (best of 3), and the Marth wins. Marth naturally bans Dreamland. This leaves FoD, FD, Battlefield, Yoshi's, and Stadium on the list. From what I watch, it seems like a lot of Foxes like taking Marth to Battlefield if they recognize Stadium for the Marth nightmare it really is. Happens in a lot of vods I watch too.
My question is why would you take Marth there as opposed to FoD? Battlefield's edge is conducive to edgeguarding, whereas FoD you can ride the wall if you happen to get caught at or below stage level. If you happen to be caught low offstage on Battlefield, you pretty much have to go to the edge or slightly above, making the edgeguard easy for Marth (and really the entire top tier cast). Against Marth, it's not really any harder to edgeguard Marth on FoD as opposed to Battlefield.
In terms of platforms, Marth really doesn't have any problems covering options on Battlefield should you end up above him. On FoD, a low platform doesn't really hurt Fox any more than a Battlefield platform would. The only situation is if you have an edge-camping Marth. In that case an overshot nair to the edge will probably get intercepted by a platform, but you can still grab/running shine any DD-baited approaches. If the platform goes high, then you have a Dreamland-type platform, and Fox loves those against Marth. Things get problematic if FoD loses both platforms and resembles FD, but in general it seems the platforms favor Fox more than Battlefield would.
I guess an aerial-happy Fox would get stifled by FoD, but Marth is definitely one of those matchups where you should be staying grounded as long as possible, so I don't see it as that big of a problem.
In short, wall+platforms seems to make FoD a better counterpick than Battlefield in the Fox-Marth MU. Is there anything wrong in my assumptions or any details I'm missing?
Last edited: