bobson
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 1,674
Raise your hand if your first thought upon seeing this image was "Metaknight is using his mask to masturbate."
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Raise your hand if your first thought upon seeing this image was "Metaknight is using his mask to masturbate."
lol. Quite an observation you made there, Sherlock, considering Metaknight IS a ball in and of itself... :embarrassMetaknight doesn't have the balls to do so...
lol. Quite an observation you made there, Sherlock, considering Metaknight IS a ball in and of itself... :embarrass
right, no one thinks he's broken, pro ban just think he deserves to be banned because he's...what's a word for too good...uh... ...I loathe the fact that some anti-bans are still saying pro-bans think MK is broken.
right, no one thinks he's broken, pro ban just think he deserves to be banned because he's...what's a word for too good...uh... ...
Tell me the literal definition of a "broken character" and then imagine a character that is better than everyone by measuring each character's traits in a general manner. He's simply the best at everything that makes Brawl unique as a fighting game, or party game for those of you who love to disagree with everything.right, no one thinks he's broken, pro ban just think he deserves to be banned because he's...what's a word for too good...uh... ...
you have a wonderful mindRaise your hand if your first thought upon seeing this image was "Metaknight is using his mask to masturbate."
epic lol im still laughing putting this i love it.
**** i cant get my pic for thisfast edit:....now that i look at my avatar.....oh my god what have i done
This is a very smart man right here.Ive actually begun the process of shifting from sonic/ddd/lucario to MK/ICs already
You can look up Plank vs DaPuffster on YouTube, MK vs Diddy. That is a hilarious video, and the end makes it worth your time, forreal forreal.someone explain aircamping to me, or show me a vid.
with most characters having projectiles its hard for me to believe it's a big deal.
Lemme look for a vid! :Dsomeone explain aircamping to me, or show me a vid.
with most characters having projectiles its hard for me to believe it's a big deal.
It's only over for now. "the fourth and final commuinty vote". I don't think it's actually done sadly. The in-fighting is doing more damage to the community than MK, banned or not.Led whats ridiculous is that people are still making their pro/anti ban arguments when the debate is essentially over.
Ok, but the anti-ban side said "lets wait for genesis and apex" like how many times? It really goes both ways here.The only reason I bring up Genesis is because throughout the debate it bugged me that the pro-ban side attempted to use it as proof, Im not even saying its something the anti-ban side can claim.
I suppose so, but it's still largley interprative (I know I spelled that wrong). We have seen these players lose to other players of similar skill level more times than genesis, so IMO, assuming them best is a little off. But W/E.Anyways, I'm not trying to claim one region to be better then another, just specific players. It just so happens that each is from a separate region. Yes its possible to disagree, but even if we narrow it to just those who attended Genesis I dont think many would disagree that of those players M2K and Ally were the first or second best players there, Tyrant a solid third and Dojo a questionable 4th. They just so happened to place almost exactly as expected. Which is my my main point, Im not trying to say DEHF couldnt beat Dojo or Tyrant couldnt beat MK. Im saying that the results for Genesis were very predictable if you were to just look at the names.
The 66% is standard procedure for most things SBR, as far as they say, and it's that way with most things in regular voting when its changing something automatically in effect (a characted doesn't start banned.)Can I ask where the 66% number for metaknight to be banned came from?
Was this just someone talking and theorizing, because I thought this was more about adding a public vote to the SBR vote, which if I heard correctly, pro-ban needed 57 point something to tip the scale in pro bans favor.
lol people like to argue its pointless like this poll has become though some people are trolling.LOL @ people still arguing.
yo why the hell are you still arguing?
The thing with the "It's only been a year" argument is that he's just too far ahead of other characters. I'm positive that no matter how others develop, what new ATs or mindgames they discover or create, MK will still be abusing each character's weaknesses the same way he still is, and the things he does now will still be done afterwards.wow ban meta knight... that wouldn't that make who ever mained him in a way either quit smash or move on to the next thing lol.. (Snake). seriously i understand MK is good, but its only been a year, other characters still have to grow don't they? In order for things to pick up. Besides Wasn't MK Overused by a lot of ppl? so naturally he would be the best Char in the game. im saying if you ban him make it Temporary... don't care how temporary, just temporary. So the Other Characters Can grow, I mean didn't Wario for instance move from #8 to 3? and has somewhat of an even Meta Game with MK? Just an example of character progress is all. Basically My Arguement is I dissaprove A PermaBan (or any ban), but wouldn't mind a TempBan.
Why are you even looking for arguments? Look at what starts the arguments, someone in this page asked what our main arguments were (pro-ban), so I gave them a rebuttal. I'm not arguing.It's like this thread is on 'repeat' mode or something. The same arguments get rehashed page after page...
these threads haven't been productive in a long time, most actual discussion took place by almost a year ago, now most people on both sides basically just repeat a few talking points over and over againIt's like this thread is on 'repeat' mode or something. The same arguments get rehashed page after page...
MK doesn't need balls. All he needs is a sword so he can cut your throat open at mach speed.Metaknight doesn't have the balls to do so...
Well hey, if limiting some things can keep a whole freaking character from being banned then why not?I think if mk is to be kept, more things would have to be limited or something.
Pretty much. That's why I stopped worrying about this issue a long time ago.You do realize that antiban already won? Even with a 60/40 split in favor of the ban in the sbr, it comes out to like 63% With the community vote.
Give it up. Anti ban already won.Ban. Pro-Ban had criterion that we judge everything in Brawl as banworthy and MK meets the requirements. 1+1=2, it's not a matter of opinion; it's logic. I think a nice half a year long ban should be looked @ to see how different metagames grow and how tournaments play out to see if he should be permanently banned or not. It's a compromise that benefits the community as a whole instead of dependent MK players. If you are a good Smasher, you'll be good with or without MK, no?
So stop being b****es and vote ban.
Mango was posting in this one, too. He said he would pick up Brawl if Meta Knight wasn't banned as far as I remember.really diem and mango owning the last topic was the only good thing to come from this discussion in a long time
If you are a good Smasher, you can win against Meta Knight, no?If you are a good Smasher, you'll be good with or without MK, no?
For pro-ban to be 66.67% and anti-ban to be 33.33%, them having 1,417 votes, we need 2060 votes, which is 388 random votes appearing out of nowhere (considering the pro-ban's votes are 1,672 to begin with)...Ban. Pro-Ban had criterion that we judge everything in Brawl as banworthy and MK meets the requirements. 1+1=2, it's not a matter of opinion; it's logic. I think a nice half a year long ban should be looked @ to see how different metagames grow and how tournaments play out to see if he should be permanently banned or not. It's a compromise that benefits the community as a whole instead of dependent MK players. If you are a good Smasher, you'll be good with or without MK, no?
So stop being b****es and vote ban.
Touche~! Only if I focus all my practice hours training how to beat him without having a secondary MK or Snake. Kirby no bueno against MK.If you are a good Smasher, you can win against Meta Knight, no?
Kirby is OK vs MK... He's better than ZSS IMO, since MK just can't get combo'd, and ZSS is a combo character.Touche~! Only if I focus all my practice hours training how to beat him without having a secondary MK or Snake. Kirby no bueno against MK.
We don't even count for that. At absolute best, (this is saying everyone voted ban, 100%) we count for 26 votes, aka, 1/4 of the SBR-B. We get one SBR vote for 50%, then an extra vote for every 2.5% after 50. So we get 2 now, maybe 3 if we get a uge influx of proban. It's not happening.For pro-ban to be 66.67% and anti-ban to be 33.33%, them having 1,417 votes, we need 2060 votes. You're asking the impossible, my friend.