I don't like this, I mean not the conclusion per se, but the fact that you posted this conclusion instead of keeping it for yourself. Probably after hydra'ing with Edreeses he told you at some point that trying to befriend me is better than accusing me of scum or something like that. It's obvious you wouldn't convince anyone else I'm town with this, which reinforces my argument. I'm keeping my vote by now
Also, I found this breadcrumb:
It's also very likely adumbrodeus is ff's buddy too. Don't believe what they say and lynch them.
Wow
1. Rajam, saying that somebody is a town read isn't buddying, and if I wanted to befriend you, tossing you into the "idiot town" category isn't the way to do it.
2. Why would I keep it to myself? Keeping townreads to yourself deprives town of valuable information because tracking positions is how people figure out whose town or scum.
3. Why would you say that Edrees me that? What makes you think that A. you're considered enough of a power player to be worth buddying, B. that I wouldn't be able to figure that out myself if you were, C. that Edrees specifically would tell me that?
Also, your breadcrumbs are BS:
I don't like this, I mean not the conclusion per se, but the fact that you posted this conclusion instead of keeping it for yourself. Probably after hydra'ing with Edreeses he told you at some point that trying to befriend me is better than accusing me of scum or something like that. It's obvious you wouldn't convince anyone else I'm town with this, which reinforces my argument. I'm keeping my vote by now
Also, I found this breadcrumb:
See, by picking arbitrary letters in posts I can spell out pretty much whatever I want. There was no reason for FF to as scum BC that he's scum anyway, why would he, he's a better player then that.
But on the plus side you are making me question my read on you, are you seriously this bad or is this just BS? On the other hand, if you aren't scum, why would you attack a player you know is strong for a town read on you? Also I find it odd that your scumbuddy in DN said pretty much exactly the same thing when making a BS case on me (that I'm scum and you shouldn't believe what I say).
I agree with Rajam. Adum is too scummy. I don't think it s inrentional, I think he's just bad at scum.
Unvote; Vote: Adum
Good job making yourself more obvious Zen.
You jump on Rajam's case without making a case of your own, failing to notice of course, that Rajam's case is complete BS.
Your only other contribution has been a fake contribution case on somebody DURING RVS and pushing for his quicklynch. Which wouldn't have been so bad if it wasn't gord who is bad and therefore reletively easy to mislynch.
Out of all the things you could have gone after adum for... this really just isn't one of them. As a matter of fact, I agreed with his conclusion at the time, and saw no real problem with him posting it.
I facepalmed at this "breadcrumb". Someone please tell me I wasn't the only one.
@Zen
The problem with your argument is that adum is not bad as scum. I saw him firsthand in LOTR mafia, and he blended in brilliantly. No, I think his bad play IS intentional, which means he's probably trying to avoid the NK. If anything, I'm guessing he's indy.
Anyway, what do you think of a Gord/X1/Rajam scumteam?
Nick, how is my play bad?
Review my case against Zen and answer me that.
Unless going against the town consensus is automatically "bad play", but then again let me ask you this, has anyone whose ever played me as town known me to sheep with the town consensus?
Adums play is just so bad to me. I've played with him a few times now and everytime I've pretty much disagreed with his reads and the way he plays in general. He's always scummy to me. But apparantly he plays certain ways intentionally and with reason and is looks at things steps ahead. Like intentionally being scummy so scum would think he had a pr when he was vanilla so he would be nked.
It's difficult to determine if he has motives for the way he has been playing this game or if he is just bad scum and is unintentionally being so scummy. I was just keeping my eye on him, but Rajam made a good point and when I went to review I noticed Adum had done similar things throughout.
He's being so open like he isn't really trying to uncover scum and is just saying things to act like he's doing ****. When you're being so blatant with what you're purpose is or what you want people to do it pretty much defeats the purpose because they simply tailor the way they play. So it's strange to me that he is being so blatant and doesn't look like he is really scumhunting.
#63: "I wanna reaction fish gord more before I weigh in on this myself."
#69: "Did you read my post? I neither agreed nor disagreed with you and I have no intention of giving that opinion until I have useful reactions and giving my opinion on it at this point will spoil his reactions."
#161: "Still waiting on X1's reaction."
Not to mention his reads and targets are just aweful. Why would he want to lynch the person who has brought out the majority of the conversation in the day and is so obviously town. I don't even think it's possible for scum to play the way I'm playing and Adum is rudiculous to think I'm scum. For scum to push a mislynch that hard is like autotarget the next day. He even said that generally wagons leaders are town, but says this is different because gboy was an easy target. How is gboy an easy target? People are acting like gboy is an idiot. He knows how to play.
You're missing a very simple point, when people are asking questions it's obvious they're fishing for reactions, telling people doesn't change that at all.
What made the difference was my impressions of the situation which I refused to give until I had the information I needed to make a decision on that, but you sir were on the scumlist from the beginning.
Gboy is an easy target, he may know HOW to play but the simple fact is that he's bad at the game, and mislynching him can easily be excused by "gboy was playing in such a scummy way".
If you don't think so, then let me ask you this, why do you think there can be merit to a fake contribution case in RVS?
You say that Rajam made a good point, care to explain what that good point was and why it suggests I'm scum? Also care to explain how I've behaved the same throughout when I have to this point given 2 town reads, only one of which (rajam) was behavioral, the other was wagon analysis?
Zen, you're tossing s*** to the wall in an attempt to see what sticks, this suggests you're attempting to discredit me because you can't discredit my case.