1) Yet again with the Skull Kid is outdated Midna is more recent argument. Seriously I have had to fight every Midna argument at least twice on this thread so far. Anyway Skull Kid is a classic character that is still appearing while Midna is just a passing fad that probably won't come back. She is in the same position SK was in for melee and he didn't get in so why should Midna? Don't give me that Shiek crap because I have beaten it like 5 times already.
2) Midna's game was longer and she was the companion character of course she has had more screen time, so what. You barely saw adult Zelda in OoT but she still got in. Screen time means nothing as long as their role was important.
3) Just because someone doesn't fight in the games doesn't mean they can't fight at all.
4) Once again screen time means nothing. Skull Kid is the same one every time and it has already been proven on this thread so I won't waste time on it again. No matter what you say it won't change the fact that SK is more important to the series as a whole than Midna and I have already said why countless times.
5) I know that I was just pointing out that they are just as helpful in a fight to Link than Midna is.
6) I never said SK was relevant to the plot of TP.
7) As long as the character matters to the plot screen time is unimportant.
8) It's been proven several times that it is the same one.
9) Now your just ignoring the truth.
10) His support role was in TP not OoT.
11) Nintendo loves to show that the old days haven't been forgotten and by adding SK they could show that they still remember the old 64 days which will forever be Nintendo's greatest era.
12) Skull kid has One major role(MM), one supporting role(TP) and one minor role(OoT) while Midna only has one major role(TP) which makes SK more important than her.
13) First off you burn yourself by saying SK didn't make it into melee because if he didn't and he was in the same situation as Midna(recent major character) than what makes you think she has a chance? MM is one of if not the most popular Zelda titles out there.
14) Yeah Tingle has sort of mixed chances.
15) Even so there are still many character more unique than her.
15) Once again recent and screen time mean nothing and if Link's Uncle has been considered and put on that stupid poll I think they would have thought about SK too don't you think?
16) Stupid Nintendo not supplying enough Wiis.
17) I actually know enough about Midna and her role in TP to form an opinion on her so just drop this.
18) Yes, very easily.
1) and Yet u say the same thing can happen to midna:
In melee they had less time than they had fro brawl, thus with the deadline near they couldnt finish the game lik they whould have wanted, and they added characters that were pretyt much fillers, this AINT the case in brawl cause they have much more time than they had for melee, thus the chances that happens to midna are very slim...
2) Exactly, roles are important, and midnas role was the most impotatn in the game
3) True, but does that do fight take less time in thinking of a moveset, while character like for example fox and falcon had to have movesets from scratch, which take more time...
4) It has never been proven that the skull kid is the same one in every game, which is unlikely, theres a chance the OoT and MM skull kid are the same, with what skull kid says at the end of MM, but highly unlikely that the TP is the same one, having a drastically diferent look, a tad smaller in size I believe, and the fact that TP takes hundreds (not exactly 100 years, miyamoto said hundreds) of years after OoT...
I highly doubt how one sime-big role, one appearance wheres hes playing a flute and a cameo consider a character a character important to the entire series... and no matter what u say it wont change the fact that midna has more of a chance for being more recent, stars in the newest game, and has a big fanbase... dont believe me? look at the rate their chances thread, midna is on the top ten....
5) in a fight the kign was useless actually, and navy and tatl just target the oponents, midna actually fight, by creating the shadow fields and all, hell she even took on god form gnaondorf...
6) ok
7) Yep, midna is important to the plot, but also has screen time, its win-win!
8) No it hasnt, So far I have nto seen PROOF that its the same one, the closest thing ive seen is:
"Skull kid has the same look as the moon, it has to be the same one!"
something like that...
9) OMG then wolf link is OoT link and MM link! he howls the same songs! give me a break... just because he plays sarias song, doesnt mean its the same one, it could be that in the hundreds of years between the gaps of OoT/MM and TP, SOMEONE could have learned the song from the OoT skull kid, I mean, I can learn a song in a day, I bet they can learn a simple song in hundreds of years...
10) Thus his role in OoT was kinda useless...
11) 64 doesnt need rep, more than haf the characters in melee were from 64, the ones that need rep are NES, SNES and GC, 64 had plenty of rep, and aint retro enough to get rep either...
12) Time and time again, appearances mean nothing, and sheik only had one minor role in OoT, look at that she was in melee, hel lskull kid didnt even had such a big role in MM, u just c him in the begining and at the end, when u face the mask, yeah u dont face him, u face tha mask, he aint really the bad guy, being the puppet and all, even the mask said so... u cant consider his role in OoT, u didnt really need him, hell Malo in TP had more of a role that SK in OoT, at 1st u went to save the little guy and the other kids, and to get the magic armor u needed him to get it...
and well a cameo aint really much help either, if u were to combined SK role sin one, it would barely be a match to the big role midna had in TP
13) Ill say it again (2 times in one post hope u dont repeat it)
Melee had less time to be developed than brawl has rite now, melee had what 2 years, and was delayed, and look at what characters we got: pichu, doc, y.link being a clone, skull kid would have been perfect, but due to lack of time, he couldnt be in, its sad really...
Rite now sakurai has had over 2 years now, and all 07 to finish it, thats 3 years or mor eif its delayed, thats more than enough time to add all the characters he wants and avoid clones by giving them unique movesets, we may get 1 or 2 clones, but thats it, point is midna aint in the same situation as SK, because brawl has more time for development athn melee...
MM is one of the most popular zelda games? rite now TP is the most popular, thus midna has a better chance...
14) *Hopin tingle aint in brawl*
15) and Imp from another dimension who is a princess, knows magic, and can use her hair as a weapon, hard to find anything more unique than that in the zelda series...
16) Midna is more recent, is more popular, had the biggest role in (rite now in recent days) the most popular zelda game, and not only that, what we lack in smash are females, she fits the bill, were gonna have way more villains in brawl:
Metaknight (more like a rival, but hes an enemy u face in the game), dedede (hes practically in), ganondorf, mewtwo (if the returns), bowser, bowser jr (highly likely), vaati/zant, ridley, wolf... so on...
Theres only a handful of female characters, and shes perfect for the spot...
17) Umm they released the on on GC *sigh* theres no excuse, u cant judge her if u havent played the game... glad I got my wii on launch XD
18) Cmon I know enough about metaknight, yet Ive never played a kirby game, So I know I can judge him properly, and never do, same with pit, zamus (never played zero mission) and so on... the popular term is: U cant judge a book by its cover...
Hahaha I thought the harry potter book was ognna be uber lame, even though I knew everyting by ifno and movies, yet I read it and liked it, shpws how true that quote is... (FYI I dont read harry potter anymore, only read it when was a kid
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4549/b4549efa6954b46e3ec2fcf09ea12c66d23bf95a" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
)
19) Porven time and time again