Gova
I'm goin' for it!
Do stuff? Like what?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
In D1 there was conflicts with Nicholas that contained him that looked TvT to me. In fact, all of the conversations that had Nich in them looked almost IDENTICAL: Ryker vs Nich, Gheb vs Nich, and Legolas vs Nich.Do stuff? Like what?
This is rolefishing at this time.Before explaining though, I need to ask something... Kantrip, are you sure you got roleblocked, or are you just guessing because your NKill didn't work?
Rajam really needs to die somehow, but he hasn't exactly been playing scummy per se, he just hasn't been.... playing.@Raziek: Who is scummier between Red Ryu, Inferno, and Rajam to you?
I knew something else bugged me. I don't like the sudden switch off of me and onto Glyph. It doesn't feel natural and I think Red Ryu hated my slot much more than what this post lets on about his feelings for Glyph's slot.1. Raziek - Null. - might be willing to lynch if inactivity is a problem, but otherise sits at null for me. Can't remember much play wise.
2. Legolas - Leaning town. - Can't see why he is scum at all. I think his pushes on Glyph are entirely warrented along with the general pushes at everyone who targetted
3. Ryker - He is town. I refuse to beleieve otherwise, Nich killed himself, after reading all the stuff Ryker posted to get him lynched I refuse to beleive he would do this as scum with this much effort.
4. Orbo - Null - Sitting here atm, not much to say.
5. Inferno3044 - null, Got to remember how he plays, he's fine but I can't get a good read on him from his posts, would lynch but not someone I prefer to go for.
7. Kantrip - Scum - Please kill him. I hate his D1 play and his nonexistant D2 play is enough to make me want to kill him.
8. Gova - Leaning town. Why is this guy scum? Every post when he comes back to post is content. No fluff, no deflection, it's just pure content and thought. This isn't Gova from Ragnarok.
9. Red Ryu - eanut:
10. Rajam - Null, ignoring activity it's not a scum tell, would lynch if it was necessary but not to the point to of others like Kantrip and Glyph.
11. Sangfroid Warrior - Null, is he/she playing?, sorry can't remember gender atm, If she posts more I can get a read, need to look at question wise.
12. Glyph - Scum - hate him, he has no town motivation from what I can see from his responses outside of deflection to his past posts.
13. Gheb - town, even with his suspicion of me I like his posting style to look around at the roaster, and contribute a fair amount.
~
Still working on my reread of Gheb and Ryker, Kantrip can wait, I got my play for the day
unvote
Vote: Glyph
Don't see why I should answer this.@Gheb: Between Gova, Raziek, and Glyph: You can kill one, make one safe until LyLo, and leave one as is. What do you do to each one?
Because it lines up with all the issues I had with you all game. It's not like I didn't openly voice why I dislike you during almost the entire game, is it? It's just that I couldn't clearly find a scum / anti-town intent between your lack of genuine, fresh input and your constant hydra johns. Out of context those are all null-tells. But within the new context - you directly interfering a promising exchange - I can see the more sinister side of what you've been doing so far.Hmmmm, well okay then. Only two questions, both at Gheb and Ryker.
1. Even if you two interpret what we did as an anti-town move, why do you think that it is worthy of a vote (@Ryker, besides from anything else about us that you don't like)?
Most of it can be found towards the end of Day 1. I'm still pointing out things I don't like about him on Day 2 ... to give a really short, percise summary it's his attempts to please all sides that make me dislike him the most. When I look at his scum and town picks he's looking for agreement by putting "obvtownies" in the "obvtownlists" alongside looking for agreement by randomly putting a suspicious player in there as well. His scumpicks seem entirely based on a "nobody will disagree with the lynch of these guys"-logic. For all I can see, he has no reason to believe Red Ryu to be scum [and that's coming from somebody who voted Ryu until recently] and Inferno is just safe / convenient to have in a scumlist.2. Both of you have stated suspicion against Kantrip. I want to know why. Mostly you Gheb. If you've already stated why somewhere else then feel free to quote it to me.
Rajam really needs to die somehow, but he hasn't exactly been playing scummy per se, he just hasn't been.... playing.
I have a Town read on Inferno, that leaves Ruy as scummiest primarily by PoE, though I would rather Rajam die than him.
After Walgreens I may actually be willing to cut Rajam some slack for now. Right now it seems that him randomly digging up past information is more distracting to more recent issues than helpful. But it also may contain some interesting things that - with a new perspective caused by a flip or a NA result - turn out to be useful in retrospect that might've been missed back when it was originally posted. He was also able to provide some [dis-]connections at the end of Walgreens D2 - some of which turned out to be true upon the game's end.I agree that Rajam has been absent from actually playing this game, yes. When he DOES post he wastes time with useless stuff. That's why I TRIED to Split Punch him but somehow that got tampered with.
Adding Orbo to that list for now too unless he's getting behind his "homework" soon. I really want him to look into Red Ryu ... not only do we need stances from him but fresh input that works regardless of NA / claims would be really appreciated right about now as well.[...] and if it's about "getting rid of somebody" Inferno has to die before Rajam imho.
A lack of genuine, fresh input?Because it lines up with all the issues I had with you all game. It's not like I didn't openly voice why I dislike you during almost the entire game, is it? It's just that I couldn't clearly find a scum / anti-town intent between your lack of genuine, fresh input and your constant hydra johns. Out of context those are all null-tells. But within the new context - you directly interfering a promising exchange - I can see the more sinister side of what you've been doing so far.
I wouldn't put it like that. He didn't really seem concerned with buddying Nich, more so I simply think he was trying to stop his lynch. Seems like a risky position for a scum Kantrip to put himself into when it was already pretty clear that Nich was doomed.What exactly is it that he wouldn't have done though? Randomly buddy up a doomed townie?
But Ryker also has a tendency to tunnel and lead town in bad directions; he doesn't think as logically as Gheb and relies on pressure and gambits to get his reads. He can be bargained with and cooperated with only if you agree with what he says. Note: I'm not saying Gheb is better to keep alive than Ryker, I'm just pointing out the flaws in this.I would execute Gheb. Ryker is easier to cooperate with and is more open with town and in some cases can even be bargained with. Gheb is more closeted and sometimes won't give his opinion or answer questions when asked for them.
Inferno, would you really only vote Glyph if you were sold on it by some other person? Cuz that's not screaming "Look at me, I'm a sheep" to anyone.Definitely some good points, but not fully sold yet. I do think Glyph hasn't committed many stances if any and he points out a lot of fluff, but I wouldn't say Glyph is pinned. If it were close to the deadline, I would be willing to vote him. Unless Legolas has more information/reasons to share, I don't wanna vote him just yet.
I agree with this almost completely. We shouldn't rely in them, but, they are still useful and ignoring them even just a little bit could hurt town, especially with the way the setup is turning out to look like.I'd rather just throw out the idea of relying on roles, claims and abilities at all [at least for now] and declare that my mains scum picks - purely based on play - are Ryu, Kantrip and Raziek, with Lego and Ryker being null reads / not worthy of trust.
Nah, it's alright. You are forgiven.Sang I am sorry for calling you a guy.
please forgive me.
Well, the only logical thing to me, from what you are saying, is that Rajam was able to redirect that onto me, since redirecting usually requires that person to be targeted. From a town perspective, I can understand targeting Seph because he was completely inactive. Nobody knew until near the end of the night phase that I was replacing Seph. That would have effectively gotten rid of a questionable player. From a scum perspective, it would just be adding another kill onto a townie. Decision didn't matter.@Sang: Yeah I kind of picked up what you were getting at with how curious you have been about my ability. I doubt that there is another person with the same ability, so I'm pretty sure there is some kind of redirecting going on. What I don't get is: Why would something be redirected from Rajam to Seph?
Two possibilities in my eyes:
1. Rajam can redirect things off of himself and chose Seph for some reason.
2. Some scum redirector figured a vig would be on Rajam so they decided to redirect off of Rajam and onto someone they wanted dead. The question then becomes: Why would they choose Sang? Because he was lined up to be replaced and they wanted to knock out whoever replaced in with a fresh perspective? -shrug-
It's not adding up to me.
What use does this have to us? Just because we know who the calculator is doesn't mean that it will give us any help. That leaves everyone but one person open. Hoping that this will help us is just wasting our time.Also I realized due to the existence of the calculator class, we should be jotting down what everyone's post number is at every Night phase. That way we can decipher who may or may not have been roleblocked by a calculator.
Once again, my reasoning was that discussion (and pressure) based on false interpretation of night actions and roles would be fruitless. This also stands for pressure, as pressure isn't pressure when it's based on a miscommunication.???? If you think I am scum, wouldn't you be glad that Ryker was voting for me? Also, didn't you think I was scum in general? Wouldn't you want the pressure Glyph was giving me to continue???
Okay that was probably bad wording. I wouldn't say that Glyph was scum right now (although I'm not fully opposed to his lynch) but if Legolas made a really good case that made me think "Wow! this guy has some really good points I didn't see" I would vote Glyph. Yeah it's a sheepish vote.Inferno, would you really only vote Glyph if you were sold on it by some other person? Cuz that's not screaming "Look at me, I'm a sheep" to anyone.
Maybe. I've never seen it before but that doesn't mean it can't be there, I guess.Nah Sang I could easily see a redirector who does something like chooses one player whose action they redirect onto another player of their choice.
I must not be understanding. Even if you do that, there are still too many options of what could or could not have happened. We don't even know if there is a calculator in this game. Also, there are 15 possibilities of what the outcome could be, multiplied by the number of people who have posts evenly divisible by that number. It doesn't have to be a roleblock; there are 4 other powers that a calculator can use. From what I understand, the calculator chooses a number then the power. They don't correspond. I feel like this will be a huge waste of time on speculation and that, in the end, it won't really help us. Feel free to do whatever you wish, though, but be careful. Scum could have this ability as well.kanty said:Are you understanding what I'm saying about the calculator thing?
If we jot down numbers of posts every Night phase, then we can keep those numbers for when the thread opens again and they inevitably change. That way we know what every person's post count WAS at during the Night, an which ones were divisible by which numbers. In doing that we find out all the possible roleblocks due to calculator.
Alright. I guess my real question was: Do you think Glyph could be scum?Okay that was probably bad wording. I wouldn't say that Glyph was scum right now (although I'm not fully opposed to his lynch) but if Legolas made a really good case that made me think "Wow! this guy has some really good points I didn't see" I would vote Glyph. Yeah it's a sheepish vote.
All I'm saying is that I will write down every player's post count each Night phase. That way we know what everyone's post count was divisible by, since the ability affects ALL PLAYERS who have a post count divisible by the number they choose.I must not be understanding. Even if you do that, there are still too many options of what could or could not have happened. We don't even know if there is a calculator in this game. Also, there are 15 possibilities of what the outcome could be, multiplied by the number of people who have posts evenly divisible by that number. It doesn't have to be a roleblock; there are 4 other powers that a calculator can use. From what I understand, the calculator chooses a number then the power. They don't correspond. I feel like this will be a huge waste of time on speculation and that, in the end, it won't really help us. Feel free to do whatever you wish, though, but be careful. Scum could have this ability as well.
What THE HELL is risky about that? Nich's fate was sealed and all that was left was to collect the townie points for defending the dead townie. Very common play by bad scum.I wouldn't put it like that. He didn't really seem concerned with buddying Nich, more so I simply think he was trying to stop his lynch. Seems like a risky position for a scum Kantrip to put himself into when it was already pretty clear that Nich was doomed.
I really dunno if I should feel insulted or not. Also, someone didn't read any of Day 1 apparently.But Ryker also has a tendency to tunnel and lead town in bad directions; he doesn't think as logically as Gheb and relies on pressure and gambits to get his reads. He can be bargained with and cooperated with only if you agree with what he says. Note: I'm not saying Gheb is better to keep alive than Ryker, I'm just pointing out the flaws in this.
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwww.Oh yeah and Gheb, I think you an Ryker should claim just as someone claims when they are put at L-1. One of you is guaranteed to die, so why not get claims to help in our decision? It's different than NA speculation.