I think "earned" doesnt really help your arguement to much here.
My point is this. In the original tournament thread, the host outlined how much of each entry was going towards the pot, and how much was going towards venue fee. Therefore, people attended and entered, all the while keeping in mind that the winners would be given X amount of dollars (the distribution wasn't actually posted in the original thread, so it's entirely possible that m2k in particular didn't get screwed, but SOMEONE did). To go back and change your mind after the fact is no different from an employer retroactively changing your wages at the end of the pay period. It's dishonest and slimy.
He played a game and made 1000
How he got the money is irrelevant. What IS relevant is that he played by the rules laid out beforehand and earned the amount that was promised. If people buy raffle tickets for a full boat, and instead get a toy boat, you bet your *** they'd be upset. It's irrelevant that they did nothing except put their name in a hat and sit around - the rules stated that they'd get a boat.
i mean its not like i want him to lose money
I'm sorry if it's come across this way, but I'm not assuming any malice here, or making accusations of foul play.
but its also out of everyones control (except for frames, who already made a decision).
And the whole argument here is that the decision was wrong. "What's done is done" doesn't resolve anything. Maybe there's no way to give m2k the money he deserves at this point, but there is no doubt that similar situations will arise in the future, and it makes sense to me that people know the "right" things to do.
In the end, he still makes 1000, for having fun for 4 days (and not working, which is why i think earned isnt a good word for this).
It's plenty possible for people to enjoy their jobs. It's also plenty possible for people to not enjoy brawl (lol). Whether he liked the event or not is irrelevant - by the rules, he (and/or the other people getting paid out) should have been given more than they were.
W/e its already happened, its over, it should just be dropped.
awful, awful logic. Questioning "authority" is the basis of American society. And presenting personal viewpoints is the basis of internet forums.
Once again, I don't actually know the situation, so what I assume happened is that someone brought an xbox, it was stolen, and so the host decided to pay the price of the xbox out of the prize pool.
Given that this is the case, instead of what actually happened, one of two things should have transpired...
1) If the rules of the tournament made it clear that the host would be responsible for the setups, then the host or hosting organization needs to take personal responsibility. If I check in luggage with an airline, I clearly expect to receive my bags at the end of the trip. If not, it's up to them to figure out where it went, and/or reimburse me for any losses.
2) On the other hand, if there was no such promise, then the person who owns the xbox is at fault for being "irresponsible" with his possessions. If I just leave my bag at the airport McDonald's while I go to the bathroom and it's gone when I get back, it's no one's fault but my own. Does it suck? Sure it does, but that's life.
In no scenario would I involve a third person and make them pay for my losses. If your luggage gets lost, the airline won't make the guy sitting next to you share his clothes with you for the remainder of the trip
Edit: just to be clear, this isn't a "new" or "unique" situation.
At VLS last year, someone stole a decent portion of the prize money. You know what the organizers did? They paid out the expected amount anyway.
Just a few weeks ago, Mew2King (IRONY) had his wii stolen at a tournament. Was he reimbursed for it? Certainly not. Did he ask to be? I don't know for sure, but it's pretty clear that this incident has a drastic effect on his current outlook on the situation