Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Not really. Dayvig gambits have been used a ton; it's a lot more common than actual dayvig roles.
So you even admit that it's a common gambit
Yea, Dark Horse is really leaning scum right now. I think I'll hold my vote a little longer until more people have their say on this. There are still some people not doing much.
Yes, I thought it was a gambit.
Vote: Gargalione
Inferno I think you missed this ^
Not voting isn't necessarily the equivalent of not doing anything. I'm holding my vote because my opinion on Dark Horse might just be a lapse of judgement that could change seeing how he/she interacts with other players who haven't necessarily done anything yet. I'm not being deliberately passive, nor am I just waiting to blindly jump on a wagon.
I was just waiting to see how DH responds to something else before I lay down my vote. In the last 2 (and only 2) games I played, there was that someone that we were so 'sure' was scum, then with the flip, they just turned out to just be a townie who apparently really sucked. You might think relying my personal anecdote is silly, but honestly, I don't want to make the same mistake again.
Mainly because of his anxiety to attack Hound, calling him noobscum and whatnot. I'm aware I questioned Hound's actions earlier, but it was in no way an attack, like DH's post. It was simply scummy behavior on his/her part.
If this is why you're voting him, then that's a stretch. I agree that more or less all we have is our voice and vote, but just because he doesn't want to lay his vote just yet doesn't make him scum.
Mislynches happen and it's part of the game. But I would recommend putting a vote on who you think is scum. If he was at L-2 then I would understand but it's just Gheb and myself voting him iirc. The only way town can kill scum is through lynching so putting down your vote is always helpful. If you think Dark Horse is possibly scum, put your vote on him.
False. Putting votes on people also forms pressure on the person which helps the rest of the roster get a read on him. By not voting you aren't using the only weapon town has to eradicate scum (assuming no vig).
... Honestly, you're right. Even if I change my mind, I could always just unvote. Vote: DarkHorse
i cant tell if thats a fair assessment cuz i dunno how you reached that conclusion and theres no obvious way for me to deduct how you did so specially so early. can you go into more detail so i have an idea where youre coming from?
-_-
Can you elaborate on the bolded?
Damn, this guy is classy as hell; I like him so far. RVS is pretty miniscule and posting habits can change, so yeah I agree with that.
I get where you're coming from here, but actions speak louder than words. At the end of the day, no matter what you say, your vote is meant to be somewhere where it's not. At least at this time, and all we have is the memory that "hey, he said he didn't like that guy". How are we supposed to know when your mind changes on Dark Horse or if it stays the same? How can we pinpoint that?
Hey Kary, could you explain the purpose of these questions? There are more questions of yours I can't see the purpose of, and I'd just like to know why you ask the questions you do. The first one, where you ask Soup why he chose you: What possible answer did you expect from him? Are there certain answers that would have changed your opinion of Soup? If so, what kind of answers were you looking for to make him seem townier/scummier? Otherwise, be honest, were you just asking for the sake of asking?
I don't agree with having a definitive read on Kary so soon. Is his intent pure with his questions that he's tossing around? Think back to Awkward Moments, when a certain newbie traitor (hint: It's Kantrip) was throwing out random questions. Is this not a similar scenario? Or do you see something I'm missing?
Here's another one. Why are you asking the slot you're asking this question? Be honest: Was there a reason, or did you just randomly pick someone for some arbitrary reason? At the time of asking this question, what were your thoughts on Soup's play?
Please elaborate for me. What about the reaction was "very good"?
This is fair enough, but I don't think it should be too telling. It's pretty easy to come up with something like that, but I can see where you're coming from on this one.
Why did you ask Kataefi this? Even worse, what made you choose Roxy and Gargaglione? Did you even consider how much content those two players had to work with. What kind of answer did you POSSIBLY expect? Once again, I'd like an honest answer: Are you putting thought into this question, or did you just ask someone random to give an opinion on two random players?
Oh my. What are you going to do with Garg's strongest town read?
I wasn't prodded to vote; Inferno made me rethink my actions, and voting seemed like the most sensible thing to do.
You spelled my name wrong... I'll remember this...
[glow]I'm all caught up now and I have no issues with Ranmaru
Hey marshy. Here's what I was thinking about your play so far. In essence, I thought that you were more interested in responding to other players than creating discussion yourself.
For example, both of these questions ask for a player to clarify what they were thinking- but they don't do very much beyond that. They also seemed like questions that anyone could ask. From this, I got the impression that you would rather watch how the day progressed than get particularly involved. As I said, it is just a feeling, but I was wondering whether this is typical of your play- and I recalled that Sherlock Hound suggested something similar:
Hopefully that makes my train of thought a bit clearer?
