You say that, but they've already added Villager.Hahaha, no. Nuh-uh. HAHA. You take Smash Bros, and add f**king Silent Hill? No. Not a chance. Get that fake away from me.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You say that, but they've already added Villager.Hahaha, no. Nuh-uh. HAHA. You take Smash Bros, and add f**king Silent Hill? No. Not a chance. Get that fake away from me.
What about the first two?Why do I have a reputation as a leak debunker? I'm absolutely horrible at that, and I think we've proven that more and more as time goes on.
If you really want my opinion, though, I highly doubt that the CSS Leak is real. It all comes down to the circumstances of the leak. The whole "I just managed to catch the very corner of Ridley's box" is what gets me. It seems exactly like something a faker without the official artwork would do. Add in the pixel issue and the ease of replication, and I'm not really sweating this one out anymore.
Yes but so were Doctor Mario and Roy, and I don't see them returning.While certainly, Mewtwo was not playable in Brawl, it is well known that evidence of his planned inclusion was present in the code for the game, so technically he was a "lock" that simply was left unfinished. Going back to how much the community wants him and Sakurai's response at the round table where he was brought up, I can imagine that Sakurai would definitely want to work to put him in the game this time around in order to appease the fans that were disgruntled when they found he was planned but not finished in Brawl.
why you didn't bring this earlier CHECK THE THREAD WITH THE IP THING!!!Obvious fake trying to hop on the leaker train aside, 4chan *does* have an archive.
This thread's archive can be seen here:
http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244944761/
As a matter of fact, if you have the addon 4chanX, it will automatically route dead links to its respective archive page.
Who knows? XDI'm losing track of all the leakers. Which leaker leaked what again? This is what I got in my head:
Leaker A: Leaked Pics 1 and 2.
Leaker B: Leaked Pics 3, 4, 6, and 7.
Leaker C: Leaked Pic 5
Did I get it right?
Ridley? Is that you?
Hmm... I'm skeptical that there'd be that degree of shared UI between the two versions, given the massive resolution difference and the fact that the 3DS has 2 screens with the bottom screen being fullscreen rather than widescreen. But I can't prove otherwise. So I guess it's a moot point.We concluded earlier there may be no hand, due to the 3DS version, as well as the Wii U version having the Gamepad, so it may just be the cursors to standardize it between versions.
We've had several people do the same thing and, honestly, I don't think your leak would've been nearly as popular. It's good you cut out the Mii's and their names on the right side 'cause that would've had the major consensus be that your leak was fake.It's easy to do fake leaks.
I even thought that the characters would be blocked.
We concluded that the 3DS could use a scrolling system. Please, read the thread.Hmm... I'm skeptical that there'd be that degree of shared UI between the two versions, given the massive resolution difference and the fact that the 3DS has 2 screens with the bottom screen being fullscreen rather than widescreen. But I can't prove otherwise. So I guess it's a moot point.
So that's some evidence towards it being a glitch considering this is a seperate shot. Sorry if I'm behind guys, I'm catching up. Just when I got input I say it. Ignore me if I'm too behind.Wait a sec, the Ridley pixel doesn't look of in this one. I know it's hard to see, but it looks correct this time.
Edit: I looked again, this matches that one off pixel.
I don't think somebody could've taken pics 1 and 2 to produce 3 and 4.Someone please answer me! Who leaked what? I'm confused to all hell now! This is what I THINK who leaked stuff:
Leaker A: Leaked pictures 1 and 2. Nothing is wrong with them so they might be real.
Leaker B: Made Photoshoped versions of Pics 1 and 2 to make Pics 3, 4, 6, and 7. The 6th picture is fine, but the author mentions how to unlock Ridley, so he has to be the same leaker who leaked pics 3 and 7.
Leaker C: Clearly photoshopped Pic 4 to make Pic 5. This Pic messed up so much that it had to be made by a 3rd party.
That's my train of thought.
That's what I thought to! So I assumed the guy who made pics 1 and 2 made pics 3 and 4! However everyone said I was wrong for some reason! Because if that was true, this leak would be fake!I don't think somebody could've taken pics 1 and 2 to produce 3 and 4.
3 and 4 are so much sharper, so the only thing I can think of is if they reproduced the whole thing from scratch or if Leaker A and B both have some clean version that they're both editing and then skewing before posting.
Maybe this will make more sense. 1 and 2 were posted together by the original leaker. 3 and 4 were posted together by a faker. 5 was another faker. 6 might be the original leaker but we don't know. 7 claims to be someone other than the original leaker, and is likely just another faker.Someone please answer me! Who leaked what? I'm confused to all hell now! This is what I THINK who leaked stuff:
Leaker A: Leaked pictures 1 and 2. Nothing is wrong with them so they might be real.
Leaker B: Made Photoshoped versions of Pics 1 and 2 to make Pics 3, 4, 6, and 7. The 6th picture is fine, but the author mentions how to unlock Ridley, so he has to be the same leaker who leaked pics 3 and 7.
Leaker C: Clearly photoshopped Pic 4 to make Pic 5. This Pic messed up so much that it had to be made by a 3rd party.
That's my train of thought.
Forgive me for not wanting to waste my time. =PWe concluded that the 3DS could use a scrolling system. Please, read the thread.
6 doesn't have any credibility because he said how to unlock Ridley! This coincides with the story of Pics 3 and 4 with the separate versions! If this was taken by the same guy who made pics 1 and 2, why would he be supporting false evidence!Maybe this will make more sense. 1 and 2 were posted together by the original leaker. 3 and 4 were posted together by a faker. 5 was another faker. 6 might be the original leaker but we don't know. 7 claims to be someone other than the original leaker, and is likely just another faker.
It doesn't matter how many fake "leakers" there are. It just matters which ones have credibility, and the ones with credibility are the ones posted by the original leaker (which are 1, 2, and maybe 6)
Because holy crap, fast moving thread with 50+ replies, and I dunno which thread claimed the ip matched the first two pics. If it's there, I can at least look for it and link it.why you didn't bring this earlier CHECK THE THREAD WITH THE IP THING!!!
I got the addon and if you want, I can link all the thread.Because holy crap, fast moving thread with 50+ replies, and I dunno which thread claimed the ip matched the first two pics. If it's there, I can at least look for it and link it.
Please do! I want this to be done!I got the addon and if you want, I can link all the thread.
Because holy crap, fast moving thread with 50+ replies, and I dunno which thread claimed the ip matched the first two pics. If it's there, I can at least look for it and link it.
That is how these speculation threads go. Just give it time to die down.man im gone for a few hours and nothing much has changed lol
to troll, tbh if 6 was posted by the first guy he could have seen what the other guy posted and decided to troll as well, it is 4chan after.6 doesn't have any credibility because he said how to unlock Ridley! This coincides with the story of Pics 3 and 4 with the separate versions! If this was taken by the same guy who made pics 1 and 2, why would he be supporting false evidence!
That doesn't prove much though.So for anyone wondering, the lock is apparently easy to make:
http://i.4cdn.org/v/1401070186903.png
its because if its true it means we are getting 50 characters which to me was more then i thought we were getting, i was expecting 45-48 at mostOh holy ****, I didn't even notice that there are so many people viewing this thread. These new leaks seem to be the most interesting ones yet since Palutena!
Ok but I sugest getting the addon it's 4chanXPlease do! I want this to be done!
If the Gematsu leak is true plus Ridley we would only get 13 newcomers which is pretty small.its because if its true it means we are getting 50 characters which to me was more then i thought we were getting, i was expecting 45-48 at most
So was the pencil on the brawl leak.So for anyone wondering, the lock is apparently easy to make:
http://i.4cdn.org/v/1401070186903.png
13 is roughly how many characters we get each game.If the Gematsu leak is true plus Ridley we would only get 13 newcomers which is pretty small.
im not sure how long they last now they use to last for quite a while once archived but it might have changedOk but I sugest getting the addon it's 4chanX
First thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244912381/
Second thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244932457/
Third thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244944761/
Fourth thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244952647/
Fifth thread (active): http://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/245069064
How long does this archive last? is it possible to keep this page in .html forever on my computer?
Threads 1 through 3 seem to be made my people who found the pictures elsewhere.....Ok but I sugest getting the addon it's 4chanX
First thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244912381/
Second thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244932457/
Third thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244944761/
Fourth thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244952647/
Fifth thread (active): http://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/245069064
How long does this archive last? is it possible to keep this page in .html forever on my computer?
Because you are. This doesn't mean anything. Any you keep saying because Pic 6 mentioned Ridley, he has to be the pic 3 leaker. Which, in fact, it doesn't. Get that through your head please we've told you a billion times. You're a smart dude I've seen you make some good posts here. Just stop repeating stuff we've already answeredThat's what I thought to! So I assumed the guy who made pics 1 and 2 made pics 3 and 4! However everyone said I was wrong for some reason! Because if that was true, this leak would be fake!
For those looking for it, I believe that the fourth thread is the one that supposedly talks about the IP address being the same as the original 2 pics.Ok but I sugest getting the addon it's 4chanX
First thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244912381/
Second thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244932457/
Third thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244944761/
Fourth thread: http://boards.deniableplausibility.net/v/thread/244952647/
Fifth thread (active): http://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/245069064
How long does this archive last? is it possible to keep this page in .html forever on my computer?
wasnt the pencil just some clip art or am i crazySo was the pencil on the brawl leak.
13 is roughly how many characters we get each game.