Shroob
Sup?
Yes, but they only took 4 roster slots. Yes, they were considered 6 characters by Sakurai, but they only took 4 slots.Pokemon had 6 reps in brawl(almost 7) having 6 in this isn't a stretch at all.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yes, but they only took 4 roster slots. Yes, they were considered 6 characters by Sakurai, but they only took 4 slots.Pokemon had 6 reps in brawl(almost 7) having 6 in this isn't a stretch at all.
What about it?Yeah; Ridley isn't cartoony enough.
What about this?
![]()
Evidence that he photoshopped material from those images. Especially the fact that the Player 1 red icon over Marth is in the exact same place as it is in pics 1 and 2. Copy and paste.But he said that he got the pictures from the original guy. That doesn't change much.
Pics 1 and 2 show the red hockey puck on Marth. Pic 3 showed Ridley being selected by player 2.
This new 7th picture shows both of those elements, including Ridley's name plate being one pixel higher.
This photo makes no sense to me. We can see the pixels, but the image has motion blur. We shouldn't be able to see a grid ON TOP of the motion blur. This image is nonsensical. =PYeah; Ridley isn't cartoony enough.
What about this?
![]()
He got the pictures from me, I'm the original guy.But he said that he got the pictures from the original guy. That doesn't change much.
Pics 1 and 2 show the red hockey puck on Marth. Pic 3 showed Ridley being selected by player 2.
This new 7th picture shows both of those elements, including Ridley's name plate being one pixel higher.
Nothing but a blurred pic.Yeah; Ridley isn't cartoony enough.
What about this?
![]()
True for the Ridley Image? The image is too blurry for me to do any measuring or deduction. =/Hex, earlier you did that thing concerning the circle on player 2 slot. Considering this image is likely from the maker of image 3, could you check to see if your previous findings are still true for this new image?
Exactly. Like I said it's not a stretch for them to have 6 again.Yes, but they only took 4 roster slots. Yes, they were considered 6 characters by Sakurai, but they only took 4 slots.
That most definently does not mean he was the same person that posted 3 and 4. He's just saying how you unlock Ridley. He's posting this a while after each other. He may not have even known the fakes exist.
But until we have evidence that Mewtwo is coming back, I don't think we can assume him as a 'lock'. He was a 'lock' for Brawl and we got burned. What I'm saying in, there's too much nothing to make something out of it.Exactly. Like I said it's not a stretch for them to have 6 again.
Photoshop the first 2 to create all of these. It's proof of nothing.![]()
What does that even mean!
The 6th Pic guy told us how you unlock Ridley!
7th pic guy showed us Ridley!
3rd pic guy showed us a hint of Ridley!
The first 2 pics show us him selecting Marth with the red hockey puck!
There are smudges on the screen!
Why would Marth's red hockey puck be there if the original 2 pictures were from the Best Buy demo and the 3rd, and 7th pic be from the invitational version!
It is because THIS IS ALL FAKE! GAAAAAAH!.
I didn't say anything about Mewtwo.But until we have evidence that Mewtwo is coming back, I don't think we can assume him as a 'lock'. He was a 'lock' for Brawl and we got burned. What I'm saying in, there's too much nothing to make something out of it.
Because the pictures from 3 on are fake?Why would Marth's red hockey puck be there if the original 2 pictures were from the Best Buy demo and the 3rd, and 7th pic be from the invitational version!.
I thought it was weird that no one was talking about it or trying to decipher it, or that it wasn't even posted here.What about it?
Well, he's arguably the only candidate. I highly doubt Sceptile/Blaziken's chances, and Squirtle and Ivysaur are more likely than not cut.I didn't say anything about Mewtwo.
People would still cry fake.I hope we get a legit leak soon.
This had actually crossed my mind earlier. However, I believe if this were the case, there would be no space between Diddy and Kirby, and there would be a space for Olimar after the three Kirby characters, so as to follow the Brawl CSS once again.I always viewed Pikmin being in Kirby's column in Brawl as the cute column. Perhaps you could put them together in the row like this on the same basis, grouping the cute characters together.
What's to decipher? It's just a blurry as **** pic of confirmed characters.I thought it was weird that no one was talking about it or trying to decipher it, or that it wasn't even posted here.
I'm glad even in the most hectic of times, Earth President Nixon is there to guide us.The 7th image confirms absolutely nothing, because it's fake. That Ridley isn't just ugly; he's miles away from Smash 4's art style. Guy probably drew or edited it himself.
I think this raises an age old question of..........................................................
...
...
...
Okay I think that we can ALL agree on one question that confuse us and that the answer will solve
E V E R Y T H I N G.
WHO POSTED WHAT FOR THE LOVE OF GOD???????
and this is why I HATE 4CHAN!!!I think this raises an age old question of...
But who was phone? With 4chan being how it is, it's impossible to decipher who is who. One person can easily pretend to be multiple people and you can't prove it's not them.
We concluded earlier there may be no hand, due to the 3DS version, as well as the Wii U version having the Gamepad, so it may just be the cursors to standardize it between versions.Why can se wee part of the parallelogram player slot thing through Ridley as if he's semitransparent? You can see it through his wing AND his head. That would make sense if they're still hovering over them, but there's no hand cursor to be found indicating that the little puck is still being held. Same deal with Marth in the first pics. Unless there's just no hand cursor yet, but that would be kinda confusing... why outline the box in the player color if they haven't selected yet?
Hahaha, no. Nuh-uh. HAHA. You take Smash Bros, and add f**king Silent Hill? No. Not a chance. Get that fake away from me.![]()
"Hello. First of all an explanation. I'm *not* the leaker that took the demo photos of Smash. I am the one who egged him on to do it though... apologies if the guy didn't know much about the game--he just sets up the stuff. Anyhow, he sent me maybe 14 photos in all. We were afraid to post them all, but he said I could show the ones I kept with *new* info as long as it's only of the screen. It seems like he's safe from getting caught. So here ya go."
4CHAN
While certainly, Mewtwo was not playable in Brawl, it is well known that evidence of his planned inclusion was present in the code for the game, so technically he was a "lock" that simply was left unfinished. Going back to how much the community wants him and Sakurai's response at the round table where he was brought up, I can imagine that Sakurai would definitely want to work to put him in the game this time around in order to appease the fans that were disgruntled when they found he was planned but not finished in Brawl.But until we have evidence that Mewtwo is coming back, I don't think we can assume him as a 'lock'. He was a 'lock' for Brawl and we got burned. What I'm saying in, there's too much nothing to make something out of it.
Why do I have a reputation as a leak debunker? I'm absolutely horrible at that, and I think we've proven that more and more as time goes on.By the way, what do you think O' leak debunker?
I'm losing track of all the leakers. Which leaker leaked what again? This is what I got in my head:
Leaker A: Leaked Pics 1 and 2.
Leaker B: Leaked Pics 3, 4, 6, and 7.
Leaker C: Leaked Pic 5
Did I get it right?