ChunkyBeef
Smash Lord
It's likely filling in a niche that Mega Man Universe left open.It sounds awesome actually. There are many creative people out there capable of creating some great stages for the game.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's likely filling in a niche that Mega Man Universe left open.It sounds awesome actually. There are many creative people out there capable of creating some great stages for the game.
That's too bad. I would've like the fact that Hades was playable.Yeah, I think Leakerbro is pretty clearly full of ****.
I wouldn't personally. Medusa should get top priority over Hades as she's the original main villain.That's too bad. I would've like the fact that Hades was playable.
What is a Palutena?I wouldn't personally. Medusa should get top priority over Hades as she's the original main villain.
But yeah this guy is just spewing a bunch of crap.
Obviously Palutena would get in before both Hades and Medusa. I was simply saying if KI were to get a THIRD rep, it should be Medusa, not Hades.What is a Palutena?
Obviously Palutena would get in before both Hades and Medusa. I was simply saying if KI were to get a THIRD rep, it should be Medusa, not Hades.
You mean four KI reps? Not gonna happen. Three is stretching it.
To be fair, it always sounded really fishy. Although, I feel as though that might be the nail in the coffin.LeakerBros...
So he can spoil us regarding new characters, but he "can't" comment on cut characters... Why? I say leaking new characters and secrets from other Nitnendo 1st party companies should be things that he "can't comment". But... cut characters?
As much as I WANT to believe him, now it sounds really fishy.
I agree with this perspective. Pit is currently a front-runner; as he was in Brawl. If he is to compare with the other front-runners, an additional Kid Icarus representative is not unfathomable, especially from a series that has so much to draw from. Asserting that two newcomers is "pushing it" is completely arbitrary. Our preconceived notions of the ideal roster might not be (are not) entirely accurate.Two new reps for KI isn't that hard to believe, after all, Sakurai worked in Uprising and he may want to put two characters from his game in Smash.
But three is stretching a lot.
Yo get this foolishness outta here. Bandana Dee? And how is it you can't comment on cut chars but can reveal every newcomer, veteran and they momma?New Leaker Bros post.
http://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/246659679/hello-to-everyone-yet-again-its-546-right-now-and
New post answering people:
Discuss.
Yeah yeah. I totally support two Kid Icarus newcomers (as long as they are Palutena + Medusa or Hades). The cast of Uprising is extremely charismatic.I agree with this perspective. Pit is currently a front-runner; as he was in Brawl. If he is to compare with the other front-runners, an additional Kid Icarus representative is not unfathomable, especially from a series that has so much to draw from. Asserting that two newcomers is "pushing it" is completely arbitrary. Our preconceived notions of the ideal roster might not be (are not) entirely accurate.
I meant in a future game. I doubt that we will get three in this game.You mean four KI reps? Not gonna happen. Three is stretching it.
Sal doesn't mention the total number of newcomers/characters nor claims that the characters on the gematsu leak are the only ones coming to the game. The only way this leak and the gematsu leak could conflict is if LeakerBros claimed that one of Sal's characters in not in the game, or its an Assist Trophy.So two more KI reps and another random Kirby rep? I know he's popular but he is a common enemy... I think 3 is pushing it for KI, and 4 for Kirby is overkill, not that the game doesnt deserve 4 but there isnt a 4th character on the level of Kirby, Dedede, and MetaKnight, and I thought Sakurai was going to stray away from prioritizing his babies... I swear if Bandana Dee makes it in before a plethora of more deserving characters I will be incredibly disappointed in Sakurai. If the roster is well into the 50's and approaching 60, I'll have no problem. But that's an extremely unlikely amount of newcomers. Unless Sal is wrong. I mean I'd prefer that. Do they conflict yet?
First off, Bandana Dee is not JUST a generic enemy. He's a long term character that is now the 4th main Kirby Character, having prominent roles including being playable. He deserves to be in a lot, and Kirby totally deserves 4 reps.So two more KI reps and another random Kirby rep? I know he's popular but he is a common enemy... I think 3 is pushing it for KI, and 4 for Kirby is overkill, not that the game doesnt deserve 4 but there isnt a 4th character on the level of Kirby, Dedede, and MetaKnight, and I thought Sakurai was going to stray away from prioritizing his babies... I swear if Bandana Dee makes it in before a plethora of more deserving characters I will be incredibly disappointed in Sakurai. If the roster is well into the 50's and approaching 60, I'll have no problem. But that's an extremely unlikely amount of newcomers. Unless Sal is wrong. I mean I'd prefer that. Do they conflict yet?
Pretty sure he said that Chrom was an Assist Trophy.Sal doesn't mention the total number of newcomers/characters nor claims that the characters on the gematsu leak are the only ones coming to the game. The only way this leak and the gematsu leak could conflict is if LeakerBros claimed that one of Sal's characters in not in the game, or its an Assist Trophy.
Bayonetta is third party right? This says first/second party...Bandana Dee is totally a generic enemy and including him over most deserving characters would be terrible.
Anyway, a wild new leak appears:
![]()
That was it, my mistake. But yeah, I'll be shocked if Delta Emerald is ever, ever used. (Though pretty hype...)
Looks believable to me. Hmm..Bandana Dee is totally a generic enemy and including him over most deserving characters would be terrible.
Anyway, a wild new leak appears:
![]()
Shulk, Robin, and a Zelda newcomer? *faints*New Leaker Bros post.
http://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/246659679/hello-to-everyone-yet-again-its-546-right-now-and
New post answering people:
Discuss.
Yes, Nintendo is only paying for the development.Bayonetta is third party right? This says first/second party...
- It wouldn't be the first time. The GBA titles were developed by Nintendo, while the GC titles were developed by Retro StudiosTwo different Metroid Games by different companies?
Bayonetta isn't a third party?
Monolith working on three games?
Where is the NFC game we are almost guaranteed?
This leak is completely false.
Edit: Also, Donkey Kong Jungle Beat? I'm fairly certain that already exists. Yep, it does, for the Gamecube.
Edit 2: And no Zelda Title. Wow this is bad. Also, Why on Earth would Nintendo use a placeholder title for an upcoming game that is exactly the same as one that already exists. That is completely illogical.
As fake as this **** is, I'd honestly not be surprised if Hyrule Warriors turned out to be final.Is Hyrule Warriors not a place holder title?
-Fair EnoughYes, Nintendo is only paying for the development.
- It wouldn't be the first time. The GBA titles were developed by Nintendo, while the GC titles were developed by Retro Studios
- Yes, it is
- Unlikely as ****
- Maybe the NFC game is the Mario Maker thing
- Donkey Kong Jungle Beat could be an HD port. Although it would likely have an "HD" in the title.
No, they confirmed the official title is Hyrule Warriors, at least in the West. In Japan, the name is simply "Zelda Musou".Is Hyrule Warriors not a place holder title?
Yeah, I don't believe it either. The Mario Maker thing was said to be a 3DS title, by the way, but in the "leak" it is listed as a Wii U game.All in all I still think the leak is false, but you make good points.