SMAASH! Puppy
Smash Legend
Even with that I don't think they'd do both.That and it mentions that both Crash and Spyro are playable, which I don't think will happen unless it was a specific request from Activision themselves.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Even with that I don't think they'd do both.That and it mentions that both Crash and Spyro are playable, which I don't think will happen unless it was a specific request from Activision themselves.
Mostly because Spyro's series was such a massive flop in Japan.The most I can see from Spyro is a hat honestly, assuming Crash gets in.
In the scenario I envisioned, it was basically Activision saying that they can't add Crash to the game unless they also add Spyro.Even with that I don't think they'd do both.
It did but only the first game from what I can tell, it was also on the Wii U so...I'm still wondering if he could get in though Skylanders. I don't know how big the series is/was over in Japan but I imagine it at least existed.
theres also a leaked 5 year plan document for plans regard crash. i dont think weve been able to confirm it but it's very possible Crash for Smash is among said plansWhy do people think Crash is so likely? All I know is that he's popular, and Crash 4's release date matches the presumed announcement of CP9.
I think Skylanders is long gone so I don't think Spyro's chances of getting in through this series could work.I'm still wondering if he could get in though Skylanders. I don't know how big the series is/was over in Japan but I imagine it at least existed.
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to see Liam Robertson upload his video about the current state of the franchise. I think he may have implied on Twitter that the "Crash in Smash" leak is fake, but I don't have a source, so don't quote me.theres also a leaked 5 year plan document for plans regard crash. i dont think weve been able to confirm it but it's very possible Crash for Smash is among said plans
Absolutely not then. Alright.It did but only the first game from what I can tell, it was also on the Wii U so...
I don't either. In my opinion Crash's chances are heavily overinflated.Why do people think Crash is so likely? All I know is that he's popular, and Crash 4's release date matches the presumed announcement of CP9.
Things are seemingly lining up for them despite this having happened with plenty of characters that were certainly locks but didn't turn out to be the case.Why do people think Crash is so likely? All I know is that he's popular, and Crash 4's release date matches the presumed announcement of CP9.
Basically, don't be surprised if he doesn't get in, especially considering that I don't expect any more Western characters.Things are seemingly lining up for them despite this having happened with plenty of characters that were certainly locks but didn't turn out to be the case.
Reasons for this.
Highly demanded character, 90s video game icon and mascot with legendary rivalry with Mario and Sonic, revival of the franchise with the N. Sane Trilogy, Crash 4 being announced for the Switch, etc.
I honestly don't tbh. If you ask me, folks I'm feeling are overestimating and confident on his chances of getting in and feels like the Sm4sh days all over again regarding King K. Rool who was certain to get in as DLC and the ballot winner but didn't. Seems folks apparently haven't learned...Basically, don't be surprised if he doesn't get in, especially considering that I don't expect any more Western characters.
From what I've gathered on google, the Yokai Watch craze essentially blocked any chance of Skylanders being successful in Japan.I'm still wondering if he could get in though Skylanders. I don't know how big the series is/was over in Japan but I imagine it at least existed.
And thus with a bitter venom from its breath Skylanders cursed Yokai Watch to not catch on in America.From what I've gathered on google, the Yokai Watch craze essentially blocked any chance of Skylanders being successful in Japan.
Speaking of Yo-kai Watch, let's talk about Jibanyan in Smash.From what I've gathered on google, the Yokai Watch craze essentially blocked any chance of Skylanders being successful in Japan.
We’re not wrong because roster decisions are made to be contrarian, it’s just that we suck at predictions.My problem with arguments against Crash and a few others is that they're almost solely based on the premise that everyone predicts them so naturally they won't be of the chosen. That's not how things work. The character picks aren't inherently contradictory to our beliefs, we just don't have enough information to really make any accurate predictions. EDIT: The distinction here being that while we're not normally right, we're also not incapable of being right, even if through sheer dumb luck.
"That doesn't change the fact that there's still a chance that he won't get in."
While that will always be true, it will also always be unhelpful since it's the case with all characters.
Speaking as a Crash fan and supporter since 2017, Crash has simply had a lot going for him since his revival with the N. Sane Trilogy, with only a few possible setbacks. That, and he’s a gaming icon who simply makes perfect since to be in the same game as Mario, Snake, Sonic, Cloud, etc.Why do people think Crash is so likely? All I know is that he's popular, and Crash 4's release date matches the presumed announcement of CP9.
Literally what I said except it didn't leap through a thesaurus...We’re not wrong because roster decisions are made to be contrarian, it’s just that we suck at predictions.
I'd be full of sodium chloride if I had to do that.I feel like that means that I should make an effort to not talk like that one character in kid's cartoons who's personality is science.
Indubitably.I'd be full of sodium chloride if I had to do that.
I mean, people have provided general skepticism toward Crash grounded more in the additional obstacles of western characters and simple reminders that a character being mentioned a lot and being objectively "iconic" doesn't immediately make them likely. Nintendo's connection with Activision not being as strong as most other companies they've collaborated with, Crash's popularity for Smash being a fairly new thing and many of these decisions having foundation from nearly four or five years ago...My problem with arguments against Crash and a few others is that they're almost solely based on the premise that everyone predicts them so naturally they won't be of the chosen.
Now that the full thing is out, I'll give my thoughs on it.The second part of that Top 10 article is now out.
My own thoughts:
I personally don't think #3 should be here as I think he is really overrated in regards to his chances. Everyone else (yes, even #4) I can see happening though.
This post reminds me of something Joe Merrick, the guy behind Serebii, once said involving fake leaks. It's up to the rumours to prove that they're credible, not to skeptists to prove that they're fakes. I say this because I agree that supporters of a character can and should find ways to convince people their characters are worth talking about, it's why I'm usually happy when someone makes a lengthy post to explain to me why their characters would be fun, SKX31 usually managing to make me go "oh damn that DOES sound cool".I mean, people have provided general skepticism toward Crash grounded more in the additional obstacles of western characters and simple reminders that a character being mentioned a lot and being objectively "iconic" doesn't immediately make them likely. Nintendo's connection with Activision not being as strong as some other companies they've collaborated with, Crash's popularity for Smash being a fairly new thing and many of these decisions having foundation from nearly four or five years ago...
Crash is simply a character whose legacy and popularity, particularly over the last few years, has single-handedly made him a frontrunner. That's fine too, it just doesn't put him over the likes of someone like Hayabusa or Monster Hunter in my eyes who have a lot more direct points in their favor than "popular and iconic". And for all we know maybe none of those three will make it, not like I'm trying to say I have any better idea than you do, but like...
It's the responsibility of the one predicting to tell me WHY Crash should be anticipated, not necessarily the responsibility of me or other skeptics to say why he won't. That goes for any character really, because any character can make it, but we've only got three spots left. Crash is a worthy candidate, he's popular and iconic, and that may very well be enough to get him through. But "he's popular and iconic" is pretty much the sole basis for the arguments in his favor, just as "he's too obvious" is in your mind the sole point against him... and "popular and iconic" can apply to any number of characters still absent. There isn't really a lot of of insightful discussion to be had about this character, really. It's very much a wait and see sort of thing.
But I think labeling him as the single most likely character is wrong, personally.
every day im just so, SO glad that alternate timeline in the bolded sentence didn't happen, that we got Sephiroth instead of Fortnite guyNow that the full thing is out, I'll give my thoughs on it.
First of all, why is Doomguy still taken into consideration after he got disconfirmed trough an interview a while ago.
Second, Eggman is both a perfect and terrible fit for this kind of list. He's a terrible because he showscase how this fanbase is unable to do anything but follow bandwagons, leading it to be unable to predict characters 99% of the time, but it's also good because of that exact same reason, making it a good case study as to why the Smash fanbase never learns. Could have also worked pre-Sephiroth if it was Fortnite man instead of Eggman.
Rayman feels like he should be a bit lower since the reasoning for him feels a bit weak compared to the rest of the reasonings, so I'd probably put him at 10 and bump Xenoblade someone to 9 or 8.
Otherwise it's classic stuff, really I have nothing to say on Xenoblade someone, Lloyd, and Monster Hunter, because that's classic stuff with good reasoning in my opinion.
The top 5 surprises me by starting with Sol Badguy who I find to be extremly well rated for the good reasons, so that's a really good job for that one.
And then right after that a disapointment with pokemon being not only on the top 10 but also so high. No, it's not a ocmparable situation to Byleth, thoufh at least kudos for mentioning something else than Sword and Shield in one of the write-ups.
And the top 3 was the expected Dante-Hayabusa-Crash trio we hear about since the begining of FP2. Nothing to say except that no, Crash isn't the most likely character, many characters have as much and also more going for them than Crash does.
Overall, it was an alright top, even if Eggman and Pokemon whoever made my eyes roll a bit. It was well written with the reasoning being good for the most part.
I thought about this too. I think it's insane how Doomguy is one of the few characters who got about as close to a disconfirmation as possible and people talk about him as if that just never happened lmao. I mean, maybe they'll surprise us I dunno. Just jarring to me how people seem to ignore that entirely.First of all, why is Doomguy still taken into consideration after he got disconfirmed trough an interview a while ago.
It was a solid pass! Hayabusa, Amaterasu and Sol(clearing the path for Kunio in the future)? I'd be happy with that!I really did wish Grinch Leak 2.0 was real...I would had been satisfied.
2B, Amaterasu, and Crash making it all up for me.
Dr. Eggman is not a fad. Yes he's only discussed because of Sephiroth, but that's because Sephiroth put him on the table in the first place. Same with Chun-Li. If the notion that 3rd party series can't get more than one full playable character hadn't existed then both characters would have been just as heavily considered long before now.Second, Eggman is both a perfect and terrible fit for this kind of list. He's a terrible because he showscase how this fanbase is unable to do anything but follow bandwagons, leading it to be unable to predict characters 99% of the time, but it's also good because of that exact same reason, making it a good case study as to why the Smash fanbase never learns. Could have also worked pre-Sephiroth if it was Fortnite man instead of Eggman.
I agree with your analysis, but I got to discuss the bolded pointNow that the full thing is out, I'll give my thoughs on it.
First of all, why is Doomguy still taken into consideration after he got disconfirmed trough an interview a while ago.
Second, Eggman is both a perfect and terrible fit for this kind of list. He's a terrible because he showscase how this fanbase is unable to do anything but follow bandwagons, leading it to be unable to predict characters 99% of the time, but it's also good because of that exact same reason, making it a good case study as to why the Smash fanbase never learns. Could have also worked pre-Sephiroth if it was Fortnite man instead of Eggman.
Rayman feels like he should be a bit lower since the reasoning for him feels a bit weak compared to the rest of the reasonings, so I'd probably put him at 10 and bump Xenoblade someone to 9 or 8.
Otherwise it's classic stuff, really I have nothing to say on Xenoblade someone, Lloyd, and Monster Hunter, because that's classic stuff with good reasoning in my opinion.
The top 5 surprises me by starting with Sol Badguy who I find to be extremly well rated for the good reasons, so that's a really good job for that one.
And then right after that a disapointment with pokemon being not only on the top 10 but also so high. No, it's not a ocmparable situation to Byleth, thoufh at least kudos for mentioning something else than Sword and Shield in one of the write-ups.
And the top 3 was the expected Dante-Hayabusa-Crash trio we hear about since the begining of FP2. Nothing to say except that no, Crash isn't the most likely character, many characters have as much and also more going for them than Crash does.
Overall, it was an alright top, even if Eggman and Pokemon whoever made my eyes roll a bit. It was well written with the reasoning being good for the most part.
Honestly, if people feel strongly about the prospect of a Bethesda character they should probably shift their attention toward Dovahkiin. I think he's slept on a little bit, with Skyrim being quite popular in Japan and being one of the definitive games of the last decade.If we're to get another western rep its likely Crash which even then I don't think is happening along with Master Chief (Who I think is being slept on and has potential being the E3 reveal this year). I would even put Rayman over him.
And like Sephiroth & Steve would be a character much more heavily speculated some time ago suddenly surprising people with their inclusion long after.Honestly, if people feel strongly about the prospect of a Bethesda character they should probably shift their attention toward Dovahkiin. I think he's slept on a little bit, with Skyrim being quite popular in Japan and being one of the definitive games of the last decade.
Ah yes him too.Honestly, if people feel strongly about the prospect of a Bethesda character they should probably shift their attention toward Dovahkiin. I think he's slept on a little bit, with Skyrim being quite popular in Japan and being one of the definitive games of the last decade.
I don't really see Master Chief because I don't know if they would double dip and give Microsoft two fighters in this Fighter Pass, as well as 3 total DLC characters.Ah yes him too.
Him and Master Chief I think are being especially slept on for the E3 reveal. I can see either of them or Chun-Li.