1. I am saying that the “reason” we are given for Joker’s inclusion is that Sakurai likes him and Persona 5(despite neither Sakurai nor Nintendo officially stating this as the reason Joker got in)but because we know Nintendo picks the characters that reason is obviously bs and we don’t actually know the reason he is in(which means I could actually be right about Joker being added after the 1st pass was finalized)
2. Sorry, but this is just BS, Sakurai never said that Joker didn’t get one because the format for the presentation didn’t exist yet(and neither did Nintendo), he never even mentions Joker in a Smash presentation outside of the amiibo and other unrelated things. This is just a rumor taken as fact because there is a massive difference between how Joker was advertised and every other character and people need an explanation. As for people thinking SMT V is Persona before they see the title, that is because the name Persona is everywhere now and Joker and his friends’ designs are all over Smash. If the average Nintendo gamer knew SMT is related to Persona via a widely publicized event like a Sakurai Presents then there would be a lot less people doing that and being confused by the trolls saying SMT is a Persona clone.
3. Final Fantasy is not rated by its series, it is rated by its individual title. As an obvious example, Final Fantasy 1 is not rated as an M game in a presentation(check the ads for the Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters if you don’t believe me)because it’s name is the same as the series with a M rated game in it. The reason why I say Xenoblade 2 is closer to a mature rating is because it has a lot more examples of sexually suggestive dialogue and situations and it has designs that have to be censored to get into Smash(in the case of Pyra and Mythra and Pneuma and Brighid), and there are far more ecchi-like designs for blades throughout the game than those that got into Smash.
4. You don’t know why Joker is in Smash because Nintendo has not given you the reason, you have no clue whether I am right or not. I am just saying that I could be wrong about a few specific things that don’t prove or disprove the theory I have that Joker was added last minute because I get carried away with theories sometimes. Joker being added last minute when they are just starting the pass actually makes perfect sense because that means they don’t have much of anything yet created for the other characters. It especially makes sense to throw in someone at the last minute when it is a character as unexpected as Joker to hype up the pass and make a claim that the rest of the pass will be similarly as surprising(which it wasn’t).
5. It’s not arrogant for someone who actually has done their homework to say that they know more than someone who hasn’t. It IS arrogant however for someone to jump into a debate despite not knowing the subject matter or the rules and claim they are as good or better than someone who has honed their arguments over months or even years to be as close as pure facts as possible. Your evidence is literally just factually wrong(like the Final Fantasy M rated thing) and you can’t even address many of the more damning evidence I have against popular picks.
You are deliberately ignoring the fact that pack 11 was not originally a part of pass 2, or the fact that pass 2 was not supposed to exist originally and that one of the characters in pass 2 was supposed to be in pass 1 because the rest of the characters in pass 2 could be added in any future Smash or never added and it makes no difference. The character has to be from a game old enough to be in pass 1 but was delayed to pass 2’s timeframe, it’s not Metroid Dread(the concept for Dread has obviously existed forever but this was when Metroid Samus Returns was still relevant and it is entirely possible that they didn’t ask MercurySteam to make Dread yet) and while Pokemon could fit that criteria(but probably doesn’t), the spirits deconfirm it.
Lastly, EMMI DOESN’T make more sense than Nahobino because EMMI isn’t a character, it is a generic robot model type programmed by the federation to hunt down the remnants of the X parasite(which Samus has because of the events of Fusion) and destroy it, it doesn’t have its own personality and there are confirmed to be multiple copies of EMMI in Dread. The most you can hope for EMMI is a boss battle in a future Smash, and the fact that the EMMI are designed to be indestructible kind of makes even that inclusion unlikely. A BOTW character does fit the time frame for being considered for pass 1(and we do know Sakurai wanted to do BOTW Zelda but gave up on that idea)and could conceivably be in pass 2, but BOTW is a delayed Wii U game that came out in 2017 and BOTW2 isn’t even fully confirmed for a 2022 release date, there is absolutely no reason to wait this long to
put in a character from that game, and there is the fact that it has spirits(and so does Skyward Sword btw). Gen 8 Pokémon again has spirits, Gen 4 Pokémon has spirits and a fighter etc. Nahobino by far makes the most sense out of any of the characters from upcoming games on Switch because SMT has no content in Smash, even Advance Wars has Smash content.
We can believe that anyone can get in all we want but all that does is set us up for disappointment. Nintendo is clearly following a pattern with the dlc inclusions for Smash Ultimate.
1. We were never given that as a reason, you're just making stuff up to fit your weird theory. We've been told Nintendo Picks the dlc, Sakurai liking Persona 5 wasn't mentioned as a reason.
2. Yup, Sakurai never said that, because it literally didn't exist. For Hero's presentation he said they initially planned for more Fighters to have the same style of presentation as Joker, but they cost more money, and doing a Sakurai Presents is more cost effective. Once again, there isn't a weird conspiracy. And of course Joker and Persona are more well known thanks to stuff like Smash, but Persona is also infinitely more marketable than SMT, thanks to its style and gameplay.
3. That doesn't change the fact that Sephiroth's presentation is the only one to be age restricted. And the only games in that presentation were Final Fantasy, Final Fantasy VII, Final Fantasy VII Remake and Super Mario RPG.
4. You're right, I don't know if you're right or not. But I still think it's unlikely Joker was added in late, because that just seems disorganised and incompetent of Nintendo.
5. You're saying that like I don't know what I'm talking about, even though I have actual evidence for what I'm saying. Also, this is all just for fun really, just because I haven't dedicated my life to proving my crackpot theory doesn't make me any less "qualified" to talk about stuff on here. I never said I was better than you, but complaining about my evidence being wrong (and giving an example of something that I said was nothing more than an educated guess) is really hypocritical considering some of what you've talked about is flat out wrong. Speaking of which:
You are deliberately ignoring the fact that pack 11 was not originally a part of pass 2, or the fact that pass 2 was not supposed to exist originally and that one of the characters in pass 2 was supposed to be in pass 1 because the rest of the characters in pass 2 could be added in any future Smash or never added and it makes no difference. The character has to be from a game old enough to be in pass 1 but was delayed to pass 2’s timeframe, it’s not Metroid Dread(the concept for Dread has obviously existed forever but this was when Metroid Samus Returns was still relevant and it is entirely possible that they didn’t ask MercurySteam to make Dread yet) and while Pokemon could fit that criteria(but probably doesn’t), the spirits deconfirm it.
This is all just made up as far as I can tell. Nobody said the final pack wasn't originally meant to be there, they said they initially only planned to do 1 or 2 extra characters, which is completely different. Pass 2 wasn't initially planned, but them making another pack was probably just because it made sense. The base game and first pass sold really well, so it made perfect sense to make more dlc no matter what characters are included.
And nobody said the final character was supposed to be in pass 1, why do you even think that? You've just made that up to fit your theory.
And saying the EMMI not having a personality is probably not the best argument considering Nahobino is a literal blank slate for you to project your morals onto. Besides, we have Steve, so that doesn't matter much. It being indestructible is a slightly bigger problem, but they don't always perfectly represent a character, especially when it comes to Metroid. Literally none of those characters function how they do in the original games.
ARMS got a character and was released in 2017, BOTW could still easily work, especially with Age of Calamity and BOTW 2.
Finally, you implied that I want all the characters I mentioned, but... I'd much rather have Nahobino than any of them. I actively don't want another Pokemon, but I know that it's more likely. I'm more active on the SMT support thread than here most of the time, but I can see why an SMT rep might not happen.
Acting like you know what Nintendo chose and why, and acting like your theory has no problems and is 100% factual is both stupid and arrogant. You seem annoyed when people argue with you on a
discussion thread, when that's the entire point.
I can't tell if this is bait or not, but if it is, it isn't very good, because nobody's annoyed, you just make yourself look ignorant.