This game has way too many scum in it.
Gheb I'm glad that you decided to stay but stop playing that advice dog. It's seriously like your most stereotypical scum tell. Your 843 is about 70% advice dog and 30% making general observations. Elaborating on how much town is in a tough spot, while true, doesn't really come off as you trying to be genuinely helpful.
Also 874 is somewhat like this. I wouldn't have a problem with this type of post Gheb if it wasn't for the fact that all of your post so far toDay seemed like this.
881 to. "Lynching Soup scum toDay would mean a lot though . . . " gee thanks for informing us of that.
950-953 are slightly better but still ring somewhat like your playing the "observer."
@848: Because I was being attacked? Generally people defend themselves after being attack.
Soup, idk if you're accusing my of this because you're scum, but if this is seriously something that you would of used as town, don't. Something I've learned is that someone becoming "overly defensive" is not really a scumtell. People will OBVIOUSLY become defensive after being accused of something, it's the people who would act calm under pressure that I would be a little bit more worried about.
@850: Krys I'm not impressed by your play this game. You started off alright, but the more that we have gone down the road, the more your posts have started to look like Shadow Moth version 1.2. Your 850 is a prime example of this. You literally just realigned your reads with what's popular. "I don't think Gheb is scum anymore (after people started being okay with Gheb living)," "Indy Swords looks interesting to me (non-committal approach to something two others have subscribed to [plus what's interesting about it? Soup had only said one thing towards the subject at this point]),"I'll be okay with John if nothing else comes up (I agree with you on John, however he's still super easy at this point and even this is non-committal)."
Actually Krys I would argue that your 850 is worse than Moth's play in general, because at least Moth was antagonistic (something that's not safe for scum to be).
Btw @J's 852: The whole "case or gtfo" thing was not only because I wanted to see your case on me, but was also a take on the "**** or gtfo" thing. Not sure if you got that or not.
@856: Ugh, no Inferno. Not everyone this game can be scum. You will come with me if you want to live (yes this is a dated reference, deal with it yo).
Macman you're being somewhat hypocritical, but you're right about John's 870. So why did you take your vote off of him in your 873?
@880: Yeah but it's quite clear that you were implying that you thought that Macman was scum. Why call him out on fluff otherwise?
Lol Soup, I'm feel slightly douchy for saying this but you look like you typed your 886 with your nose.
@931: An Inferno/Soup team seems possible with the way Soup attacked Inferno, but I'm not quite sure that it makes sense from Inferno's PoV.
Like I'm reading Inferno toDay and I'm not sure if things could really be this obvious. Seems much more dumb townie if you ask me.
@945: While this post is true J, I feel like it's a shallow observation overall. Why isn't Inferno just dumb town to you? Do you really feel like Inferno would just try to blatantly discredit Rake's claim for his scum buddy?
Soup I honestly don't think that you've started to try to get Clover lynched at this point, but good luck with that.
Funny thing is is that I actually agree with Soup's 954 that J's jump sucked. It does strike me as a bit odd that J didn't question the claim more, since it's inherently just a questionable and weird claim.
That's all for now. I will try to reread sometime this week but I have finals coming up so no promises.