I'm curious why, as Tom and Rockin are your top picks I assume. Does this mean Lore jumps that list? If so, why?
Technically FF is my top, but I've kinda ceded that that lynch was going to happen. at the beginning of the day it looked split between those two, but there hasn't been traction. Perhaps I ceded too easily. mia culpa.
Realistically, all the lynches on the table are inactive lynches, save for Lore.
This is such a crummy situation, I hate it.
Essentially, I've been trying to look at this different, as I said earlier, it's easy for me to give people the benefit of the doubt (and have a STARTING point of viewing every interaction as TvT), which I have clearly forgotten can be poison in this game.
With that in mind, it's kinda stuck on me that Kary said I'm giving lore the benefit of the doubt and it's unwarranted. thinking more on that makes it easier to see Lore's actions as scummy.
I also wrestle with :
I DO believe that a Lore lynch teaches the town most. Is that enough justification for a lynch?
as stated earlier, inactives may be good lynch candidates; self policing and all that, but what Ryker also says is true, that we can REALLY quick wind up in a bad situation. All it takes is one mafia that's semi good at blending in.
It's really back and forth. And honestly with the inactives, we aren't necessarily adding new information, we're just going over the same stuff, which causes problems as well.