Are you basing this off argument he had with RDK? I mean, I can see that the guy is either pretty religious or really likes to play Devil's advocate, but I wouldn't put him on the same level as Bob Saget and Hooblah. At least he has some good points. =/I will say this about GOD!: The amount of shi! that comes from his mouth in some recent debates is so appalling, that if we were to let him in, we might as well let BOB SAGET & Hooblah in with all due respect.
True.Just because you argue with persistence doesn't mean you argue and/or debate well.
Based upon your perspective, which is more logic based, thus giving you bias towards one debate style instead of another. Of course, I'm also biased cuz I want another LordoftheMorning type in here. xD It depends upon who's reading the debate.Just because you think "empirically and faith" based doesn't mean you argue/debate well.
Just because you're thinking differently doesn't mean you're thinking is wrong.Just because you think differently than other people doesn't mean you argue/debate well.
Just because he argues for ID doesn't mean he's an empty-headed Christian with no idea of how logic works. Although, arguing for ID in a place filled with liberals is both really stupid and really gutsy, lol. More the former than the latter IMO.
Meh, diff opinions on how well he debates. I wouldn't rank him as THAT low. =/In his case, he can't debate worth a shi!.
He gives empirical evidence from his own experiences... however much that counts for,And with his posts, evidence and him won't be meeting up anytime soon.