What I don't get is, why is Captain Falcon's placement on the SBR Tier List a reason to believe MK should be banned? Or rather, why is it anything to get annoyed about in general?
It not just falcons placement. Its every ones.
What is a tier list? In the case of the one we're looking at, it's just ranking characters based on the opinion or opinions of one or several individuals. If we agree with it, okay, if we don't, we don't. It's just opinion. So why is this such a huge deal to us that Falcon's bottom once again? The reasons for the rankings might be misguided and might give a false impression as to Falcon's potential, or they might be influenced by some form of bias based on another character, but does it matter? It's once again just a group's end conclusions being voiced in a simplified, general manner.
I honestly don't care if falcon goes up or not. Im focused on banning MK. That way the curve is a bit more balanced. If MK is banned, more lower-tier characters will show up. WIth MK there is no balance.
I don't care who the individuals are or the influence it has on the board, really. I just think we worry about tiers a bit too much or whether or not Falcon's a "good" character when we could be focusing on improving our game in general.
We have been. Look at the date i made this thread. It was when the boards were alive with discoveries.
Also: Not sure if this has been gone over, skimmed through the thread a bit, but just because MK got 15.00/15.00 doesn't mean he's perfect. It just means he's considered to be the best character by everyone from the SBR who voted.
I know. I never made the edit.