Man you really don't get it dude. Your vote was on IR, a beautiful place to have your vote. And because of one post that I didn't even find very attractive, you're gonna mozy off of his wagon? That is terribad logic, I can't see a townie doing that, just because it's so... UGH IT WAS ONE POST.
I still can't get over it. Still can't.
Let's see. The 'terribad logic' that labels me as scum is, so far as I can tell, 'I didn't like the post that got him off the wagon' and 'he unvoted my biggest scumpick, HE MUST DIE'. What the hell is this? It's not logic, it's you not liking a post I liked. Sure, you can be suspicious of me getting off the wagon, it's something you can legitimately be suspicious about, but pick a more valid angle, you lazy toaster.
Two reasons is that he is literally tripping over his crossed up reads on IR, and the fact that he's too scared to really slap his vote on anybody or call them scum. I'll most likely find more shiz through the thread, just let time tell.
My vote is on IR. I haven't tripped on anything, IR went from scum > mildly scummy with that 'terribad post', where he now sits with Asdioh. You'll most likely find stuff like that because you're keen to twist anything I say into scummy stuff.
If you couldn't tell from this beautifully constructed post, WL is an artist.
Pointless buddying. Analyse the damn post and you'll see it is merely 'scumpick for these reasons x2', 'These guys are pushing me as scum', 'outroad to vote IR/Asd if these two get better'. It is notable that WL laughs off Soup's Gord scumread. It is also notable WL assumes I think he is scum when he is prominent at the top of my town list, which somebody should have picked up on if they analysed. The only thing that I've done to cast even slight suspicion on WL is throwing out that Asd/WL scumteam theory, which I have said is not to be taken seriously and based on the interactions between them, not WL's individual posts (as he is keen to have us believe is the only way to show scum). Soup has defended himself against WL's logic, which he seems to take as calling him scum. Overly defensive much?
It is not. You have done ****-all in the way of analysis and asked > followed up on maybe one question before joining WL in his mighty crusade of EVERYBODY I DON'T LIKE IS SCUM WITHOUT FAIL. The only thing that qualifies as taking a real stance is against me and Soup.
If you're sold on me being scum and refuse to actually analyse posts, of course I ****ing look bad, you'll just be taking everything I post with several grains of scummy salt to begin with.
And now I'm 100% sold on Soup scum. I mean come on man if you're gonna be scum at least be consistent. I mean really.
That was on the top of your list. But ya haven't seen AA as town! Ya know, that's just how ya feel! But not seen em as town!
Understandable. At least these bits aren't 'this is wrong' and nothing else.
Everything else that has happened, in my head, was me agreeing with WL and Soup just getting moar mad and moar madder. Umad cuz uscum bro?
Herp-a-****ing derp, he comes clean. You haven't analysed much and are just agreeing with WL. Soup got annoyed because WL thinking that he was calling scum and doing a strawman when he was in fact just trying to get WL off his back. While Soup's case itself wasn't overly well presented, if you misinterpret it like that of course it's a strawman.
Oh except for WL's vote on Soup. Bro you gotta get off of him. An AA lynch is much more useful for us. Especially since this town doesn't seem to latch on to Soup scum. But they can see the AA's scum better. C'mon bro.
Let's lynch AA.
How is it more useful? I'm not scum and I've taken weaker stances than Soup. If your master WL is to be believed (you agree with him, as you have stated), I've parroted so much that any reads of mine can be written off as those of others. Nice try, street rat.
If you claim that you're a mason with WL I'll take what you say more seriously - that is, pretend WL speaks for both of you since that's the bulk of your argument anyway.
@aa: though you said you would be okay with either a Gova or a Asd lynch, did you ever express interest in actually going Gova first?
See here.
I'm not pushing a Gova lynch. I never pushed a Gova lynch. There is no point at which I suggested Gova should be lynched over anyone else. Mentioning that 'I would be fine with his lynch' was intended as passive.
Yeah...no. I don't want to lynch him, I never actively pushed his lynch. Been passive about it since forever. Right now I want to lynch IR anyway, not Asdioh. Past that, I wanted him to show he had a reason to maintain his vote on Asdioh and wasn't just keeping his vote there because the cool kids were doing it, or something like that.
Soup's notes said:
In turn, these little sections i got from aa don't sit well with me, and after re-reading i had aa as town, so this conflicts with it and i had to decide whether this interaction is less important then my re-read, and i took that it is. there's some bad things here, the changes from "gova and asdioh" and then to "IR and asdioh", especially AFTER he said he liked his rebuttal post and said he was off the hook.
I remember specifically saying that he was not in the clear, merely less scummy. I suppose my unvote would give you that impression, so I'm not blaming you for that. Gova and Asdioh at that point were
also lynches I was ok with, does that not imply I was still ok with an IR lynch? Additionally, Gova went back to null with the next little exchange, so of course it resets to my two 'scumpicks'.
so in turn, i understand where gord is coming from, i just feel it's the wrong position to come into, i would prefer if gord gave me a re-read on aa and tell me what he thinks besides what has happened right now, then see.
Gord will just be thinking 'how can I twist this out as scum' rather than actually analysing, you won't be getting much from it aside from 'lol aa is scum because WL said so in these ways and also ima quote this one bit WL missed and say that this is hella scummy'.
I also noted that Asdioh said in his 343 that Gord was 'doing stuff', when in fact he had, to that point, done ****-all. I'm not reaching enough to draw a connection from that though.