Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
But we've seen the method of which both ROBs could be gotten.
ROB is logically, deconfirmed, using the information retreived from the DOJO, which supersedes any other "leak."
Then why didn't they add the Random button so that the Mock Up would look like the real thing? I know it's fake, I don't even care about the characters they picked. I'm just saying that if they really were aiming for the best look, including the Random button that's been in all Brawl line-ups would have made it look better.^ Cos It's Just A Mock Up Designed To Show You What The Roster Would Look Like. ^
Are you serious? That's not the purpose of the mock-up... It's not meant to look good, it's supposed to reflect the information that multiple 'leakers' have given us in the past weeks. Those leakers have yet to be disproved.Then why didn't they add the Random button so that the Mock Up would look like the real thing? I know it's fake, I don't even care about the characters they picked. I'm just saying that if they really were aiming for the best look, including the Random button that's been in all Brawl line-ups would have made it look better.
Because we didn't know it was fake when the first blurry screen was revealed moments before we all creamed ourselves, until the people at 2chan made it obvious by spamming the image turned at a ninety degree angle.Then why didn't they add the Random button so that the Mock Up would look like the real thing? I know it's fake, I don't even care about the characters they picked. I'm just saying that if they really were aiming for the best look, including the Random button that's been in all Brawl line-ups would have made it look better.
My issues with this roster set-up are simply political and numerical:
Political:
- Female Cast increase: ZERO
- Icon 19: Not covered.
Numerical:
- Mario Represetation: -1
- Star Fox Representation: +2
Why DECREASE the flagship series represetitive cast by one when there are two ready and willing reps to add to the roster (Geno and Bowser Jr.).
Why give a low game count series such as Star Fox 2 new reps, bring back a clone rep, not give them a female rep, not give them a rep that could bring a unique gameplay style, and leave Metroid at 1 rep in the dregs like F-Zero.
Why give two similar reps to Mother series (one of the LOWEST gamecount series) then not further increase the rep set for high game count series such as Fire Emblem.
Why ignore four of the higher voted characters on the list (Krystal, Ridley, Geno, Takamaru) after setting up so much hope bringing in the high count characters (Dedede, Diddy, Ike, Olimar, WW Link).
A fair count of these are poor fan caring choices, not outright impossible, just seeming to be REALLY stupid. R.O.B. is just rightly the straw on the camel here...
Quoted for truth.NES R.O.B. is as out there as Game & Watch. Theyre not meant to be popular demanded characters, they are meant to be tributes to Nintendo's root successes in gaming. So dont use his obscurity or the foolish moveset argument against him.
Now, the Starfox character R.O.B.64 is truly such a minor character from a franchise that isnt worthy to get as many characters as Mario, Zelda, and Pokemon. No one should believe that the R.O.B. on the 35 roster is from Starfox...
So barring the ROB64 arguement:Quoted for truth.
I REPEAT PEOPLE. R.O.B. is almost definitley NOT from Starfox. Therefore the "no 19th icon" argument is dead.
Believe me, I don't like it either, but it doesn't have to make sense to you or me. It made sense to the developers, so it is what it is..There is no representation rule. It's just how we fans try to predict who's going to be in the game.So barring the ROB64 arguement:
We give Mother (a series with 3 original releases and 1 remake release to its name) two reps, and Metroid (8 releases, 2 rereleases) 1 rep. Star Fox gets 3 strikingly similar reps, ignoring its one shot at a unique rep. We decrease the count of Mario reps by 1. Fire Emblem (10 unique releases) gets no new reps. And we make room for R.O.B. as a WTF character (when I think Olimar is more than enough WTF, and ROB pales in compare to Game&Watch, the second coming of WTF).
How does any of that make sense, at all.
It's sad when the fans can come up with better stuff then the developers who are being paid to come up with stuff.Believe me, I don't like it either, but it doesn't have to make sense to you or me. It made sense to the developers, so it is what it is..There is no representation rule. It's just how we fans try to predict who's going to be in the game.
But that's what makes this list unbelievable. Sakurai has been listening to the fans again, they set up a proper decorum for sending in ideas. Including Wolf over Krystal makes no sense. Including R.O.B. over Ridley makes no sense. While the list isn't foolproof, its illogical to say that a character with at least 3-4 good ideas will be tossed to the side for the Smash Bros equal to Waddle Dee (R.O.B.).Believe me, I don't like it either, but it doesn't have to make sense to you or me. It made sense to the developers, so it is what it is..There is no representation rule. It's just how we fans try to predict who's going to be in the game.
Yes, yes, I agree.Real or not, this is what I think of this darned roster:
If it's fake: Lulz@ the attention whores.
If it's real: I hope Nintendo sues NeoGAF for leaking info.
The only thing I desire in the roster is the character I'm hoping for. Sakurai could add a frackin' octorok and make the game 30 characters and I wouldn't think of it as a big deal.Yes, yes, I agree.
(In a sick sort of way, though; after all, if this leak should prove accurate, it would technically be what we had been desiring for oh-so long--a legitimate leak. It just might happen, however, that what was leaked was highly undesirable in and of itself.)
Call me selfish if you want to, but even if I did like the roster they're still doing something illegal.Yeah, let's hope they get sued because we don't like the roster they gave us.
Indeed. The smash bros swan song, perhaps the last one Sakurai will ever make. 100 people working on it full time (lots of man hours). 700 people involved. And you're telling me they catered to the fan suggestions just about as much as Melee? That they already expended all the surprises? That they bumped up the roster by 10? Despite twice the development time?Yes, yes, I agree.
(In a sick sort of way, though; after all, if this leak should prove accurate, it would technically be what we had been desiring for oh-so long--a legitimate leak. It just might happen, however, that what was leaked was highly undesirable in and of itself.)
Here's the thing, man. You know why I think this roster would be a fantastic roster for Brawl? For the very same reason you hate it: it doesn't bend over for the fans. I said this over at IGN a long time ago, but now it deserves to be said here. Now, to be clear, this post was made in response to one of those little dweebish bum-****s getting on my case after I'd expressed my disappointment at the Sonic reveal:But that's what makes this list unbelievable. Sakurai has been listening to the fans again, they set up a proper decorum for sending in ideas. Including Wolf over Krystal makes no sense. Including R.O.B. over Ridley makes no sense. While the list isn't foolproof, its illogical to say that a character with at least 3-4 good ideas will be tossed to the side for the Smash Bros equal to Waddle Dee (R.O.B.).
Also, there's is a Representation rule, its called NOT TICKING OFF YOUR AUDIENCE! The golden rule of making anything for the public to read/watch/play/enjoy is that if the public won't enjoy it, its a bad idea. I could understand R.O.B. getting in if with a 40-44 cast, maybe even a 38 cast. However putting R.O.B. in while there's all this papertrail of what Sakurai was looking at, and four good ideas for Ridley, three for Krystal... and ignoring them, will look bad.
I mean, do you think the Mario fans would be happy if the Mario cast in Brawl was suddenly Mario, Peach, Bowser. And at the same time Waddle Dee and BioSpark made it playable for Kirby's team? Or instead of adding to the Star Fox reps putting in another Earthbound rep? Tickin' off the fans can kill a game series.
The series has an uneven distribution of popularity and recognition geographically. At least I think that is the rationale here.So barring the ROB64 arguement:
We give Mother (a series with 3 original releases and 1 remake release to its name) two reps,
Actually; two movesets - Samus and Zamusand Metroid (8 releases, 2 rereleases) 1 rep.
Actually, Wolf does not have a history of fighting, and while this speaks against him and in favor of Krystal, consider the notion that he is the only villain that, unlike Andross, fits in combat. He could get something all-new, with any kind of weaponry and fighting style, despite his similiraties to Fox. The same goes for Falco.Star Fox gets 3 strikingly similar reps, ignoring its one shot at a unique rep.
Dr. Mario is a clone. Does he really count in these considerations?We decrease the count of Mario reps by 1.
Once again, the popularity factor could explain things. Also, a leaker on GFaqs who predicted Mushroomy Kingdom to a tee says a few other things that fit with the 35-roster, save for the fact that it adds Dark Samus and Micaiah to it.Fire Emblem (10 unique releases) gets no new reps.
I think that has less to do with WTF and more to do with Retro. Olimar is not nearly as WTF as G&W or R.O.B.And we make room for R.O.B. as a WTF character (when I think Olimar is more than enough WTF, and ROB pales in compare to Game&Watch, the second coming of WTF).
That's the horrible thing with this rumor - everything tangible, concrete and logical (leakers overlapping, leakers having official info before the Dojo confirms, leakers having credible histories, PoR's list creating columns) speaks for it and EVERYTHING ELSE speaks against it! It is supported by everything empirical yet is completely counter-intuitive!How does any of that make sense, at all.
If Smash Bros. Brawl is a failure in any way, then you are right and giving the fans what they want is dangerous to the industry."I think all of you are spoiled little brats who don't know a god**** thing about what game development has been, should be, or how absolutely pathetic it is currently. Never have I been this disgusted to be a gamer. Never have I seen such sloppy disregard and outright disrespect for developer/fan balance. If there's a crystallized example of that, it's the development of Smash Bros Brawl, because it's fan-service in its most blatant form. And it's PATHETIC. Quite frankly, I'm sick of it. And no, I don't believe that gamers should be at the whim and mercy of developers, nor do I believe that game development should take place in a vacuum. But at the same time, giving mass ******* this much influence and control is dangerous and sets a precedent that will damage the industry if left unchecked.
What ARE the ramifications?Nobody agrees with me, I know. I don't really care who agrees or disagrees, because I see the trend starting and I don't want it to get worse. But since you all are still so giddy about getting everything you want, none of you are considering the ramifications, so what do I care?"
I think what you fail to realize is that if Sakurai had all the time and money and manpower he wanted to make this game, the roster would be enormous, and please almost every fan.Nobody agrees with me, I know. I don't really care who agrees or disagrees, because I see the trend starting and I don't want it to get worse. But since you all are still so giddy about getting everything you want, none of you are considering the ramifications, so what do I care?"
Moveset =/= Rep.Actually; two movesets - Samus and Zamus
Who gives a **** about rep? A MOVESET IS A MOVESET.
QF MotherFing T!Who gives a **** about rep? A MOVESET IS A MOVESET.