Desruprot
Smash Lord
Why is the R.O.B being such a big deal I did not think that a playable version of it would be in...I think ROB64 will simply be a trophy
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
lol. very true. watch Wolf be an AT tomorrow.This sure is a funny read, no matter how this turns out.
Uh..can I safely say that krystal and ridley won't be in the game
It just seems odd for both of them to lie though, especially since a NeoGAF mod is backing them up... on top of all this, they are pretty established GAF members who have had previous leak success behind them and are more than likely going to lose their accounts if they are actually telling lies. Not that being banned from a forum would end the world, but it's still sucky since they are established people there and everything.ROB was deconfirmed on both accounts! It's simple common sense people. Markman & Reno are lying!
I'm way late on this, but you do realize that this isn't Melee, right?Ban Heim, when you beat Classic in Melee, you got a CHANCE to unlock Jigglypuff. Maybe they didn't win that match.
please read this:ROB was deconfirmed on both accounts! It's simple common sense people. Markman & Reno are lying!
People are in denial.please read this:
http://smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=3775769&postcount=2457
and tell me if you still think they are lying
Also, please ask yourself if ROB is really somehow deconfirmed based on anything besides conjecture
R.O.B. would fit into the Icon Theory though. And for mobility, look how G&W looks when he runs. Bowser has that weird running animation. Also, R.O.B. has boosters so he'll probably use them to "run" and for jumps. Maybe he fires lasers for a B attack. I don't know.Shortfuse? I'm not going to be insulting. If R.O.B. is in, we've got egg on our face, but the robot has no maneuverability to speak of, so it can't perform all the things that Smashers can do. Its only role in the game is serving the Ancient Minister. If Sakurai comes up with a new model of R.O.B. then I'll gladly eat humble pie. This is speculation on my part.
So it's just a coincidence, then, that only Kirby's picture is different, while every other pic is the exact same as from Whobby/other official screens, despite the fact that the only instance of Kirby's picture is almost completely obscured by the character marker and could have easily been overlooked by the hoaxer? And it's not just the foot; his whole body is cut off in the leaked pic, while you can see at least the rightmost edge of his body in the Whobby pic.I'm going to address 3 different things that have been brought up in the last couple of quotes, but I cannot quote at the moment for some reason:
1. Kirby's foot showing up. This can easily be explained, as the icons from this new screen shot of the supposed starting roster has square boxes, whereas the boxes from Whobby were obviously rectangular. There is no reason the developers couldn't simply change the shape of the boxes.
We've discussed this before. Sakurai says:It's the lack of an Animal Crossing character that nearly debunks this list:
The stickers update about equipping stickers to characters (the update that confirmed Ness, Lucario, and Jigglypuff in a way) has this picture of an Animal Crossing sticker. The few instances where we see that sticker use is limited to specific characters in some cases (The Groudon sticker, the Mother sticker, and two Sonic stickers) all seem to imply that if there is a character restriction, it's from the series the sticker is based on. We've also seen that for a sticker with no character restriction, there is no text or picture in the right column at all. However, in that Animal Crossing sticker screenshot, we see that first half of the same Kanji that's in the other character-specific stickers. It's not a confirmation, but a huge implication that an Animal Crossing character is in the game.
Wait, when has an Animal Crosser used used magic? What's the point of powering up something the supposed character doesn't have? I say this sticker just powers up characters like Zelda...It's the lack of an Animal Crossing character that nearly debunks this list:
Huh? Those are horrible examples! Did Sakurai develop Marvel: Ultimate Alliance? No, this is Smash Bros.! The fact of the matter is, in the Smash series, characters that have been confirmed to be generic enemies do not become playable. That is a true observation, based on the facts at hand.R.O.B. won't be a playable character because he's an SSE enemy.
False. There are plenty of games where you can play as characters that are enemies or minor characters by unlocking them. For example: Some Star Wars Games (as Sith or Storm Trooper) Devil May Cry 3, Viewtiful Joe, Marvel: Ultimate Alliance. There are also games were you can unlock and play as a minor NPC.
And adding Geno or Bowser Jr. would be a SMART business decision? Why would Nintendo go through the hassle of securing the right to use Geno when he would only appeal to super-hardcore gamers? They'd probably need to pay Square-Enix. And Geno or Bowser Jr. is not essential to the Mario franchise or Mario lore.There's one thing that debunks this roster in my eyes: Mario reps.
Not only does the list have only four Mario reps, but that ties it with Zelda, Pokemon, and possibly Starfox. Also, that's less Mario reps than Melee. The Mario series is the best selling game series in the world, and so the roster would obviously reflect that. Simply put, Mario sells. To have only four characters isn't a very smart business decision. Heck, the entire 35 character roster would be a bad business move. Face it, nobody buys this game for its gameplay or adventure mode. We do, but nobody else. People buy this game initially because their favorite characters are in it. That's why they've included Sonic; He sells. The Mario series practically REQUIRES more characters, because then it will sell more. Same with Pokemon, as it's the second best-selling series on the planet.
And you think that R.O.B. doesn't only appeal to the super-hardcore gamers? :|And adding Geno or Bowser Jr. would be a SMART business decision? Why would Nintendo go through the hassle of securing the right to use Geno when he would only appeal to super-hardcore gamers? They'd probably need to pay Square-Enix. And Geno or Bowser Jr. is not essential to the Mario franchise or Mario lore.
This whole "Nintendo should add this or that character for the sake of adding characters from this or that franchise" line of reasoning doesn't make any sense. Say what you will about the 35 character roster, but each character on the roster is essential to its respective franchise.
I'm not sure he appeals to anybody.And you think that R.O.B. doesn't only appeal to the super-hardcore gamers? :|
http://genohatessquareitcontrolshislife.ytmnd.com/As far as i know about Geno, Nintend ocan do whatever the hell they whant with him as long as they put Geno is property of this and that and that, not that i care, if Geno is in or not. If geno is in, good, if not, well whatever.
God...that music is freaky... What's it from? But yeah.http://genohatessquareitcontrolshislife.ytmnd.com/
Geno's copyright is owned by Square Enix. Although Nintendo got away with using him for a bit reference in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga, making him a playable character in Brawl would be something of a selling point; and Square would want Nintendo to pony up cash. Nintendo is nothing if not economical, and I just don't see them making a deal.
But I could be wrong. Really, who knows what the deal would entail? Nintendo might be working with Square on Mario RPG 2 right now, for all we know.