The Corrin agenda comment was a joke tbf. I posted the pre-local results because it was fairly stacked and top heavy so I thought the pre-local would be interesting to discuss.
You're fine, I got that you were joking.
I'm venting general frustration, since it just feels impossible to have a conversation on Corrin anywhere. Half the smash servers I'm in are talking about Corrin, it's on twitter, etc. And the consistent theme is that people are only talking about the most cherrypicked positive aspects of the character, from results to theory.
Even if you try to talk about bad matchups, someone will cite a top Corrin's opinion and choose the opinion most favorable to the character as counter, without a shred of matchup detail. It's a quagmire of uncontestable confirmation bias.
I mean, let me put it another way.
Here's just a
slice of the positive sentiment I'm seeing:
- Corrin clearly beats characters like Ness, Mario, Kazuya, etc. No one is arguing that.
- Neo and SHADIC have common winning MUs like Lucina so we'll give them most of those.
- Leo recently claimed (some tier list video that got sent to me and timestamped on Discord, it's probably on the Luminosity channel) that Corrin does well vs. ZSS, Snake, Palutena, ROB, and Fox, and possibly beats Diddy.
- Even though some of those have been seen as harder MUs for Corrin, it's pretty clear that meta developments are pushing them in the other direction -- even ApolloKage had the matchup with Snake listed as even. So if you take only positive sentiment into account, you also have all those from Leo to fall back on.
- Common perception says that she does well against Sonic, Game and Watch, Steve, and Min Min (I disagree on almost all of these, but let's leave my disagreement aside; we're focusing on positive sentiment).
- Then you have the meta evidence -- Corrin's hardest MUs are supposed to be Samus and Roy, but SHADIC has made those look pretty free for Corrin with a little consistency in advantage, beating Yaura and Kola (Kola so hard that he looked lost), so in the current meta they're sitting closer to even.
- And then I'm hearing you guys say that Corrin beats Wario.
If you take all that and a few other options I've seen, and aggregate it all into a single list showing only the highlights, you get a matchup chart that would probably look something like this (not exact at all, just threw it together in 30 seconds):
...which is absolutely a top 3 matchup chart.
That is what's bugging me. The Corrin hype base is talking about Corrin as though she is in the Sonic/Steve tier of game characters and then placing her in only high tier. The discourse is extremely inconsistent with the perception, and trying to cut through it to arrive at some kind of competitive truth feels like punching through Steve stone blocks with Mario.
Even if you ignore most of the positive matchups and most of Leo's opinion, a character who is even or better vs. all of Game and Watch, Steve, Sonic, Snake, and ROB, and beats Wario/Min Min/Kazuya is probably not "top 20," but closer to top 5.
It's true that sometimes, a character can be good against top tiers but struggle against random mid tiers. The poster monkey for this is usually Diddy Kong. But Diddy Kong is a very different kind of character from Corrin! He has a specific tool (transcendent banana) that makes him strong against some great characters (swords, Min Min) but that works less well against random wonky zoners, whom he struggles to beat (Pacman, DHD).
Corrin, on the other hand, doesn't have very niche tools like that; she is a generic sword user with strong whiff punishing thanks to pin.
In addition, the 5-8 characters we're talking about that she theoretically does well against are so
universally strong and versatile, with unique kits, that it's impossible to do well vs. all of them unless your general level of power is just very high. Falco does pretty well vs. Steve and ROB, for instance, but folds vs. Sonic. For an example of a far more versatile character, Fox does great vs. Sonic and Snake but folds to Game and Watch.
If Corrin is so strong that she's among the best picks against that diverse group of strong characters, then she's definitely not losing to Palutena or Fox or Roy, let alone someone like Belmont, are people serious with that claim? I can't believe that a character with the strength to overcome blocks, Fire!, spindash, grenade, and gyro
that consistently could lose to cookie-cutter characters with generic power profiles.
Either Corrin does incredibly well vs. the top 5 characters and has all these incredible matchups and results and is clearly in top 5 contention, OR there are some things that the current theory is missing and she's actually lower and has more losing matchups than is discussed.
I'm not even saying that it's impossible for Corrin to be top 5 -- in fact, as someone who values bold takes, I might buy it, if you spun up that argument and focused on what she still isn't doing that could be done. I'm just annoyed by the way people are talking about it, with a total lack of nuance, and that the viewpoint is incongruous with itself.
"yeah Corrin beats/goes even with all these characters, including the 5 best ones but also most of the cast if you listen to the top Corrins"
"oh and btw she's top 20 maybe"
Like, huh?
/rant (apologies to thread, I'm the one complaining about Corrin discourse and then I'm the one talking about it the most)